Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat›Retinal Detachment

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Retinal Detachment

Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Separation of the inner layers of the retina (neural retina) from the pigment epithelium.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (851 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Separation of the inner layers of the retina (neural retina) from the pigment epithelium. Retinal detachment occurs more commonly in men than in women, in eyes with degenerative myopia, in aging and in aphakia. It may occur after an uncomplicated cataract extraction, but it is seen more often if vitreous humor has been lost during surgery. (Dorland, 27th ed; Newell, Ophthalmology: Principles and Concepts, 7th ed, p310-12).

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Detachment, Retinal; Detachments, Retinal; Retinal Detachments; Retinal Pigment Epithelial Detachment.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Retinal Diseases
See also
Scleral Buckling; Retinoschisis

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 22,642 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Retinal Detachment” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 3,474 of them (15.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 11,758 records.

Reviews account for 1,209 records (5.3%) and meta-analyses for 114. Randomized controlled trials number 294 (1.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 11,758 records; 2000-2009: 3,277 records; 2010-2019: 4,133 records; 2020 onward: 3,474 records11,758through 19993,2772000-20094,1332010-20193,4742020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199911,758
2000-20093,277
2010-20194,133
2020 onward3,474
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.3 percentReviews5.3% (1,209)Meta-analyses0.5% (114)Randomized controlled trials1.3% (294)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 22,642 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,2095.3%
Meta-analyses1140.5%
Randomized controlled trials2941.3%

Method: PubMed query "Retinal Detachment"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.

Reading the evidence in eye, ear, nose and throat

Eye, hearing, nose and throat studies rely on specialist tests (visual acuity, eye pressure, audiograms, scopes) and on patient-reported symptoms, which vary between people and with age. Some conditions improve without treatment, so comparison groups matter. Nothing on this page is advice about diagnosis or treatment; sudden loss of sight or hearing needs urgent care from a qualified clinician. Check how the outcome was tested, the age of the people studied and how long they were followed.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: an update on the current and emerging treatment options
Ferro Desideri L, Artemiev D, Zandi S, Zinkernagel MS, Anguita R
2024Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
45cc by
PMID 37843566 · DOI · PMC10907475
Fibrotic Changes in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Harju N, Kauppinen A, Loukovaara S
2025Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
21cc by
PMID 39940795 · DOI · PMC11817287
Developing and validating a clinlabomics-based machine-learning model for early detection of retinal detachment in patients with high myopia
Li S, Li M, Wu J, Li Y, Han J, Song Y, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
21cc by
PMID 38689321 · DOI · PMC11061938
A Comparative Analysis of Deep Convolutional Networks for Automated Diagnosis of Retinal Detachment in Dogs
Okur S, Baykal B, Akçora Y, Modoğlu E, Kibar B, İlgün M, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 41944517 · DOI · PMC13055114

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: an update on the current and emerging treatment options [1]

Review article Ferro Desideri L, Artemiev D, Zandi S, Zinkernagel MS, Anguita R · · 2024 · cited 45 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains the main cause of failure in retinal detachment (RD) surgery and a demanding challenge for vitreoretinal surgeons.
Closing excerpt
In this review, we analyze the current and emerging adjunctive treatment options for the management of PVR and we discuss their possible clinical application and beneficial role in this subgroup of patients.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (96 words)

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains the main cause of failure in retinal detachment (RD) surgery and a demanding challenge for vitreoretinal surgeons. Despite the large improvements in surgical techniques and a better understanding of PVR pathogenesis in the last years, satisfactory anatomical and visual outcomes have not been provided yet. For this reason, several different adjunctive pharmacological agents have been investigated in combination with surgery. In this review, we analyze the current and emerging adjunctive treatment options for the management of PVR and we discuss their possible clinical application and beneficial role in this subgroup of patients.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37843566 · DOI · PMC10907475

Fibrotic Changes in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment [2]

Review article Harju N, Kauppinen A, Loukovaara S · · 2025 · cited 21 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a sight-threatening condition involving retinal detachment and the accumulation of fluid in the subretinal space.
Closing excerpt
Currently, there is no preventive treatment for the formation of PVR, and it is worth studying in the future.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (230 words)

