Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Fermented Foods
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Fermented Foods

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Foods that are prepared by using microorganisms to convert their components into various fermentation end products.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (808 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Foods that are prepared by using microorganisms to convert their components into various fermentation end products. Some pickled foods are considered fermented foods as their pickling results from the microbial production of lactic acid.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Fermented Food; Food, Fermented; Foods, Fermented; Fermented Foods and Beverages; Cultured Foods; Cultured Food; Food, Cultured; Foods, Cultured.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Diet, Food, and Nutrition; Food and Beverages
Narrower topics
Cultured Milk Products; Fermented Beverages; Silage; Soy Foods

Related concepts

  • Fermentation
  • Lactic Acid

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 39,352 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Fermented Foods” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 11,415 of them (29.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 14,065 records.

Reviews account for 2,761 records (7.0%) and meta-analyses for 226. Randomized controlled trials number 1,289 (3.3%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 5,549 records; 2000-2009: 8,323 records; 2010-2019: 14,065 records; 2020 onward: 11,415 records5,549through 19998,3232000-200914,0652010-201911,4152020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19995,549
2000-20098,323
2010-201914,065
2020 onward11,415
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 7.0 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.6 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.3 percentReviews7.0% (2,761)Meta-analyses0.6% (226)Randomized controlled trials3.3% (1,289)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 39,352 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,7617.0%
Meta-analyses2260.6%
Randomized controlled trials1,2893.3%

Method: PubMed query "Fermented Foods"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Wine consumption, Mediterranean diet, and cardiovascular risk in two Spanish cohorts
Martínez-González MA, Bes-Rastrollo M, Sayon-Orea C, Ruiz-Canela M, Timiraos J, Toledo E, et al.
2026Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
7cc by
PMID 41667089 · DOI · PMC13364079
Effects of Fermented Soy on Cognition in Older Adults: Outcomes of a Randomized, Controlled Trial
West LM, Sabaté J, Nwachukwu ID, Lee GJ, Sirirat R, Wright A, et al.
2025Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
7cc by
PMID 41010462 · DOI · PMC12472887
Fermented Foods and the Gut-Liver Axis: Modulation of MASLD Through Gut Microbiota
Wesołek-Leszczyńska A, Rosiejka D, Bogdańska K, Bogdański P
2026Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
5cc by
PMID 41683364 · DOI · PMC12899172

Wine consumption, Mediterranean diet, and cardiovascular risk in two Spanish cohorts [1]

Randomized controlled trial Martínez-González MA, Bes-Rastrollo M, Sayon-Orea C, Ruiz-Canela M, Timiraos J, Toledo E, et al. · · 2026 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Background and aimsThe benefits of the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) are well established.
Closing excerpt
Some non-significant associations and interactions advise caution in interpretation of these findings.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (303 words)

Background and aimsThe benefits of the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) are well established. However, one component, wine, remains controversial. This study assessed the association between MedDiet (with or without wine consumption) and major cardiovascular disease (CVD) or all-cause mortality.MethodsThe PREDIMED trial included 7447 high-risk participants. Adherence to MedDiet was measured using a validated 14-item questionnaire, including one item on wine (cut-off: seven glasses/week). The CVD events were recorded over a 4.8-year follow-up, while all-cause mortality was tracked for 17 years. A younger Spanish cohort (the SUN project), including 23,133 participants followed up for 22 years, was also evaluated.ResultsIn PREDIMED, compared with poor compliers with MedDiet (excluding wine), good compliers (excluding wine), had a multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-1.15] for CVD. For good compliers with MedDiet (including wine), the HR for CVD was 0.55 (95% CI 0.36-0.83). For all-cause mortality, MedDiet compliers (excluding wine) had HR of 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.87), which was 0.67 (95% CI 0.57-0.78) for MedDiet compliers (including wine). In exploratory dose-response analyses, reduced risk for death was not present in PREDIMED participants who drank three or more glasses of wine/day. Additionally, analyses least vulnerable to threats of abstainer bias were not significant and neither were multiplicative interaction terms for the wine item in the questionnaire. In the SUN cohort, no significant associations were observed between MedDiet compliance, wine, and CVD. However, for all-cause mortality, the HR was 0.94 (95% CI 0.71-1.26) for MedDiet compliers (excluding wine) and 0.54 (95% CI 0.28-1.04) for MedDiet compliers (including wine). When pooling both cohorts, wine consumption within the MedDiet was associated with lower all-cause mortality (P = .01).ConclusionsIn PREDIMED, moderate wine consumption, as part of the MedDiet, appeared to be associated with lower mortality and CVD risk. Some non-significant associations and interactions advise caution in interpretation of these findings.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41667089 · DOI · PMC13364079

