Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study›References

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 28 min read

  1. NHS England. GP Contract 2019. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/gp/gpfv/investment/gp-contract/ (accessed 3 May 2019).
  2. UK Department of Health and Social Care. A Plan for Digital Health and Social Care. Appendix A: Our Action Plan for Delivering a Digital Future 2022. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-plan-for-digital-health-and-social-care/a-plan-for-digital-health-and-social-care (accessed 17 January 2023).
  3. Clarke G, Dias A, Wolters A. Access to and Delivery of General Practice Services: A Study of Patients at Practices Using Digital and Online Tools. London: The Health Foundation; 2022. URL: www.health.org.uk/publications/access-to-and-delivery-of-general-practice-services (accessed 17 January 2023).
  4. Wikipedia. British Government Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Wikipedia. 2022. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_government_response_to_the_COVID-19_pandemic#Initial_response (accessed 17 January 2023).
  5. British Medical Association. Pressures in General Practice Data Analysis. September 2022. URL: www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/nhs-delivery-and-workforce/pressures/pressures-in-general-practice-data-analysis (accessed 23 January 2023).
  6. Campbell JL, Fletcher E, Britten N, Green C, Holt TA, Lattimer V, et al. Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis. Lancet 2014;384:1859–68. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61058-825098487
  7. Clarke G, Pariza P, Wolters A. How Has COVID-19 Affected Service Delivery in GP Practices that Offered Remote Consultations before the Pandemic? The Health Foundation; 2020. www.health.org.uk/news-and-comment/charts-and-infographics/how-has-covid-19-affected-service-delivery-in-gp-practices (accessed 10 January 2023).
  8. Nuffield Trust, The Health Foundation. QualityWatch: The Remote Care Revolution During COVID-19. December. 2020. URL: www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resource/the-remote-care-revolution-in-the-nhs-understanding-impacts-and-attitudes (accessed 17 January 2023).
  9. NHS England. Updates and Guidance for General Practice. March 2020. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/publication/preparedness-letters-for-general-practice/ (accessed 24 January 2023).
  10. Horton T, Hardie T, Mahadeva S, Warburton W. Securing a Positive Health Care Technology Legacy from COVID-19. London; 2021. URL: www.health.org.uk/publications/long-reads/securing-a-positive-health-care-technology-legacy-from-covid-19 (accessed 24 February 2023).
  11. Hutchings R. The Impact of COVID-19 on the Use of Digital Technology in the NHS. Nuffield Trust; 2020. URL: www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2020-08/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-the-use-of-digital-technology-in-the-nhs-web-2.pdf (accessed 23 January 2023).
  12. Murphy M, Scott LJ, Salisbury C, Turner A, Scott A, Denholm R, et al. Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods longitudinal study. Br J Gener Pract 2021;71:e166–77. 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0948
  13. Ipsos MORI. GP Patient Survey: National Report – 2022 Survey. Ipsos MORI; 2022. URL: www.gp-patient.co.uk/downloads/2022/GPPS_2022_National_report_PUBLIC.pdf (accessed 5 August 2022).
  14. Litchfield I, Shukla D, Greenfield S. Impact of COVID-19 on the digital divide: a rapid review. BMJ Open 2021;11:e053440. 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053440
  15. Marjanovic S, Sim M, Dubow T, Corbett J, Harte E, Parks S, et al. Innovation as a Driver of Quality and Productivity in UK Healthcare: Creating and Connecting Receptive Places: Emerging Insights Report. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2017. URL: www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1845.html (accessed 17 January 2023).
  16. Mold F, de Lusignan S, Sheikh A, Majeed A, Wyatt JC, Quinn T, et al. Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic review in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2015;65:e141–51. 10.3399/bjgp15X68394125733435
  17. Mold F, de Lusignan S. Patients’ online access to their primary care electronic health records and linked online services: implications for research and practice. J Personal Med 2015;5(4):452–69. 10.3390/jpm5040452
  18. Zhang M, Zhang C, Sun Q, Cai Q, Yang H, Zhang Y. Questionnaire survey about use of an online appointment booking system in one large tertiary public hospital outpatient service center in China. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2014;14:49. 10.1186/1472-6947-14-4924912568
  19. Green A, Bramley G, Annibal I, Sellick J. Rural Workforce Issues in Health and Care.Birmingham; 2018. URL: www.ncrhc.org/news/rural-workforce-issues-in-health-and-care (accessed 17 January 2023).
