Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (750 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
An idiopathic, rapidly evolving, and severely debilitating disease occurring most commonly in association with chronic ulcerative colitis. It is characterized by the presence of boggy, purplish ulcers with undermined borders, appearing mostly on the legs. The majority of cases are in people between 40 and 60 years old. Its etiology is unknown.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Pyoderma; Skin Diseases, Vascular; Skin Ulcer
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 2,864 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Pyoderma Gangrenosum” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 718 of them (25.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 1,080 records.
Reviews account for 540 records (18.9%) and meta-analyses for 5. Randomized controlled trials number 8 (0.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 327 |
| 2000-2009 | 739 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,080 |
| 2020 onward | 718 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 540 | 18.9% |
| Meta-analyses | 5 | 0.2% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 8 | 0.3% |
Method: PubMed query "Pyoderma Gangrenosum"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.
Reading the evidence in bones, joints, muscles and skin
Joint, bone, muscle and skin conditions are often judged by pain scores, function questionnaires, imaging or photographs, and symptoms can fluctuate, so placebo response and natural improvement matter. Imaging changes are common in people without symptoms. Nothing on this page is advice about treatment. Check how outcomes were measured, whether the comparison group received a placebo or usual care, and how long the benefit lasted.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comorbidity screening in hidradenitis suppurativa: Evidence-based recommendations from the US and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations | 2022 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 183 | cc by PMID 33493574 · DOI · PMC8298595 |
| Pyoderma gangrenosum--a review | 2007 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 171 | cc by PMID 17433111 · DOI · PMC1857704 |
| The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Pyoderma Gangrenosum-Current Options and New Perspectives | 2024 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 30 | cc by PMID 38397117 · DOI · PMC10889749 |
| Pyoderma gangrenosum: pathogenetic mechanisms and their implications for treatment | 2025 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 17 | cc by PMID 41128863 · DOI · PMC12549756 |
Comorbidity screening in hidradenitis suppurativa: Evidence-based recommendations from the US and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundHidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with comorbidities that contribute to poor health, impaired life quality, and mortality risk.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionsDermatologists should support screening efforts to identify comorbid conditions in HS.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (201 words)
BackgroundHidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with comorbidities that contribute to poor health, impaired life quality, and mortality risk.ObjectiveTo provide evidence-based screening recommendations for comorbidities linked to HS.MethodsSystematic reviews were performed to summarize evidence on the prevalence and incidence of 30 comorbidities in patients with HS relative to the general population. The screening recommendation for each comorbidity was informed by the consistency and quality of existing studies, disease prevalence, and magnitude of association, as well as benefits, harms, and feasibility of screening. The level of evidence and strength of corresponding screening recommendation were graded by using the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) criteria.ResultsScreening is recommended for the following comorbidities: acne, dissecting cellulitis of the scalp, pilonidal disease, pyoderma gangrenosum, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, suicide, smoking, substance use disorder, polycystic ovary syndrome, obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, spondyloarthritis, and sexual dysfunction. It is also recommended to screen patients with Down syndrome for HS. The decision to screen for specific comorbidities may vary with patient risk factors. The role of the dermatologist in screening varies according to comorbidity.LimitationsScreening recommendations represent one component of a comprehensive care strategy.ConclusionsDermatologists should support screening efforts to identify comorbid conditions in HS.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33493574 · DOI · PMC8298595
Pyoderma gangrenosum--a review [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare noninfectious neutrophilic dermatosis.
- Closing excerpt
- Despite recent advances in therapy, the prognosis of PG remains unpredictable.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (253 words)
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare noninfectious neutrophilic dermatosis. Clinically it starts with sterile pustules that rapidly progress and turn into painful ulcers of variable depth and size with undermined violaceous borders. The legs are most commonly affected but other parts of the skin and mucous membranes may also be involved. Course can be mild or malignant, chronic or relapsing with remarkable morbidity. In many cases PG is associated with an underlying disease, most commonly inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatic or haematological disease and malignancy. Diagnosis of PG is based on history of an underlying disease, typical clinical presentation, histopathology, and exclusion of other diseases that would lead to a similar appearance. The peak of incidence occurs between the ages of 20 to 50 years with women being more often affected than men. Aetiology has not been clearly determined yet. The treatment of PG is a challenge. Randomized, double-blinded prospective multicenter trials for PG are not available. The best documented treatments are systemic corticosteroids and cyclosporin A. Combinations of steroids with cytotoxic drugs are used in resistant cases. The combination of steroids with sulfa drugs or immunosuppressants has been used as steroid-sparing modalities. Anti-tumor necrosis alpha therapy in Crohn's disease showed a rapid response of PG. Skin transplants and the application of bioengineered skin is useful in selected cases as a complement to the immunosuppressive treatment. Topical therapy with modern wound dressings is useful to minimize pain and the risk of secondary infections. Despite recent advances in therapy, the prognosis of PG remains unpredictable.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 17433111 · DOI · PMC1857704
The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Pyoderma Gangrenosum-Current Options and New Perspectives [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is an uncommon inflammatory dermatological disorder characterized by painful ulcers that quickly spread peripherally.
