Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Silage
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Silage

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Fodder converted into succulent feed for livestock through processes of anaerobic fermentation (as in a silo).

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (828 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Fodder converted into succulent feed for livestock through processes of anaerobic fermentation (as in a silo).

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Fermented Foods; Animal Feed

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 4,327 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Silage” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,089 of them (25.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 1,562 records.

Reviews account for 109 records (2.5%) and meta-analyses for 28. Randomized controlled trials number 145 (3.4%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 998 records; 2000-2009: 678 records; 2010-2019: 1,562 records; 2020 onward: 1,089 records998through 19996782000-20091,5622010-20191,0892020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999998
2000-2009678
2010-20191,562
2020 onward1,089
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 2.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.6 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.4 percentReviews2.5% (109)Meta-analyses0.6% (28)Randomized controlled trials3.4% (145)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 4,327 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1092.5%
Meta-analyses280.6%
Randomized controlled trials1453.4%

Method: PubMed query "Silage"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Bacterial and fungal core microbiomes associated with small grain silages during ensiling and aerobic spoilage
Duniere L, Xu S, Long J, Elekwachi C, Wang Y, Turkington K, et al.
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
89cc by
PMID 28253864 · DOI · PMC5335695
The bacterial community and metabolome dynamics and their interactions modulate fermentation process of whole crop corn silage prepared with or without inoculants
Xu D, Wang N, Rinne M, Ke W, Weinberg ZG, Da M, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
82cc by
PMID 32627363 · DOI · PMC7936295
Fermentation Quality and Additives: A Case of Rice Straw Silage
Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Abdullah N, Magaji U, Hussin G, Ramli A, et al.
2016Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
59cc by
PMID 27429981 · DOI · PMC4939334
Rehydrated ground corn silage as alternative to feedlot lambs: feeding behavior and performance
Silva LASD, Lima CLS, Carvalho GGP, Alba HDR, Araújo MLGML, Cruz CHD, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 41784849 · DOI · PMC12963215

Bacterial and fungal core microbiomes associated with small grain silages during ensiling and aerobic spoilage [1]

Research article Duniere L, Xu S, Long J, Elekwachi C, Wang Y, Turkington K, et al. · · 2017 · cited 89 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundDescribing the microbial populations present in small grain silage and understanding their changes during ensiling is of interest for improving the nutrient value of these important forage crops.
Closing excerpt
Adequately describing the microbial ecology of silages could lead to improved ensiling practices and the selection of silage inoculants that act synergistically with the natural forage microbiome.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (281 words)

BackgroundDescribing the microbial populations present in small grain silage and understanding their changes during ensiling is of interest for improving the nutrient value of these important forage crops. Barley, oat and triticale forages as well as an intercropped mixture of the 3 crops were harvested and ensiled in mini silos for a period of 90 days, followed by 14 days of aerobic exposure. Changes in fermentation characteristics and nutritive value were assessed in terminal silages and bacterial and fungal communities during ensiling and aerobic exposure were described using 16S and 18S rDNA sequencing, respectively.ResultsAll small grain silages exhibited chemical traits that were associated with well ensiled forages, such as low pH value (4.09 ± 0.28) and high levels of lactic acid (59.8 ± 14.59 mg/g DM). The number of microbial core genome operational taxonomic units (OTUs) decreased with time of ensiling. Taxonomic bacterial community profiles were dominated by the Lactobacillales after fermentation, with a notable increase in Bacillales as a result of aerobic exposure. Diversity of the fungal core microbiome was shown to also be reduced during ensiling. Operational taxonomic units assigned to filamentous fungi were found in the core microbiome at ensiling and after aerobic exposure, whereas the Saccharomycetales were the dominate yeast population after 90 days of ensiling and aerobic exposure. Bacterial and fungal orders typically associated with silage spoilage were identified in the core microbiome after aerobic exposure.ConclusionNext Generation Sequencing was successfully used to describe bacterial communities and the first record of fungal communities throughout the process of ensiling and utilization. Adequately describing the microbial ecology of silages could lead to improved ensiling practices and the selection of silage inoculants that act synergistically with the natural forage microbiome.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28253864 · DOI · PMC5335695