  20. NHS England. GP Online Services: What GP Practices Need to Do. 2022. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/gp-online-services/about-the-prog/gp-practices/ (accessed 17 January 2023).
  21. UK Government Central Digital and Data Office. Transforming for a Digital Future: 2022 to 2025 Roadmap for Digital and Data. 2022. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/roadmap-for-digital-and-data-2022-to-2025/transforming-for-a-digital-future-2022-to-2025-roadmap-for-digital-and-data (accessed 17 January 2023).
  22. NHS England. GP Five Year Forward View. London: Department of Health; 2016. URL: www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/nhs-five-year-forward-view (accessed 17 January 2023).
  23. Imison C, Castle-Clarke S, Watson RE, Edwards N. Delivering the Benefits of Digital Health Care. London: Nuffield Trust; 2017. URL: www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/research/delivering-the-benefits-of-digital-health-care (accessed 24 January 2023).
  24. Public Health Wales, King’s Fund. Digital Technology and Health Inequalities: A Scoping Review. The King’s Fund; 2022. URL: https://kingsfund.blogs.com/health_management/2020/12/digital-technology-and-health-inequalities-a-scoping-review.html (accessed 24 January 2023).
  25. McKinsey and Company. Telehealth: A Quarter-Trillion-Dollar Post-COVID-19 Reality? 2021. URL: www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/telehealth-a-quarter-trillion-dollar-post-covid-19-reality (accessed 17 January 2023).
  26. IQVIA Institute. The Growing Value of Digital Health. November 2017. URL: www.iqvia.com/insights/the-iqvia-institute/reports/the-growing-value-of-digital-health (accessed 24 January 2023).
  27. Buttlar M. The State of European Digital Health Investments. June 2022. URL: https://medium.com/birds-view/the-state-of-european-digital-health-investments-9f4e4d01b075 (accessed 24 January 2023).
  28. Kwasnicka D, Keller J, Perski O, Potthoff S, Ten Hoor GA, Ainsworth B, et al. White paper: open digital health – accelerating transparent and scalable health promotion and treatment. Health Psychol Rev 2022;16:475–91. 10.1080/17437199.2022.204648235240931
  29. Lambert JD, Elliott LR, Taylor AH, Farrand P, Haase AM, Greaves CJ. A novel method for assessing design fidelity in web-based behavioral interventions. Health Psychol 2021;40:217–25. 10.1037/hea000104633630643
  30. NHS Digital. Why Digital Inclusion Matters to Health and Social Care. London: NHS Digital; 2022. URL: https://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/corporate-information-and-documents/digital-inclusion/digital-inclusion-in-health-and-social-care (accessed 23 January 2023).
  31. Good Things Foundation. Widening Digital Participation Programme.2022. URL: www.goodthingsfoundation.org/what-we-do/our-partnerships/health-and-wellbeing/widening-digital-participation/ (accessed 23 January 2023).
  32. Justeconomics. Digital Inclusion: The Social Return on Investment. London; 2016. URL: www.justeconomics.co.uk/uploads/reports/Just-Economics-BT-Digital-Inclusion-SROI.pdf (accessed 28 February 2023).
  33. NHS England. Our Funding.2022. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/publications/business-plan/our-2022-23-business-plan/our-funding/ (accessed 24 January 2023).
  34. Open Government Licence. Open Government Licence for Public Sector Information. The National Archives; 2017. URL: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ (accessed 28 February 2023).
  35. NHS England. GP Online Services: The Key Benefits. 2018. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/gp-online-services/learning-so-far/key-benefits/ (accessed 17 January 2023).
  36. Atherton H, Ziebland S. What do we need to consider when planning, implementing and researching the use of alternatives to face-to-face consultations in primary healthcare? Digit Health 2016;2:75559. 10.1177/2055207616675559
  37. Huh J, Koola J, Contreras A, Castillo AK, Ruiz M, Tedone KG, et al. Consumer health informatics adoption among underserved populations: thinking beyond the digital divide. Yearb Med Inform 2018;27:146–55. 10.1055/s-0038-164121730157518
  38. Phelps RG, Taylor J, Simpson K, Samuel J, Turner AN. Patients’ continuing use of an online health record: a quantitative evaluation of 14,000 patient years of access data. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e241. 10.2196/jmir.337125344621
  39. Cochrane Methods Equity. PROGRESS-Plus: Cochrane.2021. URL: https://methods.cochrane.org/equity/projects/evidence-equity/progress-plus (accessed 17 January 2023).
