Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,061 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Diagnostic assays designed for use at the point-of-care (POC) that can be adapted for use in low-resource settings. These tests are low-cost, simple to operate and read, sensitive, specific, stable at high temperatures, and works in a short period of time.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Diagnostic Test, Rapid; Diagnostic Tests, Rapid; Rapid Diagnostics; Diagnostic, Rapid; Diagnostics, Rapid; Rapid Diagnostic; Rapid Diagnostic Test.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Point-of-Care Testing
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,603 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Rapid Diagnostic Tests” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 1,600 of them (99.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 1,600 records.
Reviews account for 201 records (12.5%) and meta-analyses for 28. Randomized controlled trials number 19 (1.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 3 |
| 2000-2009 | 0 |
| 2010-2019 | 0 |
| 2020 onward | 1,600 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 201 | 12.5% |
| Meta-analyses | 28 | 1.7% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 19 | 1.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Rapid Diagnostic Tests"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.
Reading the evidence in diagnostics and medical technology
A test or device is judged by how well it detects a condition, how often it gives false alarms or misses cases, and whether using it improves outcomes for people. Accuracy depends on who is tested and how common the condition is, so a test that performs well in a specialist hospital can perform differently in the community. Check the reference standard, the population studied, the sensitivity and specificity and whether results were confirmed in a separate group.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target product profile for readers of rapid diagnostic tests | 2023 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 14 | cc by PMID 37131947 · DOI · PMC10140691 |
| Laboratory evaluation of eleven rapid diagnostic tests for serological diagnosis of Chagas disease in Colombia | 2023 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 12 | cc by PMID 37607214 · DOI · PMC10473487 |
| Availability and use of rapid diagnostic tests for the management of acute childhood infections in Europe: A cross-sectional survey of paediatricians | 2022 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 10 | cc by PMID 36538525 · DOI · PMC9767335 |
| Development of a broad-lineage Lassa virus rapid diagnostic test informed by the WHO REASSURED framework | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 41910272 · DOI · PMC13170227 |
Target product profile for readers of rapid diagnostic tests [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- While equipment-free visual interpretation is a benefit of lateral-flow assays, automating the reading of rapid diagnostic tests promotes proper test performance, interpretation and reporting of the results.
- Closing excerpt
- Optimally, readers should: (i) provide at least 98% agreement; (ii) operate with multiple models of rapid diagnostic tests; (iii) assist the user in performing each rapid diagnostic test according to the test instructions; and (iv) offer multiple configurations, operating modes and languages to suit the needs of diverse users, settings and health programmes.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (225 words)
While equipment-free visual interpretation is a benefit of lateral-flow assays, automating the reading of rapid diagnostic tests promotes proper test performance, interpretation and reporting of the results. We have created a target product profile that describes the minimal and optimal characteristics of various rapid diagnostic test readers. The product profile is intended to promote the development of effective, useful, sustainable rapid diagnostic test readers in support of health programmes worldwide. These readers may be custom hardware or software-only running on a general-purpose mobile device, for professional or lay use, and for medical or non-medical purposes. During the development of the product profile, the World Health Organization and FIND convened a development group of 40 leading scientists, experts, public health officials and regulators. We held a public consultation to which 27 individuals or organizations responded. The product profile calls for rapid diagnostic test readers that at minimum should: (i) interpret colorimetric tests with at least 95% agreement with expert visual interpretation; and (ii) automatically report results and associated data for the health programme. Optimally, readers should: (i) provide at least 98% agreement; (ii) operate with multiple models of rapid diagnostic tests; (iii) assist the user in performing each rapid diagnostic test according to the test instructions; and (iv) offer multiple configurations, operating modes and languages to suit the needs of diverse users, settings and health programmes.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37131947 · DOI · PMC10140691
Laboratory evaluation of eleven rapid diagnostic tests for serological diagnosis of Chagas disease in Colombia [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundChagas disease is a public health challenge in Colombia, where only an estimated 1.
