Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia: the RELEASE study incorporating a systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis›References

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia: the RELEASE study incorporating a systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 17 min read

  1. The REhabilitation and recovery of peopLE with Aphasia after StrokE (RELEASE) Collaborators. Dosage, intensity, and frequency of language therapy for aphasia: a systematic review-based, individual participant data network meta-analysis. Stroke 2022;53:956–67. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.03521634847708
  2. Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, Fang J, Rowland A, Black S. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:196–202. 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.02020159121
  3. Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;17:35–43. 10.1159/000073896
  4. Stroke Association. Aphasia and its Effects. www.stroke.org.uk/what-is-aphasia/aphasia-and-its-effects (accessed 5 January 2021).
  5. Lam JM, Wodchis WP. The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in Ontario hospital-based long-term care residents. Med Care 2010;48:380–7. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca264720220536
  6. Gialanella B, Prometti P. Rehabilitation length of stay in patients suffering from aphasia after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009;16:437–44. 10.1310/tsr1606-43720139046
  7. Paolucci S, Matano A, Bragoni M, Coiro P, De Angelis D, Fusco FR, et al. Rehabilitation of left brain-damaged ischemic stroke patients: the role of comprehension language deficits. A matched comparison. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;20:400–6. 10.1159/00008867116205059
  8. Gelber DA, Good DC, Laven LJ, Verhulst SJ. Causes of urinary incontinence after acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 1993;24:378–82. 10.1161/01.str.24.3.3788446973
  9. Thomas SA, Lincoln NB. Predictors of emotional distress after stroke. Stroke 2008;39:1240–5. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.49827918292381
  10. Kehayia E, Korner-Bitensky N, Singer F, Becker R, Lamarche M, Georges P, Retik S. Differences in pain medication use in stroke patients with aphasia and without aphasia. Stroke 1997;28:1867–70. 10.1161/01.str.28.10.18679341686
  11. Black-Schaffer RM, Osberg JS. Return to work after stroke: development of a predictive model. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71:285–90.2327878
  12. Mavaddat N, Sadler E, Lim L, Williams K, Warburton E, Kinmonth AL, et al. Perceptions of self-rated health among stroke survivors: a qualitative study in the United Kingdom. BMC Geriatr 2018;18:81. 10.1186/s12877-018-0765-829609550
  13. Bersano A, Burgio F, Gattinoni M, Candelise L, PROSIT Study Group. Aphasia burden to hospitalised acute stroke patients: need for an early rehabilitation programme. Int J Stroke 2009;4:443–7. 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00349.x19930053
  14. Ellis C, Simpson AN, Bonilha H, Mauldin PD, Simpson KN. The one-year attributable cost of poststroke aphasia. Stroke 2012;43:1429–31. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.64733922343643
  15. Boehme AK, Martin-Schild S, Marshall RS, Lazar RM. Effect of aphasia on acute stroke outcomes. Neurology 2016;87:2348–54. 10.1212/WNL.000000000000329727765864
  16. Clarke P, Black SE. Quality of life following stroke: negotiating disability, identity, and resources. J Appl Gerontol 2016;24:319–36. 10.1177/0733464805277976
  17. Parr S, Byng S, Gilpin S, Ireland C. Talking About Aphasia: Living with Loss of Language After Stroke. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1997.
  18. Hilari K, Northcott S. ‘Struggling to stay connected’: comparing the social relationships of healthy older people and people with stroke and aphasia. Aphasiology 2016;31:674–87. 10.1080/02687038.2016.1218436
  19. Wray F, Clarke D. Longer-term needs of stroke survivors with communication difficulties living in the community: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ Open 2017;7:e017944. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017944
  20. Grawburg M, Howe T, Worrall L, Scarinci N. Third-party disability in family members of people with aphasia: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:1324–41. 10.3109/09638288.2012.73534123826903
  21. Cruice M, Worrall L, Hickson L. Quantifying aphasic people’s social lives in the context of non-aphasic peers. Aphasiology 2006;20:1210–25. 10.1080/02687030600790136
  22. Royal College of Physicians. National Clinical Guidline for Stroke. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012. URL: www.strokeaudit.org/Guideline/Historical-Guideline.aspx (accessed 22 August 2014).