  40. NHS England. Definitions for Health Inequalities (Archived 01-11-2021). NHS England; 2021. URL: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20211101142006/https://www.england.nhs.uk/ltphimenu/definitions-for-health-inequalities/#inclusion-health-groups (accessed 17 January 2023).
  41. Barclays Bank Ltd. Barclays Digital Eagles. London; 2018. URL: www.barclays.co.uk/digital-confidence/eagles/ (accessed 17 January 2023).
  42. Lankshear C, Knobel M. Digital Literacies. New York: Peter Lang; 2022.
  43. Rowlands G. Health Literacy and Digital Literacy: Importance and Next Steps.University of Newcastle, UK; 2020. URL: https://pifonline.org.uk/download/file/490/ (accessed 15 September 2022).
  44. Kim H, Xie B. Health literacy in the eHealth era: a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 2017;100:1073–82. 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.01528174067
  45. Jenkins CL, Imran S, Mahmood A, Bradbury K, Murray E, Stevenson F, Hamilton FL. Digital health intervention design and deployment for engaging demographic groups likely to be affected by the digital divide: protocol for a systematic scoping review. JMIR Res Protoc 2022;11:e32538. 10.2196/3253835302946
  46. Konttila J, Siira H, Kyngäs H, Lahtinen M, Elo S, Kääriäinen M, et al. Healthcare professionals’ competence in digitalisation: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs 2019;28:745–61. 10.1111/jocn.1471030376199
  47. Verma P, Kerrison R. Patients’ and physicians’ experiences with remote consultations in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-method rapid review of the literature. BJGP Open 2022;6:e0192. 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0192
  48. Shachar L. ‘You become a slightly better doctor’: doctors adopting integrated medical expertise through interactions with E-patients. Soc Sci Med 2022;305:115038. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.11503835598443
  49. Glasziou P, Straus S, Brownlee S, Trevena L, Dans L, Guyatt G, et al. Evidence for underuse of effective medical services around the world. Lancet 2017;390:169–77. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30946-128077232
  50. NHS England. Using Online Consultations in Primary Care: Implementation Toolkit.2020. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/publication/using-online-consultations-in-primary-care-implementation-toolkit/ (accessed 17 January 2023).
  51. Reiners F, Sturm J, Bouw LJ, Wouters EJ. Sociodemographic factors influencing the use of eHealth in people with chronic diseases. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:645. 10.3390/ijerph1604064530795623
  52. Irizarry T, Dabbs AD, Curran CR. Patient portals and patient engagement: a state of the science review. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e148. 10.2196/jmir.425526104044
  53. Xiao N, Sharman R, Rao HR, Upadhyaya S. Factors influencing online health information search: an empirical analysis of a national cancer-related survey. Decis Support Syst 2014;57:417–27. 10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.047
  54. McKinstry B. ViCo (Video Conferencing) Study. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh; 2021. URL: www.ed.ac.uk/usher/telescot/projects/completed-projects/vico (accessed 17 January 2023).
  55. Donaghy E, Atherton H, Hammersley V, Mcneilly H, Bikker A, Robbins L, et al. The benefits, challenges, and acceptability of video consultation with patients via the internet in general practice. BJGP 2019;69:e586–e94. 10.3399/bjgp19X70414131160368
  56. Howells K, Amp M, Burrows M, Brown J, Brennan R, Dickinson J, et al. Remote primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic for people experiencing homelessness: a qualitative study. Br J Gener Pract: J Royal Coll Gener Pract 2022;72:e492–500. 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0596
  57. Beacom AM, Newman SJ. Communicating health information to disadvantaged populations. Fam Commun Health 2010;33(2):152–62. www.jstor.org/stable/44954183.
  58. O’Connor S, Hanlon P, O’Donnell CA, Garcia S, Glanville J, Mair FS. Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016;16:1–15. 10.1186/s12911-016-0359-326754574
  59. Horwood J. Investigating the Unintended Consequences of the Use of Digital Health Tools in Primary Care. London: NIHR School for Primary Care Research; 2018. URL: www.spcr.nihr.ac.uk/projects/408-investigating-the-unintended-consequences-of-the-use-of-digital-health-tools-in-primary-care (accessed 4 May 2019).