- Closing excerpt
- As a next step, field studies will be conducted on available RDTs with sensitivity and specificity greater than 90% in this study, to evaluate performance in real world conditions, with the final goal to allow simplified diagnostic algorithms.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (282 words)
BackgroundChagas disease is a public health challenge in Colombia, where only an estimated 1.2% of people at risk have accessed diagnosis, while less than 0.5% of affected people have obtained treatment. The development of simplified diagnostic algorithms would enable progress in access to diagnosis; however, the current diagnostic algorithm relies on at least two laboratory-based tests that require qualified personnel, processing equipment, and infrastructure, which are still generally lacking at the primary care level. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for Chagas disease could simplify diagnosis, but their performance in the epidemiological context of Colombia is not well known.MethodologyA retrospective analytical observational study of RDTs was performed to estimate the operational characteristics of 11 commercially available RDTs designed for in vitro detection of anti-T. cruzi IgG antibodies. The study was performed under controlled laboratory conditions using human serum samples.Principal findingsEleven RDTs were assessed, ten using 585 serum samples and one using 551 serum samples. Employing the current national diagnostic algorithm as a reference standard for serological diagnosis of chronic infection, the sensitivity of the assessed RDTs ranged from 75.5% to 99.0% (95% CI 70.5-100), while specificity ranged from 70.9% to 100% (95% CI 65.3-100). Most tests (7/11, 63.6%) had sensitivity above 90%, and almost all (10/11, 90.9%) had specificity above 90%. Five RDTs had both sensitivity and specificity above 90%.Conclusions/significanceThe evaluation of these 11 commercially available RDTs under controlled laboratory conditions is a first step in the assessment of the diagnostic performance of RDTs in Colombia. As a next step, field studies will be conducted on available RDTs with sensitivity and specificity greater than 90% in this study, to evaluate performance in real world conditions, with the final goal to allow simplified diagnostic algorithms.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37607214 · DOI · PMC10473487
Availability and use of rapid diagnostic tests for the management of acute childhood infections in Europe: A cross-sectional survey of paediatricians [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundPoint-of-care-tests (POCTs) have been advocated to optimise care in patients with infections but their actual use varies.
- Closing excerpt
- To inform future implementation of both existing and innovative tests, further research is needed to understand what drives the variation between countries, the needs of frontline clinicians, and the role of diagnostic tests in the management of acute childhood infections.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (295 words)
BackgroundPoint-of-care-tests (POCTs) have been advocated to optimise care in patients with infections but their actual use varies. This study aimed to estimate the variability in the adoption of current POCTs by paediatricians across Europe, and to explore the determinants of variability.Methods and findingsA cross-sectional survey was conducted of hospital and primary care paediatricians, recruited through professional networks. Questions focused on the availability and use of currently available POCTs. Data were analysed descriptively and using Median Odds Ratio (MOR) to measure variation between countries. Multilevel regression modelling using changes in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of models were used to assess the contribution of individual or workplace versus country level factors, to the observed variation. The commonest POCT was urine dipsticks (UD) which were available to >80% of primary care and hospital paediatricians in 68% (13/19) and 79% (23/29) countries, respectively. Availability of all POCTs varied between countries. In primary care, the country (MOR) varied from 1.61 (95%CI: 1.04-2.58) for lactate to 7.28 (95%CI: 3.04-24.35) for UD. In hospitals, the country MOR varied from 1.37 (95%CI:1.04-1.80) for lactate to 11.93 (95%CI:3.35-72.23) for UD. Most paediatricians in primary care (69%, 795/1154) and hospital (81%, 962/1188) would use a diagnostic test in the case scenario of an infant with undifferentiated fever. Multilevel regression modelling showed that the country of work was more important in predicting both the availability and use of POCTs than individual or workplace characteristics.ConclusionThere is substantial variability in the adoption of POCTs for the management of acute infections in children across Europe. To inform future implementation of both existing and innovative tests, further research is needed to understand what drives the variation between countries, the needs of frontline clinicians, and the role of diagnostic tests in the management of acute childhood infections.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36538525 · DOI · PMC9767335
Development of a broad-lineage Lassa virus rapid diagnostic test informed by the WHO REASSURED framework [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Lassa fever is a high-risk viral disease endemic to West Africa for which rapid and reliable diagnosis is essential for outbreak control.