  23. Holland A, Fromm D, Forbes M, MacWhinney B. Long-term recovery in stroke accompanied by aphasia: a reconsideration. Aphasiology 2017;31:152–65. 10.1080/02687038.2016.118422128713191
  24. Meinzer M, Djundja D, Barthel G, Elbert T, Rockstroh B. Long-term stability of improved language functions in chronic aphasia after constraint-induced aphasia therapy. Stroke 2005;36:1462–6. 10.1161/01.STR.0000169941.29831.2a15947279
  25. Palmer R, Cooper C, Enderby P, Brady M, Julious S, Bowen A, Latimer N. Clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (Big CACTUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2015;16:18. 10.1186/s13063-014-0527-725623162
  26. Palmer R, Cross L, Harrison M, Bradley E, Witts H, Hughes H, et al. A Study to Assess the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Aphasia Computer Treatment Versus Usual Stimulation or Attention Control Long Term Post Stroke (CACTUS). Sheffield: Sheffield University; 2018. URL: www.sheffield.ac.uk/scharr/sections/dts/ctru/bigcactus (accessed 27 February 2020).
  27. Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists Clinical Guidelines. Oxford: Speechmark Publishing Ltd; 2005. URL: www.rcslt.org/members/publications/rcslt_clinical_guidelines (accessed 22 August 2014).
  28. Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, Kahan T, Von Arbin M. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med 2001;249:413–22. 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2001.00812.x11350565
  29. Ali M, Lyden P, Brady M, VISTA Collaboration. Aphasia and dysarthria in acute stroke: recovery and functional outcome. Int J Stroke 2015;10:400–6. 10.1111/ijs.1206728742466
  30. Wallentin M. Sex differences in post-stroke aphasia rates are caused by age. A meta-analysis and database query. PLOS ONE 2018;13:e0209571. 10.1371/journal.pone.020957130571747
  31. Plowman E, Hentz B, Ellis C. Post-stroke aphasia prognosis: a review of patient-related and stroke-related factors. J Eval Clin Pract 2012;18:689–94. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01650.x21395923
  32. Connor LT, Obler LK, Tocco M, Fitzpatrick PM, Albert ML. Effect of socioeconomic status on aphasia severity and recovery. Brain Lang 2001;78:254–7. 10.1006/brln.2001.245911500074
  33. Reis A, Petersson KM. Educational level, socioeconomic status and aphasia research: a comment on Connor et al. (2001) – effect of socioeconomic status on aphasia severity and recovery. Brain Lang 2003;87:449–52. 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00140-814642547
  34. Paplikar A, Mekala S, Bak TH, Dharamkar S, Alladi S, Kaul S. Bilingualism and the severity of poststroke aphasia. Aphasiology 2018;33:58–72. 10.1080/02687038.2017.1423272
  35. Hope TM, Parker J, Grogan A, Crinion J, Rae J, Ruffle L, et al. Comparing language outcomes in monolingual and bilingual stroke patients. Brain 2015;138:1070–83. 10.1093/brain/awv02025688076
  36. Venna VR, Xu Y, Doran SJ, Patrizz A, McCullough LD. Social interaction plays a critical role in neurogenesis and recovery after stroke. Transl Psychiatry 2014;4:e351. 10.1038/tp.2013.12824473442
  37. Boden-Albala B, Litwak E, Elkind MS, Rundek T, Sacco RL. Social isolation and outcomes post stroke. Neurology 2005;64:1888–92. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000163510.79351.AF15955939
  38. Brady MC, Godwin J, Kelly H, Enderby P, Elders A, Campbell P. Attention control comparisons with SLT for people with aphasia following stroke: methodological concerns raised following a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2018;32:1383–95. 10.1177/026921551878048729911416
  39. Venna VR, McCullough LD. Role of social factors on cell death, cerebral plasticity and recovery after stroke. Metab Brain Dis 2015;30:497–506. 10.1007/s11011-014-9544-124748365
  40. Ali M, Bath PM, Lyden PD, Bernhardt J, Brady M, VISTA Collaboration. Representation of people with aphasia in randomized controlled trials of acute stroke interventions. Int J Stroke 2014;9:174–82. 10.1111/ijs.1204323506193
  41. Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P, Campbell P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;6:CD000425. 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4
  42. Hope TMH, Leff AP, Price CJ. Predicting language outcomes after stroke: is structural disconnection a useful predictor? Neuroimage Clin 2018;19:22–9. 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.03730034998
  43. Thomas SA, Walker MF, Macniven JA, Haworth H, Lincoln NB. Communication and Low Mood (CALM): a randomized controlled trial of behavioural therapy for stroke patients with aphasia. Clin Rehabil 2013;27:398–408. 10.1177/026921551246222723059701
  44. Brownsett SL, Warren JE, Geranmayeh F, Woodhead Z, Leech R, Wise RJ. Cognitive control and its impact on recovery from aphasic stroke. Brain 2014;137:242–54. 10.1093/brain/awt28924163248
  45. Gilmore N, Meier EL, Johnson JP, Kiran S. Nonlinguistic cognitive factors predict treatment-induced recovery in chronic poststroke aphasia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2019;100:1251–8. 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.12.02430639272
  46. Kim G, Min D, Lee EO, Kang EK. Impact of co-occurring dysarthria and aphasia on functional recovery in post-stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40:1010–17. 10.5535/arm.2016.40.6.101028119830
  47. Medical Research Council. Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance. Swindon: Medical Research Council; 2008.