The bacterial community and metabolome dynamics and their interactions modulate fermentation process of whole crop corn silage prepared with or without inoculants [2]

Research article Xu D, Wang N, Rinne M, Ke W, Weinberg ZG, Da M, et al. · · 2021 · cited 82 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Multi-omics approach was adopted to investigate the modulation of bacterial microbiota and metabolome as well as their interactions in whole crop corn ensiling systems by inoculating homofermentative Lactobacillus plantarum or heterofermentative Lactobacillus buchneri.
Closing excerpt
Results of the current study improve our understanding of the complicated biological process underlying silage fermentation and provide a framework to re-evaluate silages with biofunctions, which may contribute to target-based regulation methods to produce functional silage for animal production.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (198 words)

Multi-omics approach was adopted to investigate the modulation of bacterial microbiota and metabolome as well as their interactions in whole crop corn ensiling systems by inoculating homofermentative Lactobacillus plantarum or heterofermentative Lactobacillus buchneri. Inoculations of the two different inoculants resulted in substantial differences in microbial community and metabolic composition as well as their dynamics in ensiled corn. Inoculants also altered the correlations of microbiota in different manners, and various keystone species were identified in corn silages with different treatments. Many metabolites with biofunctional activities like bacteriostatic, antioxidant, central nervous system inhibitory and anti-inflammatory were found in the present silage. A constitutive difference in microbiota dynamics was found for several pathways, which were upregulated by specific taxa in middle stage of fermentation, and widespread associations between metabolites with biofunctions and the species of lactic acid bacteria dominated in silage were observed. Multiple microbial and metabolic structures and dynamics were correlated and affected the fermentation process of the corn ensiling systems. Results of the current study improve our understanding of the complicated biological process underlying silage fermentation and provide a framework to re-evaluate silages with biofunctions, which may contribute to target-based regulation methods to produce functional silage for animal production.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32627363 · DOI · PMC7936295

Fermentation Quality and Additives: A Case of Rice Straw Silage [3]

Review article Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Abdullah N, Magaji U, Hussin G, Ramli A, et al. · · 2016 · cited 59 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Rice cultivation generates large amount of crop residues of which only 20% are utilized for industrial and domestic purposes.
Closing excerpt
This review emphasizes some practical aspects of silage processing and the use of additives for improvement of fermentation quality of rice straw.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (154 words)

Rice cultivation generates large amount of crop residues of which only 20% are utilized for industrial and domestic purposes. In most developing countries especially southeast Asia, rice straw is used as part of feeding ingredients for the ruminants. However, due to its low protein content and high level of lignin and silica, there is limitation to its digestibility and nutritional value. To utilize this crop residue judiciously, there is a need for improvement of its nutritive value to promote its utilization through ensiling. Understanding the fundamental principle of ensiling is a prerequisite for successful silage product. Prominent factors influencing quality of silage product include water soluble carbohydrates, natural microbial population, and harvesting conditions of the forage. Additives are used to control the fermentation processes to enhance nutrient recovery and improve silage stability. This review emphasizes some practical aspects of silage processing and the use of additives for improvement of fermentation quality of rice straw.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27429981 · DOI · PMC4939334

Rehydrated ground corn silage as alternative to feedlot lambs: feeding behavior and performance [4]

Research article Silva LASD, Lima CLS, Carvalho GGP, Alba HDR, Araújo MLGML, Cruz CHD, et al. · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
This study aimed to investigate the effect of replacing ground corn with rehydrated ground corn silage (RGCS) in high-concentrate diets on the feeding behavior and performance of feedlot lambs.
Closing excerpt
However, further research is needed, particularly concerning the economic aspects of its use.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (195 words)

