Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Cancer in English prisons: a mixed-methods study of diagnosis, treatment, care costs and patient and staff experiences›Health economic results

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Cancer in English prisons: a mixed-methods study of diagnosis, treatment, care costs and patient and staff experiences · Health economic results

Health economic results

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 4 min read

Some text in this chapter has been reproduced with permission from Hunter et al.43 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The text below includes minor additions and formatting changes to the original text.

Demographic characteristics for the prison and general population cohorts are reported in Table 4. Patients diagnosed with cancer in prison were less likely to attend outpatient appointments (OR 0.31 95% CI 0.25 to 0.39) and have planned inpatient attendances (OR 0.75 95% CI 0.64 to 0.88) than the matched cohort of patients diagnosed in the general population (Table 5). Among all patients who had any outpatient appointment, 20.8% (n = 275) of people diagnosed in prison had a ‘did not attend’ recorded for an outpatient appointment compared with 13.0% (n = 448) of the matched general population cohort. This represents a significantly higher likelihood of a ‘did not attend’ for patients diagnosed in prison (OR 1.79 95% CI 1.51 to 2.11).

TABLE 4 Demographics for HES analysis data set for patients diagnosed in prison compared with the matched general population cohort
Place of diagnosisp-valuea
General populationPrison
n % n %
Patients 4326100879100
Sex 0.94
Men40829483094
Women2446496
Age category (years) 1
18–2029161
21–24571121
25–291093263
30–393418708
40–496931614016
50–5910782521625
60–6911442623126
70–797231714617
≥ 801524324
Stage 1
I10142320523
II5341210812
III6761613816
IV12622925329
Missing8401917520
Diagnosis year 1
20125051210212
20136621513515
20146971614216
20157751815718
20168672017620
20178201916719
Ethnicity < 0.001
White37378669879
Mixed190142
Asian and Chinese1343131
Black1012405
Other631273
Missing27268710
Charlson comorbidity score 0.07
036228470881
1–25181212414
≥ 31864475
TABLE 5 Resource use 6 months post cancer diagnosis with means and SDs reported only for patients with an attendance
General population (n = 4326)Prison (n = 879)ORa (95% CI)
Outpatient
Proportion (%)93.3982.250.31 (0.25 to 0.39)
Attendances,b mean (SD)11.97 (11.90)8.86 (10.96)
Elective (planned) inpatient care
Proportion (%)35.9929.820.75 (0.64 to 0.88)
Attendances,b mean (SD)1.38 (0.93)1.41 (1.02)
Bed-days,b mean (SD)8.25 (10.78)8.61 (11.08)
Day cases
Proportion (%)45.2836.860.69 (0.60 to 0.81)
Attendances,b mean (SD)4.51 (5.55)3.63 (4.15)
Emergency inpatient care
Proportion (%)16.1014.790.90 (0.73 to 1.11)
Attendances,b mean (SD)1.32 (0.68)1.32 (0.72)
Bed days,b mean (SD)13.92 (19.03)17.22 (21.77)
Any inpatient care
Proportion (%)69.0560.180.68 (0.58 to 0.79)
Attendances,b mean (SD)3.99 (5.12)3.25 (3.76)
Bed-days,b mean (SD)10.49 (15.19)10.73 (15.38)

Based on link tests, Akaike information criteria, log-link and negative binomial family were chosen for all general linear models to test for significant differences in costs. Six months from diagnosis and 31 days prior to the diagnosis costs for secondary care for patients diagnosed in prison are significantly lower than for the matched cohort diagnosed in the general population (−£1216, 95% CI −£1638 to −£795), with outpatient and planned inpatient care costing significantly less for patients diagnosed in prison (Table 6). Emergency care costs £497 (95% CI £375 to £619) more per patient diagnosed in prison. When the cost of bed-watches and escorts is added to the total cost of secondary care cancer treatment, patients diagnosed in prison cost significantly more per patient than the matched general population cohort.

TABLE 6 Total cancer healthcare costs in 2018–9 GBP
General population (n = 4326)Prison (n = 879)Differencea (95% CI)
(1) Outpatient
Cost,b mean (SD)1651 (1693)1209 (1541)
Adjusteda total cost, mean (SE)1544 (24)981 (33)−563 (−643 to −483)
(2) Elective (planned) inpatient care
Cost,b mean (SD)9382 (9902)9424 (10,633)
Adjusteda total cost, mean (SE)3414 (57)2919 (101)−495 (−715 to −275)
(3) Day cases
Cost,b mean (SD)1516 (1639)1224 (1160)
Adjusteda total cost, mean (SE)685 (11)455 (16)−230 (−267 to −193)
(4) Emergency inpatient care
Cost,b mean (SD)7473 (12,840)8766 (12,729)
Adjusteda total cost, mean (SE)1153 (21)1650 (63)497 (375 to 619)
Total inpatient care (2–4)
Cost,b mean (SD)7619 (11,144)7589 (10,803)
Adjusteda total cost, mean (SE)5234 (82)4601 (157)−634 (−977 to −291)
Total health care costs (1–4)
Adjusteda total cost, mean (SE)6784 (106)5568 (190)−1216 (−1638 to −795)
Total healthcare costs (1–4) including escorts and bed-watches
Adjusteda total cost, mean (SE)6784 (106)17,085 (582)10,301 (9145 to 11,456)

The results for the sensitivity analyses are reported in Appendix 1. If patients with unknown NHS number are excluded from the analysis, the results remain the same as for all other analyses.

← Epidemiological resultsPatient experience results →

Attribution. Elizabeth A Davies; Margreet Lüchtenborg; Rachael Maree Hunter; Renske Visser; Jennie Huynh; Ross Pow et al. (2025). Cancer in English prisons: a mixed-methods study of diagnosis, treatment, care costs and patient and staff experiences. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2025 Davies et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK612288. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Health economic results

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support