  48. Shrubsole K, Worrall L, Power E, O’Connor DA. Priorities for closing the evidence-practice gaps in poststroke aphasia rehabilitation: a scoping review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018;99:1413–23.e24. 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.47428923500
  49. Franklin S, Harhen D, Hayes M, Demos Mc Manus S, Pollock A. Top 10 research priorities relating to aphasia following stroke. Aphasiology 2017;32:1388–95. 10.1080/02687038.2017.1417539
  50. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, Morelli D, Troisi E, Coiro P, Bragoni M. Early versus delayed inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a matched comparison conducted in Italy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:695–700. 10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90095-910857508
  51. Johansson BB. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation. The Willis lecture. Stroke 2000;31:223–30. 10.1161/01.str.31.1.22310625741
  52. Wahl AS, Schwab ME. Finding an optimal rehabilitation paradigm after stroke: enhancing fiber growth and training of the brain at the right moment. Front Hum Neurosci 2014;8:381. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.0038125018717
  53. Janssen H, Ada L, Bernhardt J, McElduff P, Pollack M, Nilsson M, Spratt NJ. An enriched environment increases activity in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation in a mixed rehabilitation unit: a pilot non-randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil 2014;36:255–62. 10.3109/09638288.2013.78821823627534
  54. Laska AC, Kahan T, Hellblom A, Murray V, von Arbin M. A randomized controlled trial on very early speech and language therapy in acute stroke patients with aphasia. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra 2011;1:66–74. 10.1159/00032983522566984
  55. Nouwens F, de Lau LM, Visch-Brink EG, van de Sandt-Koenderman WM, Lingsma HF, Goosen S, et al. Efficacy of early cognitive-linguistic treatment for aphasia due to stroke: a randomised controlled trial (Rotterdam Aphasia Therapy Study-3). Eur Stroke J 2017;2:126–36. 10.1177/239698731769832729900407
  56. Godecke E, Ciccone NA, Granger AS, Rai T, West D, Cream A, et al. A comparison of aphasia therapy outcomes before and after a Very Early Rehabilitation programme following stroke. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2014;49:149–61. 10.1111/1460-6984.1207424588906
  57. Breitenstein C, Grewe T, Flöel A, Ziegler W, Springer L, Martus P, et al. Intensive speech and language therapy in patients with chronic aphasia after stroke: a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial in a health-care setting. Lancet 2017;389:1528–38. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30067-328256356
  58. The RELEASE Collaboration. Communicating simply, but not too simply: reporting of participants and speech and language interventions for aphasia after stroke. Int J Speech-Lang 2020;22:302–12. 10.1080/17549507.2020.1762000
  59. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Stroke Rehabilitation in Adults. 2013. URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg162 (accessed 14 August 2018).
  60. Royal College of Physicians. National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2016. URL: www.strokeaudit.org/Guideline/Full-Guideline.aspx (accessed 14 August 2018).
  61. Rohde A, Worrall L, Le Dorze G. Systematic review of the quality of clinical guidelines for aphasia in stroke management. J Eval Clin Pract 2013;19:994–1003. 10.1111/jep.1202323448162
  62. Robey RR. The efficacy of treatment for aphasic persons: a meta-analysis. Brain Lang 1994;47:582–608. 10.1006/brln.1994.10607859056
  63. Robey RR. A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998;41:172–87. 10.1044/jslhr.4101.1729493743
  64. Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke 2003;34:987–93. 10.1161/01.STR.0000062343.64383.D0
  65. Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists: Resource Manual for Commissioning and Planning Services for Speech, Language and Communication Needs. London: Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists; 2013.