Effects of Fermented Soy on Cognition in Older Adults: Outcomes of a Randomized, Controlled Trial [2]

Randomized controlled trial West LM, Sabaté J, Nwachukwu ID, Lee GJ, Sirirat R, Wright A, et al. · · 2025 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Background/Objectives: Soy foods and isoflavones are inversely associated with cognitive decline; however, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show mixed results.
Closing excerpt
Further research to confirm these findings in older women, and in males and other age categories is warranted.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (283 words)

Background/Objectives: Soy foods and isoflavones are inversely associated with cognitive decline; however, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show mixed results. Fermented soy contains bioactive compounds not found in unfermented soybeans, such as peptides and aglycone isoflavones, which may support cognition by reducing neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. Fermented soy RCTs on older adults with mild cognitive impairment show cognitive benefits; however, the effects of fermented soy on cognitively healthy older adults are not known. Methods: We investigated the effects of a non-probiotic fermented soy powder, added to the usual diet, compared to a placebo matched for energy on global cognition, memory, verbal fluency, processing speed, and executive function in a 12-week RCT on 61 adults aged 65 years and older (74 ± 5 y; 47 completers). Results: The fermented soy group showed significant improvement (p = 0.041) in memory scores (1.81%, 95% CI: -2.10, 5.72) vs. placebo (1.16%, 95% CI: -3.64, 5.97) using analysis of variance, adjusted for sex and baseline scores. Post hoc analyses on women 70 years and older (n = 29) found significant improvement in global cognition (p = 0.028) and memory (p = 0.049) in the fermented soy group. Global cognition mean change adjusted for baseline scores was 2.86% (95% CI: 1.52, 4.21) for fermented soy and 0.06% (95% CI: -1.43, 1.55) for placebo. Memory mean change adjusted for baseline scores was 8.47% (95% CI: 5.05, 11.89) in the fermented soy group, compared to 2.05% (95% CI: -1.75, 5.84) for placebo. Conclusions: These outcomes suggest that fermented soy has the potential to slow age-related cognitive decline, especially memory for women 70 and older. Further research to confirm these findings in older women, and in males and other age categories is warranted.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41010462 · DOI · PMC12472887

Fermented Foods and the Gut-Liver Axis: Modulation of MASLD Through Gut Microbiota [3]

Review article Wesołek-Leszczyńska A, Rosiejka D, Bogdańska K, Bogdański P · · 2026 · cited 5 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Background/Objectives: Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) is a prevalent condition defined by hepatic fat accumulation, inflammation, and metabolic dysregulation.
Closing excerpt
Personalized approaches and further long-term clinical trials are required to optimize interventions and establish evidence-based recommendations.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (222 words)

Background/Objectives: Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) is a prevalent condition defined by hepatic fat accumulation, inflammation, and metabolic dysregulation. Current evidence demonstrates that gut microbiota and their metabolites are associated with MASLD pathogenesis. Fermented foods, rich in live microbes and bioactive compounds, actively modulate the gut-liver axis and influence disease progression. This narrative review provides a comprehensive summary of current evidence on the impact of fermented foods on gut microbiota, intestinal barrier function, and gut-liver interactions, and demonstrates their potential role in preventing or mitigating MASLD. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of preclinical and clinical studies was conducted. Specifically, the review focused on fermented-food interventions, modulation of gut microbiota, metabolite production, and effects on hepatic metabolism and inflammation. Results: This review found that fermented foods provide probiotics, prebiotics, short-chain fatty acid (SCFAs), and bioactive compounds that enhance microbial diversity, improve intestinal barrier integrity, reduce endotoxemia, and modulate bile acid and lipid metabolism. Evidence from animal and human studies indicates that fermented food consumption can attenuate hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and metabolic dysregulation, with variability depending on individual microbiome composition. Conclusions: Altogether, these findings suggest that fermented foods represent a promising adjunctive dietary strategy for MASLD by modulating the gut-liver axis and supporting metabolic and hepatic health. Personalized approaches and further long-term clinical trials are required to optimize interventions and establish evidence-based recommendations.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41683364 · DOI · PMC12899172