- Closing excerpt
- The assay demonstrates high analytical sensitivity and broad lineage coverage in a field-deployable format, supporting its potential utility for early case detection and decentralized surveillance in endemic settings.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (259 words)
Lassa fever is a high-risk viral disease endemic to West Africa for which rapid and reliable diagnosis is essential for outbreak control. Here, we describe the development of a lateral flow-based rapid diagnostic test (RDT) targeting the Lassa virus nucleoprotein using newly generated monoclonal antibody pairs. The analytical performance of the assay was evaluated using human serum and plasma specimens as well as inactivated Lassa virus strains and compared with a commercially available antigen test. The final RDT (Pair 2; 1P-44-7/9B-28) demonstrated high analytical sensitivity and 100% specificity across 60 human samples and detected multiple genetically diverse Lassa virus strains, with lineage-dependent differences in analytical sensitivity. In direct analytical comparisons using recombinant antigen, the assay was approximately 64-fold more sensitive than the ReLASV Pan-Lassa Antigen Rapid Test. The RDT provides a rapid visual readout, remains stable at ambient temperatures, and is suitable for decentralized testing workflows, features aligned with key aspects of the World Health Organization (WHO) REASSURED framework. These results indicate that the developed RDT offers a robust and broadly reactive platform for Lassa virus antigen detection and has potential utility for surveillance and outbreak response in resource-limited settings.IMPORTANCELassa fever remains a significant public health concern in West Africa, where diagnostic capacity is often limited in endemic regions. This study describes the development of a broad-lineage Lassa virus rapid diagnostic test informed by the World Health Organization (WHO) REASSURED framework. The assay demonstrates high analytical sensitivity and broad lineage coverage in a field-deployable format, supporting its potential utility for early case detection and decentralized surveillance in endemic settings.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41910272 · DOI · PMC13170227
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Rapid Diagnostic Tests and Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs for the Management of Bloodstream Infection: What Is Their Relative Contribution to Improving Clinical Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis [5]
- Research article Rapid diagnostic test: a critical need for outbreak preparedness and response for high priority pathogens [6]
- Research article Comprehensive Review on Rapid Diagnosis of New Infection COVID-19 [7]
- Research article Performance of self-performed SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: a systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
- Research article Advances in rapid diagnostic tests for myocardial infarction patients [9]
- Research article Rapid diagnostic strategies using high sensitivity troponin assays: what is the evidence and how should they be implemented? [10]
References
- White W, Kadam R, Moussy F. Target product profile for readers of rapid diagnostic tests. . 2023. PMID 37131947 · DOI · PMC10140691
- Marchiol A, Florez Sanchez AC, Caicedo A, Segura M, Bautista J, Ayala Sotelo MS, et al.. Laboratory evaluation of eleven rapid diagnostic tests for serological diagnosis of Chagas disease in Colombia. . 2023. PMID 37607214 · DOI · PMC10473487
- Dewez JE, Pembrey L, Nijman RG, Del Torso S, Grossman Z, Hadjipanayis A, et al.. Availability and use of rapid diagnostic tests for the management of acute childhood infections in Europe: A cross-sectional survey of paediatricians. . 2022. PMID 36538525 · DOI · PMC9767335
- Shin H, Lee M, Choi M-M, Kim J-W, Yi H, Whitmer S, et al.. Development of a broad-lineage Lassa virus rapid diagnostic test informed by the WHO REASSURED framework. . 2026. PMID 41910272 · DOI · PMC13170227
- Peri AM, Chatfield MD, Ling W, Furuya-Kanamori L, Harris PNA, Paterson DL. Rapid Diagnostic Tests and Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs for the Management of Bloodstream Infection: What Is Their Relative Contribution to Improving Clinical Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2024. PMID 38676943 · DOI · PMC11327801
- Yimer SA, Booij BB, Tobert G, Hebbeler A, Oloo P, Brangel P, et al.. Rapid diagnostic test: a critical need for outbreak preparedness and response for high priority pathogens. BMJ Glob Health. 2024. PMID 38688565 · DOI · PMC11085978
- MubarakAli D. Comprehensive Review on Rapid Diagnosis of New Infection COVID-19. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2022. PMID 34714500 · DOI · PMC8553914
- Cai P, Wang J, Ye P, Zhang Y, Wang M, Guo R, et al.. Performance of self-performed SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID 39494084 · DOI · PMC11527648
- Hartikainen T, Westermann D. Advances in rapid diagnostic tests for myocardial infarction patients. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2023. PMID 37099443 · DOI
- Collinson P, Dakshi A, Khand A. Rapid diagnostic strategies using high sensitivity troponin assays: what is the evidence and how should they be implemented?. Ann Clin Biochem. 2023. PMID 35491935 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.