  60. Seguin M, Hall L, Atherton H, Barnes R, Leydon G, Murray E, et al. Protocol paper for the ‘Harnessing resources from the internet to maximise outcomes from GP consultations (HaRI)’ study: a mixed qualitative methods study. BMJ Open 2018;8:e024188. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024188
  61. NHS England. Getting Ready for Patients to Have Access to Their Future Information. NHS England Events; 2022. URL: www.events.england.nhs.uk/getting-ready-for-all-patients-to-have-access-to-their-future-data (accessed 17 January 2023).
  62. Yang M, Pollard J, Garrod B, Marjanovic S, Sussex J. Evaluating the impact of the Eastern Academic Health Science Network Transformation Support Unit (Product Page). RANDeurope; 2018. URL: www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2639.html (accessed 2 February 2023).
  63. Primary Care Projects Associates Ltd. Primary Care Demand and Capacity Audit: Analysis of Survey Information Collected from Lower Lea Valley Locality GP Practices, Minor Injury Unit (MIU) and Community Pharmacy. Surrey: Primary Care Projects Associates Ltd; Surrey 2016.
  64. Sakaguchi-Tang DK, Bosold AL, Choi YK, Turner AM. Patient portal use and experience among older adults: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform 2017;5:e38. 10.2196/medinform.8092.29038093
  65. Amante DJ, Hogan TP, Pagoto SL, English TM. A systematic review of electronic portal usage among patients with diabetes. Diabet Technol Therap 2014;16:784–93. 10.1089/dia.2014.0078
  66. Jenkinson CE, Asprey A, Clark CE, Richards SH. Patients’ willingness to attend the NHS cardiovascular health checks in primary care: a qualitative interview study. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:33. 10.1186/s12875-015-0244-725879731
  67. NHS Digital. NHS App Pilot Research Findings 2019. URL: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/nhs-app/nhs-app-pilot-research-report#document-content (accessed 17 January 2023).
  68. Cowie J, Calveley E, Bowers G, Bowers J. Evaluation of a digital consultation and self-care advice tool in primary care: a multi-methods study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:896. 10.3390/ijerph1505089629724040
  69. Kalichman SC, Cherry C, Cain D, Pope H, Kalichman M, Eaton L, et al. Internet-based health information consumer skills intervention for people living with HIV/AIDS. J Consult Clin Psychol 2006;74:545–54. 10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.54516822111
  70. Weiss C. Theory-based Evaluation: Past, Present, and Future. In Rog DJ, Fournier D, editors. Progress and Future Directions in Evaluation: Perspectives on Theory, Practice and Methods New Directions for Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997. pp. 41–55.
  71. Pawson R, TilleyN. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.
  72. The UK Public Involvement Standards Development Partnership. UK Standards for Public Involvement. 2019. URL: https://sites.google.com/nihr.ac.uk/pi-standards/home (accessed 2 February 2023).
  73. Liabo K, Boddy K, Burchmore H, Cockcroft E, Britten N. Clarifying the roles of patients in research. Br J Sports Med 2019;53:1324. 10.1136/bjsports-2018-k1463rep31582520
  74. Leach B, Parkinson S, Gkousis E, Abel G, Atherton H, Campbell J, et al. Facilitation to support patient access to web-based primary care services: scoping literature review. J Med Internet Res 2022;24:e33911. 10.2196/3391135834301
  75. Creative Commons. Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). 2020. URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (accessed 28 February 2023).
  76. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid-Based Healthc 2015;13:141–6. 10.1097/XEB.000000000000005026134548
  77. University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. PROSPERO: Registering a Review on PROSPERO. York: National Institute for Health Research; 2020. URL: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#guidancenotes (accessed 17 January 2023).
  78. Leach B, Evangelos G, Parkinson S, Newbould J, Sussex J. Digital Facilitation to Support Patient Access to Online Primary Care Services. National Institute for Health Research; University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2020. URL: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=189019 (accessed 7 February 2023).
  79. Ryan R. Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group: Data Synthesis and Analysis. Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group; 2013. URL: http://cccrg.cochrane.org/sites/cccrg.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Analysis.pdf (accessed 17 January 2023).