  66. Code C, Heron C. Services for aphasia, other acquired adult neurogenic communication and swallowing disorders in the United Kingdom, 2000. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:1231–7. 10.1080/0963828031000159996114578063
  67. Katz RC, Hallowell B, Code C, Armstrong E, Roberts P, Pound C, Katz L. A multinational comparison of aphasia management practices. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2000;35:303–14. 10.1080/13682820024720510912257
  68. Verna A, Davidson B, Rose T. Speech–language pathology services for people with aphasia: a survey of current practice in Australia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2009;11:191–205. 10.1080/17549500902726059
  69. Palmer R, Witts H, Chater T. What speech and language therapy do community dwelling stroke survivors with aphasia receive in the UK? PLOS ONE 2018;13:e0200096. 10.1371/journal.pone.020009629990345
  70. Bixley M. In search of consensus on aphasia management. R Coll Speech Lang Ther Bull 2011;18–20.
  71. Royal College of Physicians, Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP), Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP). The Fourth Annual SSNAP Report. Rising to the Challenge: Stroke Care Received Between April 2016 to March 2017. URL: www.strokeaudit.org/Documents/AnnualReport/2016-17-SSNAP-Annual-Report.aspx (accessed 8 June 2020).
  72. Godecke E, Armstrong E, Rai T, Ciccone N, Rose ML, Middleton S, et al. A randomized control trial of intensive aphasia therapy after acute stroke: The Very Early Rehabilitation for SpEech (VERSE) study [published online ahead of print October 6 2020]. Int J Stroke 2020.
  73. Pollock A, St George B, Fenton M, Firkins L. Top 10 research priorities relating to life after stroke – consensus from stroke survivors, caregivers, and health professionals. Int J Stroke 2014;9:313–20. 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00942.x23227818
  74. Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. Aphasia Priority Setting Initiative (In Progress). URL: www.rcslt.org/members/research_centre/research_priorities/RCSLT (accessed 14 August 2018).
  75. Bernhardt J, Godecke E, Johnson L, Langhorne P. Early rehabilitation after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2017;30:48–54. 10.1097/WCO.000000000000040427845945
  76. Pring T. Ask a silly question: two decades of troublesome trials. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2004;39:285–302. 10.1080/1368282041000168121615204442
  77. Godecke E, Rai T, Cadilhac DA, Armstrong E, Middleton S, Ciccone N, et al. Statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the Very Early Rehabilitation in Speech (VERSE) after stroke trial: an international 3-arm clinical trial to determine the effectiveness of early, intensive, prescribed, direct aphasia therapy. Int J Stroke 2018;13:863–80. 10.1177/174749301879005530270762
  78. Knoppers BM. Framework for responsible sharing of genomic and health-related data. Hugo J 2014;8:3. 10.1186/s11568-014-0003-127090251
  79. Taichman DB, Backus J, Baethge C, Bauchner H, de Leeuw PW, Drazen JM, et al. Sharing clinical trial data: a proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Lancet 2016;387:e9–e11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01279-926803441
  80. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4:1. 10.1186/2046-4053-4-125554246
  81. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015;350:g7647. 10.1136/bmj.g764725555855
  82. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:777–84. 10.7326/M14-238526030634
  83. Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Altman DG, Hopewell S, Bastian H, Chalmers I, et al. PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts. PLOS Med 2013;10:e1001419. 10.1371/journal.pmed.100141923585737
  84. Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, Riley RD, Simmonds M, Stewart G, Tierney JF, PRISMA-IPD Development Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement. JAMA 2015;313:1657–65. 10.1001/jama.2015.365625919529
  85. Guise JM, Butler ME, Chang C, Viswanathan M, Pigott T, Tugwell P, Complex Interventions Workgroup. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist. J Clin Epidemiol 2017;90:43–50. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.01628720516
  86. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014;348:g1687. 10.1136/bmj.g168724609605
  87. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, Seers K, Mockford C, Goodlad S, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ 2017;358:j3453. 10.1136/bmj.j345328768629
  88. Meader N, King K, Llewellyn A, Norman G, Brown J, Rodgers M, et al. A checklist designed to aid consistency and reproducibility of GRADE assessments: development and pilot validation. Syst Rev 2014;3:82. 10.1186/2046-4053-3-8225056145
  89. Anglemyer A, Horvath HT, Bero L. Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;4:MR000034. 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2
  90. Faber T, Ravaud P, Riveros C, Perrodeau E, Dechartres A. Meta-analyses including non-randomized studies of therapeutic interventions: a methodological review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016;16:35. 10.1186/s12874-016-0136-027004721
  91. Abo-Zaid G, Sauerbrei W, Riley RD. Individual participant data meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies: state of the art? BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:56. 10.1186/1471-2288-12-5622530717
  92. Brady M, Ali M, VandenBerg K, Williams LJ, Williams LR, Abo M, et al. RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and netwrok meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia. Aphasiology 2020;34:137–57.