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a sight-threatening condition involving retinal detachment and the accumulation of fluid in the subretinal space. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is a pathologic complication that develops after RRD surgery, and approximately 5-10% of RRD cases develop post-operative PVR. Prolonged inflammation in the wound healing process, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell migration and proliferation, and epiretinal, intraretinal, and subretinal fibrosis are typical in the formation of PVR. RPE cells undergo EMT and become fibroblast-like cells that migrate to the retina and vitreous, promoting PVR formation. Fibroblasts transform into myofibroblasts, which promote fibrosis by overproducing the extracellular matrix (ECM). RPE cells, fibroblasts, glial cells, macrophages, T lymphocytes, and increased ECM production form contractile epiretinal membranes. Cytokine release, complement activation, RPE cells, glial cells, and endothelial cells are all involved in retinal immune responses. Normally, wounds heal within 4 to 6 weeks, including hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling phases. Properly initiated inflammation, complement activation, and the function of neutrophils and glial cells heal the wound in the first stage. In a retinal wound, glial cells proliferate and fill the injured area. Gliosis tries to protect the neurons and prevent damage, but it becomes harmful when it causes scarring. If healing is complicated, prolonged inflammation leads to pathological fibrosis. Currently, there is no preventive treatment for the formation of PVR, and it is worth studying in the future.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39940795 · DOI · PMC11817287

Developing and validating a clinlabomics-based machine-learning model for early detection of retinal detachment in patients with high myopia [3]

Research article Li S, Li M, Wu J, Li Y, Han J, Song Y, et al. · · 2024 · cited 21 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundRetinal detachment (RD) is a vision-threatening disorder of significant severity.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionGBM algorithms based on nine features successfully predicted the diagnosis of RD in patients with HM, which will help ophthalmologists to establish a preliminary diagnosis and to improve diagnostic accuracy in the clinic.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (339 words)

BackgroundRetinal detachment (RD) is a vision-threatening disorder of significant severity. Individuals with high myopia (HM) face a 2 to 6 times higher risk of developing RD compared to non-myopes. The timely identification of high myopia-related retinal detachment (HMRD) is crucial for effective treatment and prevention of additional vision impairment. Consequently, our objective was to streamline and validate a machine-learning model based on clinical laboratory omics (clinlabomics) for the early detection of RD in HM patients.MethodsWe extracted clinlabomics data from the electronic health records for 24,440 HM and 5607 HMRD between 2015 and 2022. Lasso regression analysis assessed fifty-nine variables, excluding collinear variables (variance inflation factor > 10). Four models based on random forest, gradient boosting machine (GBM), generalized linear model, and Deep Learning Model were trained for HMRD diagnosis and employed for internal validation. An external test of the models was done. Three random data sets were further processed to validate the performance of the diagnostic model. The primary outcomes were the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUCPR) to diagnose HMRD.ResultsNine variables were selected by all models. Given the AUC and AUCPR values across the different sets, the GBM model was chosen as the final diagnostic model. The GBM model had an AUC of 0.8550 (95%CI = 0.8322-0.8967) and an AUCPR of 0.5584 (95%CI = 0.5250-0.5879) in the training set. The AUC and AUCPR in the internal validation were 0.8405 (95%CI = 0.8060-0.8966) and 0.5355 (95%CI = 0.4988-0.5732). During the external test evaluation, it reached an AUC of 0.7579 (95%CI = 0.7340-0.7840) and an AUCPR of 0.5587 (95%CI = 0.5345-0.5880). A similar discriminative capacity was observed in the three random data sets. The GBM model was well-calibrated across all the sets. The GBM-RD model was implemented into a web application that provides risk prediction for HM individuals.ConclusionGBM algorithms based on nine features successfully predicted the diagnosis of RD in patients with HM, which will help ophthalmologists to establish a preliminary diagnosis and to improve diagnostic accuracy in the clinic.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38689321 · DOI · PMC11061938

A Comparative Analysis of Deep Convolutional Networks for Automated Diagnosis of Retinal Detachment in Dogs [4]

Research article Okur S, Baykal B, Akçora Y, Modoğlu E, Kibar B, İlgün M, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectiveTo compare ImageNet-pretrained deep convolutional neural networks for automated detection of retinal detachment (RD) in canine fundus photographs.
Closing excerpt
Prospective external validation across additional devices and practice settings is warranted before routine clinical implementation.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (186 words)