- Closing excerpt
- In this review, we summarize the discoveries regarding the pathophysiology of PG and present treatment options to raise awareness and improve the management of this rare entity.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (118 words)
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is an uncommon inflammatory dermatological disorder characterized by painful ulcers that quickly spread peripherally. The pathophysiology of PG is not fully understood; however, it is most commonly considered a disease in the spectrum of neutrophilic dermatoses. The treatment of PG remains challenging due to the lack of generally accepted therapeutic guidelines. Existing therapeutic methods focus on limiting inflammation through the use of immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies. Recently, several reports have indicated the successful use of biologic drugs and small molecules administered for coexisting diseases, resulting in ulcer healing. In this review, we summarize the discoveries regarding the pathophysiology of PG and present treatment options to raise awareness and improve the management of this rare entity.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38397117 · DOI · PMC10889749
Pyoderma gangrenosum: pathogenetic mechanisms and their implications for treatment [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare inflammatory skin disease belonging to the group of neutrophilic dermatoses.
- Closing excerpt
- We review established and emerging pathogenesis-driven treatments, also providing a therapeutic algorithm and informing future directions in the management of PG.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (178 words)
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare inflammatory skin disease belonging to the group of neutrophilic dermatoses. The pathogenesis of PG involves a predisposing genetic background that facilitates a dysregulated innate and adaptive immune response, with an imbalance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators, leading to neutrophil-driven inflammatory damage. Several immunosuppressants and immunomodulatory drugs are currently available for the treatment of PG, in combination with topical therapies, wound management and pain control strategies. Systemic corticosteroids and cyclosporine remain the first-line treatment options with the best evidence. However, in recent years, the rise of knowledge about different pathogenic mechanisms has led to a significant increase in studies attesting the efficacy and safety of biologic therapies including, among others, antagonists of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-23, becoming the drug of choice in specific clinical setting. Similarly, different small molecules such as JAK-STAT (Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription) inhibitors are showing promising results for the treatment of PG. We review established and emerging pathogenesis-driven treatments, also providing a therapeutic algorithm and informing future directions in the management of PG.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41128863 · DOI · PMC12549756
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Pyoderma gangrenosum: classification and management [5]
- Research article Diagnostic Criteria of Ulcerative Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A Delphi Consensus of International Experts [6]
- Research article Pyoderma gangrenosum: an updated review [7]
- Research article Etiology and management of pyoderma gangrenosum: a comprehensive review [8]
- Research article Pyoderma gangrenosum [9]
- Research article Pyoderma gangrenosum [10]
Full-text reviews on EvidenceLib
Open-access review articles about this topic, reproduced in full with authors, licence and references.
Ear, Nose, and Throat Manifestations in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Spectrum
Eleni Litsou, Georgios Psychogios, Maria Saridi et al. · Medicina 2026 · CC BY 4.0
References
- Garg A, Malviya N, Strunk A, Wright S, Alavi A, Alhusayen R, et al.. Comorbidity screening in hidradenitis suppurativa: Evidence-based recommendations from the US and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations. . 2022. PMID 33493574 · DOI · PMC8298595
- Wollina U. Pyoderma gangrenosum--a review. . 2007. PMID 17433111 · DOI · PMC1857704
- Łyko M, Ryguła A, Kowalski M, Karska J, Jankowska-Konsur A. The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Pyoderma Gangrenosum-Current Options and New Perspectives. . 2024. PMID 38397117 · DOI · PMC10889749
- Moltrasio C, Romagnuolo M, Tavoletti G, Maronese CA, Marzano AV. Pyoderma gangrenosum: pathogenetic mechanisms and their implications for treatment. . 2025. PMID 41128863 · DOI · PMC12549756
- Powell FC, Su WP, Perry HO. Pyoderma gangrenosum: classification and management. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996. PMID 8609250 · DOI
- Maverakis E, Ma C, Shinkai K, Fiorentino D, Callen JP, Wollina U, et al.. Diagnostic Criteria of Ulcerative Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A Delphi Consensus of International Experts. JAMA Dermatol. 2018. PMID 29450466 · DOI
- Ruocco E, Sangiuliano S, Gravina AG, Miranda A, Nicoletti G. Pyoderma gangrenosum: an updated review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009. PMID 19470075 · DOI
- Ahronowitz I, Harp J, Shinkai K. Etiology and management of pyoderma gangrenosum: a comprehensive review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2012. PMID 22356259 · DOI
- Callen JP. Pyoderma gangrenosum. Lancet. 1998. PMID 9492798 · DOI
- Maverakis E, Marzano AV, Le ST, Callen JP, Brüggen MC, Guenova E, et al.. Pyoderma gangrenosum. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020. PMID 33033263 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.