  93. Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose T, Le Dorze G, Cruice M, Isaksen J, et al. Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? An international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disabil Rehabil 2017;39:1364–79. 10.1080/09638288.2016.119489927345867
  94. Dietz A, Boyle M. Discourse measurement in aphasia research: have we reached the tipping point? Aphasiology 2017;32:459–64. 10.1080/02687038.2017.1398803
  95. Bryant L, Ferguson A, Spencer E. Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: a review of the literature. Clin Linguist Phon 2016;30:489–518. 10.3109/02699206.2016.114574027002416
  96. Xiong T, Bunning K, Horton S, Hartley S. Assessing and comparing the outcome measures for the rehabilitation of adults with communication disorders in randomised controlled trials: an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health approach. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:2272–90. 10.3109/09638288.2011.56866621473703
  97. El Hachioui H, Visch-Brink EG, de Lau LM, van de Sandt-Koenderman MW, Nouwens F, Koudstaal PJ, Dippel DW. Screening tests for aphasia in patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Neurol 2017;264:211–20. 10.1007/s00415-016-8170-827260296
  98. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0. (updated July 2019). Cochrane; 2019. URL: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook (accessed 27 February 2019).
  99. Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for Use in JBI Systematic Reviews. 2018. URL: http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html (accessed 20 November 2018).
  100. Brady MC, Ali M, VandenBerg K, Williams LJ, Williams LR, Abo M, et al. RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta-and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia. Aphasiology 2020;34:137–57.
  101. Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Pan HC, Clarke M, et al. Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 2012;379:432–44. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61625-522152853
  102. van der Waerden BL. Order tests for the two-sample problem and their power. Proc Kon Nederl Akad Wetensch 1952;A:453–8. 10.1016/S1385-7258(52)50063-5
  103. Tierney JF, Pignon JP, Gueffyier F, Clarke M, Askie L, Vale CL, Burdett S, Cochrane IPD Meta-analysis Methods Group. How individual participant data meta-analyses have influenced trial design, conduct, and analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68:1325–35. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.02426186982
  104. Debray TP, Schuit E, Efthimiou O, Reitsma JB, Ioannidis JP, Salanti G, et al. An overview of methods for network meta-analysis using individual participant data: when do benefits arise? Stat Methods Med Res 2018;27:1351–64. 10.1177/096228021666074127487843
  105. Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, et al. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;69:225–34. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.00526092286
  106. Ahmed I, Sutton AJ, Riley RD. Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey. BMJ 2012;344:d7762. 10.1136/bmj.d776222214758
  107. Liebeskind DS, Kidwell CS, Sayre JW, Saver JL. Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials. Neurology 2006;67:973–9. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000237331.16541.ac17000963
  108. Wu D-M. Alternative tests of independence between stochastic regressors and disturbances. Econometrica 1973;41:733–50. 10.2307/1914093
  109. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;9:CD000197.