ObjectiveTo compare ImageNet-pretrained deep convolutional neural networks for automated detection of retinal detachment (RD) in canine fundus photographs.Animals studiedArchived fundus images from 275 dogs.ProceduresIn this multicenter retrospective study, 2000 color fundus photographs (793 RD; 1207 normal) acquired between 2020 and 2025 were included after quality filtering. Data were split at the patient level into training (80%) and an independent validation set (20%). Transfer learning was applied to three pretrained architectures (ResNet50V2, VGG16, EfficientNetB0) using standardized preprocessing and real-time augmentation. Performance on the validation set was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals were estimated by bootstrapping.ResultsResNet50V2 achieved the best overall discrimination (accuracy 0.8909; AUC 0.9194), followed by EfficientNetB0 (accuracy 0.8182; AUC 0.8831). VGG16 showed limited reliability (accuracy 0.6182; AUC 0.6868) due to a high false-positive rate. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping indicated that the best-performing model consistently attended to regions consistent with retinal detachment.ConclusionsResNet50V2-based analysis of canine fundus photographs shows strong potential as a scalable screening support tool for RD. Prospective external validation across additional devices and practice settings is warranted before routine clinical implementation.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41944517 · DOI · PMC13055114

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment--an ophthalmologic emergency [5]
    Feltgen N, Walter P · Dtsch Arztebl Int · 2014 · cited 105 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Retinal detachment following cataract phacoemulsification-a review of the literature [6]
    Qureshi MH, Steel DHW · Eye (Lond) · 2020 · cited 86 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A brief review of the histopathology of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) [7]
    Mudhar HS · Eye (Lond) · 2020 · cited 86 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Impact of duration of macula-off retinal detachment on visual outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature [8]
    van Bussel EM, van der Valk R, Bijlsma WR, La Heij EC · Retina · 2014 · cited 80 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Retinal Detachment and Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy [9]
    Kwon OW, Song JH, Roh MI · Dev Ophthalmol · 2016 · cited 75 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Posterior Vitreous Detachment, Retinal Breaks, and Lattice Degeneration Preferred Practice Pattern® [10]
    Flaxel CJ, Adelman RA, Bailey ST, Fawzi A, Lim JI, Vemulakonda GA, et al. · Ophthalmology · 2020 · cited 74 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Ferro Desideri L, Artemiev D, Zandi S, Zinkernagel MS, Anguita R. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: an update on the current and emerging treatment options. . 2024. PMID 37843566 · DOI · PMC10907475
  2. Harju N, Kauppinen A, Loukovaara S. Fibrotic Changes in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. . 2025. PMID 39940795 · DOI · PMC11817287
  3. Li S, Li M, Wu J, Li Y, Han J, Song Y, et al.. Developing and validating a clinlabomics-based machine-learning model for early detection of retinal detachment in patients with high myopia. . 2024. PMID 38689321 · DOI · PMC11061938
  4. Okur S, Baykal B, Akçora Y, Modoğlu E, Kibar B, İlgün M, et al.. A Comparative Analysis of Deep Convolutional Networks for Automated Diagnosis of Retinal Detachment in Dogs. . 2026. PMID 41944517 · DOI · PMC13055114
  5. Feltgen N, Walter P. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment--an ophthalmologic emergency. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014. PMID 24565273 · DOI · PMC3948016
  6. Qureshi MH, Steel DHW. Retinal detachment following cataract phacoemulsification-a review of the literature. Eye (Lond). 2020. PMID 31576027 · DOI · PMC7093479
  7. Mudhar HS. A brief review of the histopathology of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). Eye (Lond). 2020. PMID 31792351 · DOI · PMC7002513
  8. van Bussel EM, van der Valk R, Bijlsma WR, La Heij EC. Impact of duration of macula-off retinal detachment on visual outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature. Retina. 2014. PMID 25121930 · DOI
  9. Kwon OW, Song JH, Roh MI. Retinal Detachment and Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy. Dev Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID 26501375 · DOI
  10. Flaxel CJ, Adelman RA, Bailey ST, Fawzi A, Lim JI, Vemulakonda GA, et al.. Posterior Vitreous Detachment, Retinal Breaks, and Lattice Degeneration Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2020. PMID 31757500 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Vitreous DetachmentEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • Retinal DystrophiesEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • Retinal Pigment EpitheliumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Epiretinal MembraneEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • Retinal NeovascularizationEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • Macular EdemaEye, Ear, Nose and Throat

All 51 articles in Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat →

At a glance

22,642
PubMed records on this heading
15%
published since 2020
1,209
review articles
294
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-11-04; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Vitreous DetachmentEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • Retinal DystrophiesEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • Retinal Pigment EpitheliumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Epiretinal MembraneEye, Ear, Nose and Throat
  • Retinal NeovascularizationEye, Ear, Nose and Throat

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support