This study aimed to investigate the effect of replacing ground corn with rehydrated ground corn silage (RGCS) in high-concentrate diets on the feeding behavior and performance of feedlot lambs. Forty, non-castrated, Santa Inês male lambs (approximately four months old with an average body weight of 21 ± 2.8 kg) were randomly assigned to a completely randomized design, with five dietary treatments, each including eight replications. The treatments consisted of replacing ground corn with RGCS at levels of 0, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 g/kg on a dry matter (DM) basis. The data collection period lasted 64 days. Replacement of ground corn with RGCS linearly decreased the intake of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and its feeding and rumination efficiencies (P 0.05). Thus, it can be concluded that RGCS can replace up to 1000 g/kg of ground corn in high-concentrate diets without negatively affecting the feeding behavior or performance of feedlot lambs. This approach offers strategic flexibility in using corn grain - either in its dry form or as rehydrated and ensiled - based on production goals or market conditions in ruminant feeding systems. However, further research is needed, particularly concerning the economic aspects of its use.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41784849 · DOI · PMC12963215

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages [5]
    Kung L, Shaver RD, Grant RJ, Schmidt RJ · J Dairy Sci · 2018 · cited 429 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives [6]
    Muck RE, Nadeau EMG, McAllister TA, Contreras-Govea FE, Santos MC, Kung L · J Dairy Sci · 2018 · cited 379 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages [7]
    Borreani G, Tabacco E, Schmidt RJ, Holmes BJ, Muck RE · J Dairy Sci · 2018 · cited 242 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Antagonistic activities of lactic acid bacteria in food and feed fermentations [8]
    Lindgren SE, Dobrogosz WJ · FEMS Microbiol Rev · 1990 · cited 191 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and the performance of dairy cows [9]
    Oliveira AS, Weinberg ZG, Ogunade IM, Cervantes AAP, Arriola KG, Jiang Y, et al. · J Dairy Sci · 2017 · cited 168 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A meta-analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn and grass and small-grain silages [10]
    Kleinschmit DH, Kung L · J Dairy Sci · 2006 · cited 147 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Duniere L, Xu S, Long J, Elekwachi C, Wang Y, Turkington K, et al.. Bacterial and fungal core microbiomes associated with small grain silages during ensiling and aerobic spoilage. . 2017. PMID 28253864 · DOI · PMC5335695
  2. Xu D, Wang N, Rinne M, Ke W, Weinberg ZG, Da M, et al.. The bacterial community and metabolome dynamics and their interactions modulate fermentation process of whole crop corn silage prepared with or without inoculants. . 2021. PMID 32627363 · DOI · PMC7936295
  3. Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Abdullah N, Magaji U, Hussin G, Ramli A, et al.. Fermentation Quality and Additives: A Case of Rice Straw Silage. . 2016. PMID 27429981 · DOI · PMC4939334
  4. Silva LASD, Lima CLS, Carvalho GGP, Alba HDR, Araújo MLGML, Cruz CHD, et al.. Rehydrated ground corn silage as alternative to feedlot lambs: feeding behavior and performance. . 2026. PMID 41784849 · DOI · PMC12963215
  5. Kung L, Shaver RD, Grant RJ, Schmidt RJ. Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. J Dairy Sci. 2018. PMID 29685275 · DOI
  6. Muck RE, Nadeau EMG, McAllister TA, Contreras-Govea FE, Santos MC, Kung L. Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives. J Dairy Sci. 2018. PMID 29685273 · DOI
  7. Borreani G, Tabacco E, Schmidt RJ, Holmes BJ, Muck RE. Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. J Dairy Sci. 2018. PMID 29685272 · DOI
  8. Lindgren SE, Dobrogosz WJ. Antagonistic activities of lactic acid bacteria in food and feed fermentations. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1990. PMID 2125429 · DOI
  9. Oliveira AS, Weinberg ZG, Ogunade IM, Cervantes AAP, Arriola KG, Jiang Y, et al.. Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and the performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2017. PMID 28342607 · DOI
  10. Kleinschmit DH, Kung L. A meta-analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn and grass and small-grain silages. J Dairy Sci. 2006. PMID 16960077 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • CheeseAnatomy and Physiology
  • YogurtAnatomy and Physiology
  • BeerAnatomy and Physiology
  • BreadAnatomy and Physiology
  • ButterAnatomy and Physiology
  • CandyAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

4,327
PubMed records on this heading
25%
published since 2020
109
review articles
145
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • CheeseAnatomy and Physiology
  • YogurtAnatomy and Physiology
  • BeerAnatomy and Physiology
  • BreadAnatomy and Physiology
  • ButterAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support