  110. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials. Stroke 1997;28:2139–44. 10.1161/01.STR.28.11.21399368554
  111. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:380–2. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.01121185693
  112. Williams LR, Ali M, VandenBerg K, Williams LJ, Abo M, Becker F, et al. Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke. Aphasiology 2022;36:513–33. 10.1080/02687038.2021.1897081
  113. Brady MC, Ali M, VandenBerg K, Williams LJ, Williams LR, Abo M, et al. Communicating simply, but not too simply: reporting of participants and speech and language interventions for aphasia after stroke. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2020;22:302–12.32686592
  114. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Dávalos A, Guidetti D, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1317–29. 10.1056/NEJMoa080465618815396
  115. Silvestrelli G, Parnetti L, Paciaroni M, Caso V, Corea F, Vitali R, et al. Early admission to stroke unit influences clinical outcome. Eur J Neurol 2006;13:250–5. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01187.x16618341
  116. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1994;25:808–13. 10.1161/01.str.25.4.8088160225
  117. Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W. Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2002;33:179–85. 10.1161/hs0102.10122411779908
  118. The REhabilitation and recovery of peopLE with Aphasia after StrokE (RELEASE) Collaborators, Ali M, VandenBerg K, Williams LJ, Williams LR, Abo M, et al. Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery. Stroke 2021;52:1778–87. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.03116233719515
  119. Seghier ML, Patel E, Prejawa S, Ramsden S, Selmer A, Lim L, et al. The PLORAS Database: a data repository for Predicting Language Outcome and Recovery After Stroke. Neuroimage 2016;124:1208–12. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.08325882753
  120. Fyndanis V, Lind M, Varlokosta S, Kambanaros M, Soroli E, Ceder K, et al. Cross-linguistic adaptations of The Comprehensive Aphasia Test: challenges and solutions. Clin Linguist Phon 2017;31:697–710. 10.1080/02699206.2017.131029928448766
  121. Bowen A, Hesketh A, Patchick E, Young A, Davies L, Vail A, et al. Effectiveness of enhanced communication therapy in the first four months after stroke for aphasia and dysarthria: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2012;345:e4407. 10.1136/bmj.e440722797843
  122. Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose T, Le Dorze G, Breitenstein C, Hilari K, et al. A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement. Int J Stroke 2019;14:180–5. 10.1177/174749301880620030303810
  123. Godecke E, Rai T, Ciccone N, Armstrong E, Granger A, Hankey GJ. Amount of therapy matters in very early aphasia rehabilitation after stroke: a clinical prognostic model. Semin Speech Lang 2013;34:129–41. 10.1055/s-0033-135836924166188
  124. Luker JA, Bernhardt J, Grimmer-Somers KA. Demographic and stroke-related factors as predictors of quality of acute stroke care provided by allied health professionals. J Multidiscip Healthc 2011;4:247–59. 10.2147/JMDH.S2256921847347
  125. Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, English C, Ali M, Churilov L, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke 2017;12:451–61. 10.1177/174749301771181328697709
  126. Boyd LA, Hayward KS, Ward NS, Stinear CM, Rosso C, Fisher RJ, et al. Biomarkers of stroke recovery: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017;31:864–76. 10.1177/154596831773268029233071
  127. Moss A, Nicholas M. Language rehabilitation in chronic aphasia and time postonset: a review of single-subject data. Stroke 2006;37:3043–51. 10.1161/01.STR.0000249427.74970.1517095735
  128. Brady MC, Fredrick A, Williams B. People with aphasia: capacity to consent, research participation and intervention inequalities. Int J Stroke 2013;8:193–6. 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00900.x23130972
  129. Jayes MJ, Palmer RL. Stroke research staff’s experiences of seeking consent from people with communication difficulties: results of a national online survey. Top Stroke Rehabil 2014;21:443–51. 10.1310/tsr2105-44325341389
  130. Reynolds AL, Vick JL, Haak NJ. Telehealth applications in speech-language pathology: a modified narrative review. J Telemed Telecare 2009;15:310–16. 10.1258/jtt.2009.08121519720769
  131. Vale CL, Rydzewska LH, Rovers MM, Emberson JR, Gueyffier F, Stewart LA, Cochrane IPD Meta-analysis Methods Group. Uptake of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual participant data in clinical practice guidelines: descriptive study. BMJ 2015;350:h1088. 10.1136/bmj.h108825747860
  132. The RELEASE Collaborators. Communicating simply, but not too simply: reporting of participants and speech and language interventions for aphasia after stroke. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2020;22:302–12.32686592
  133. Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin 1945;1:80–3. 10.2307/3001968
  134. Cochran WG. The χ2 test of goodness of fit. Ann Math Statist 1952;23:315–45. 10.1214/aoms/1177729380
  135. De Renzi E, Vignolo LA. The Token Test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain 1962;85:665–78. 10.1093/brain/85.4.66514026018
  136. De Renzi E, Faglioni P. Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the Token Test. Cortex 1978;14:41–9. 10.1016/S0010-9452(78)80006-916295108
  137. Arvedson JC, McNeil MR, West TL. Prediction of Revised Token Test overall, subtest, and linguistic unit scores by two shortened versions. Clinical Aphasiology 1986;16:57–63.
  138. Lincoln NB. An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Language Retraining Methods with Aphasic Stroke Patients. PhD thesis. London: University of London; 1979.
  139. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn 1980;6:174–215. 10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.1747373248
← Discussion and conclusionsAcknowledgements →

Attribution. Marian C Brady; Myzoon Ali; Kathryn VandenBerg; Linda J Williams; Louise R Williams; Masahiro Abo et al. (2022). Complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia: the RELEASE study incorporating a systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © King’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2022. This work was produced by Brady et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK584830. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support