  80. Nguyen AD, Frensham LJ, Baysari MT, Carland JE, Day RO. Patients’ use of mobile health applications: what general practitioners think. Fam Pract 2019;36:214–8. 10.1093/fampra/cmy05229873708
  81. Grossman LV, Creber RM, Benda NC, Wright D, Vawdrey DK, Ancker JS. Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review. J Am Med Inf Assoc 2019;26:855–70. 10.1093/jamia/ocz023
  82. Greenhalgh T, Hinder S, Stramer K, Bratan T, Russell J. Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: case study of HealthSpace. Br Med J 2010;341:c5814. 10.1136/bmj.c581421081595
  83. Carter M, Fletcher E, Sansom A, Warren FC, Campbell JL. Feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of an online alternative to face-to-face consultation in general practice: a mixed-methods study of webGP in six Devon practices. BMJ Open 2018;8:e018688. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018688
  84. Plaete J, Crombez G, DeSmet A, Deveugele M, Verloigne M, De Bourdeaudhuij I. What do general practitioners think about an online self-regulation programme for health promotion? Focus group interviews. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:3. 10.1186/s12875-014-0214-525608851
  85. Hjelmager DM, Vinther LD, Poulsen SH, Petersen LS, Jensen MB, Riis A. Requirements for implementing online information material for patients with low back pain in general practice: an interview study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2019;37:60–8. 10.1080/02813432.2019.156941330700191
  86. Ebert DD, Berking M, Cuijpers P, Lehr D, Pörtner M, Baumeister H. Increasing the acceptance of internet-based mental health interventions in primary care patients with depressive symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord 2015;176:9–17. 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.05625682378
  87. du Pon E, Kleefstra N, Cleveringa F, van Dooren A, Heerdink ER, van Dulmen S. Effects of the proactive interdisciplinary self-management (PRISMA) program on online care platform usage in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. J Diabetes Res 2020;2020:5013142. 10.1155/2020/501314232016122
  88. Shaw EK, Howard J, West DR, Crabtree BF, Nease DE, Tutt B, Nutting PA. The role of the champion in primary care change efforts: from the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP). J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:676–85. 10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.11028122956703
  89. Possemato K, Kuhn E, Johnson E, Hoffman JE, Owen JE, Kanuri N, et al. Using PTSD Coach in primary care with and without clinician support: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2016;38:94–8. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.09.005.26589765
  90. van Middelaar T, Beishuizen CRL, Guillemont J, Barbera M, Richard E, Moll van Charante EP; HATICE Consortium. Engaging older people in an internet platform for cardiovascular risk self-management: a qualitative study among Dutch HATICE participants. BMJ Open 2018;8:e019683. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019683
  91. Abidi S, Vallis M, Piccinini-Vallis H, Imran SA, Abidi SSR. Diabetes-related behavior change knowledge transfer to primary care practitioners and patients: implementation and evaluation of a digital health platform. JMIR Med Inform 2018;6:e25. 10.2196/medinform.962929669705
  92. Hardiker NR, Grant MJ. Barriers and facilitators that affect public engagement with eHealth services. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;160:13–7. 10.3233/978-1-60750-588-4-1320841641
  93. Abbott-Garner P, Richardson J, Jones RB. The impact of superfast broadband, tailored booklets for households, and discussions with general practitioners on personal electronic health readiness: cluster factorial quasi-randomized control trial. J Med Internet Res 2019;21:e11386. 10.2196/1138630855234
  94. Lopez Segui F, Pratdepadua Bufill C, Abdon Gimenez N, Martinez Roldan J, Garcia Cuyas F. The prescription of mobile apps by primary care teams: a pilot project in Catalonia. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;6:e10701. 10.2196/1070129929948
  95. Bernhard G, Mahler C, Seidling HM, Stützle M, Ose D, Baudendistel I, et al. Developing a shared patient-centered, web-based medication platform for type 2 diabetes patients and their health care providers: qualitative study on user requirements. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e105. 10.2196/jmir.866629588269
  96. Mahoney N, Gladstone T, DeFrino D, Stinson A, Nidetz J, Canel J, et al. Prevention of adolescent depression in primary care: barriers and relational work solutions. Calif J Health Promot 2017;15:1–12. URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6214481/pdf/nihms-990620.pdf (accessed 17 January 2023).30393470
  97. Molleda L, Bahamon M, St George SM, Perrino T, Estrada Y, Correa Herrera D, et al. Clinic personnel, facilitator, and parent perspectives of eHealth Familias Unidas in primary care. J Pediatr Health Care 2017;31:350–61. 10.1016/j.pedhc.2016.11.00128012799
  98. Byambasuren O, Beller E, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. mHealth app prescription in Australian general practice: pre-post study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8:e16497. 10.2196/1649732478660
  99. Castle-Clarke S, Imison C. The Digital Patient: Transforming Primary Care? London: Nuffield Trust; 2016. URL: www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2019-08/nt-the-digital-patient-web-update-august-2019.pdf (accessed 18 January 2023).