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Meta-analysis of wine and beer consumption in relation to vascular risk [4]
    Di Castelnuovo A, Rotondo S, Iacoviello L, Donati MB, De Gaetano G · Circulation · 2002 · cited 330 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Soy Consumption and the Risk of Prostate Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [5]
    Applegate CC, Rowles JL, Ranard KM, Jeon S, Erdman JW · Nutrients · 2018 · cited 113 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Fermented Dairy Products, Probiotic Supplementation, and Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [6]
    Companys J, Pla-Pagà L, Calderón-Pérez L, Llauradó E, Solà R, Pedret A, et al. · Adv Nutr · 2020 · cited 107 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Meta-analysis of soy food and risk of prostate cancer in men [7]
    Yan L, Spitznagel EL · Int J Cancer · 2005 · cited 90 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Soya products and serum lipids: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials [8]
    Tokede OA, Onabanjo TA, Yansane A, Gaziano JM, Djoussé L · Br J Nutr · 2015 · cited 87 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Fermented dairy foods intake and risk of cancer [9]
    Zhang K, Dai H, Liang W, Zhang L, Deng Z · Int J Cancer · 2019 · cited 79 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Martínez-González MA, Bes-Rastrollo M, Sayon-Orea C, Ruiz-Canela M, Timiraos J, Toledo E, et al.. Wine consumption, Mediterranean diet, and cardiovascular risk in two Spanish cohorts. . 2026. PMID 41667089 · DOI · PMC13364079
  2. West LM, Sabaté J, Nwachukwu ID, Lee GJ, Sirirat R, Wright A, et al.. Effects of Fermented Soy on Cognition in Older Adults: Outcomes of a Randomized, Controlled Trial. . 2025. PMID 41010462 · DOI · PMC12472887
  3. Wesołek-Leszczyńska A, Rosiejka D, Bogdańska K, Bogdański P. Fermented Foods and the Gut-Liver Axis: Modulation of MASLD Through Gut Microbiota. . 2026. PMID 41683364 · DOI · PMC12899172
  4. Di Castelnuovo A, Rotondo S, Iacoviello L, Donati MB, De Gaetano G. Meta-analysis of wine and beer consumption in relation to vascular risk. Circulation. 2002. PMID 12070110 · DOI
  5. Applegate CC, Rowles JL, Ranard KM, Jeon S, Erdman JW. Soy Consumption and the Risk of Prostate Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2018. PMID 29300347 · DOI · PMC5793268
  6. Companys J, Pla-Pagà L, Calderón-Pérez L, Llauradó E, Solà R, Pedret A, et al.. Fermented Dairy Products, Probiotic Supplementation, and Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Adv Nutr. 2020. PMID 32277831 · DOI · PMC7360468
  7. Yan L, Spitznagel EL. Meta-analysis of soy food and risk of prostate cancer in men. Int J Cancer. 2005. PMID 15945102 · DOI
  8. Tokede OA, Onabanjo TA, Yansane A, Gaziano JM, Djoussé L. Soya products and serum lipids: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Nutr. 2015. PMID 26268987 · DOI
  9. Zhang K, Dai H, Liang W, Zhang L, Deng Z. Fermented dairy foods intake and risk of cancer. Int J Cancer. 2019. PMID 30374967 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • BeerAnatomy and Physiology
  • CheeseAnatomy and Physiology
  • SilageAnatomy and Physiology
  • WineAnatomy and Physiology
  • YogurtAnatomy and Physiology
  • Functional FoodAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

39,352
PubMed records on this heading
29%
published since 2020
2,761
review articles
1,289
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • BeerAnatomy and Physiology
  • CheeseAnatomy and Physiology
  • SilageAnatomy and Physiology
  • WineAnatomy and Physiology
  • YogurtAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support