  100. Aarts JW, Faber MJ, Cohlen BJ, Van Oers A, Nelen WL, Kremer JA. Lessons learned from the implementation of an online infertility community into an IVF clinic’s daily practice. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2015;18:238–47. 10.3109/14647273.2015.105790126167659
  101. Hoffmann M, Hartmann M, Wensing M, Friederich HC, Haun MW. Potential for integrating mental health specialist video consultations in office-based routine primary care: cross-sectional qualitative study among family physicians. J Med Internet Res 2019;21:e13382. 10.2196/1338231429419
  102. Lipschitz J, Miller CJ, Hogan TP, Burdick KE, Lippin-Foster R, Simon SR, Burgess J. Adoption of mobile apps for depression and anxiety: cross-sectional survey study on patient interest and barriers to engagement. JMIR Ment Health 2019;6:e11334. 10.2196/1133430681968
  103. Hassett L, van den Berg M, Lindley RI, Crotty M, McCluskey A, van der Ploeg HP, et al. Digitally enabled aged care and neurological rehabilitation to enhance outcomes with Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) in Australia: a randomised controlled trial. PLOS Med 2020;17:e1003029. 10.1371/journal.pmed.100302932069288
  104. Reynolds J, Griffiths KM, Cunningham JA, Bennett K, Bennett A. Clinical practice models for the use of e-mental health resources in primary health care by health professionals and peer workers: a conceptual framework. JMIR Ment Health 2015;2:e6. 10.2196/mental.420026543912
  105. Coulter A, Mearns B. Developing Care for a Changing Population: Patient Engagement and Health Information Technology. London: Nuffield Trust; 2016. URL: www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2017-01/patient-engagement-and-health-information-web-final.pdf (accessed 18 January 2023).
  106. Ronda MCM, Dijkhorst-Oei LT, Vos RC, Rutten G. Diabetes care providers’ opinions and working methods after four years of experience with a diabetes patient web portal; a survey among health care providers in general practices and an outpatient clinic. BMC Fam Pract 2018;19:94. 10.1186/s12875-018-0781-y29929483
  107. Slevin P, Kessie T, Cullen J, Butler MW, Donnelly SC, Caulfield B. Exploring the barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health technologies for the management of COPD: a qualitative study of clinician perceptions. QJM 2020;113:163–72. 10.1093/qjmed/hcz24131545374
  108. Rodgers M, Raine G, Thomas S, Harden M, Eastwood A. Informing NHS policy in ‘digital-first primary care’: a rapid evidence synthesis. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2019;7:1–124. 10.3310/hsdr07410
  109. Longacre M, Grande S, Hager A, Montan M, Bergquist RP, Martensson M, Kotzbauer G. Clinical adoption of mHealth technology to support pediatric cystic fibrosis care in Sweden: qualitative case study. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2018;1:e11080. 10.2196/1108031518297
  110. Webb MJ, Wadley G, Sanci LA. Experiences of general practitioners and practice support staff using a health and lifestyle screening app in primary health care: implementation case study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2018;6:e105. 10.2196/mhealth.877829691209
  111. Zarski AC, Berking M, Reis D, Lehr D, Buntrock C, Schwarzer R, Ebert DD. Turning good intentions into actions by using the health action process approach to predict adherence to internet-based depression prevention: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e9. 10.2196/jmir.881429326097
  112. Radovic A, Odenthal K, Flores AT, Miller E, Stein BD. Prescribing technology to increase uptake of depression treatment in primary care: a pre-implementation focus group study of SOVA (Supporting Our Valued Adolescents). J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2019;27:766–82. 10.1007/s10880-019-09669-5
  113. Delbanco T, Walker J, Bell SK, Darer JD, Elmore JG, Farag N, et al. Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:461–70. 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-0000223027317
  114. Nijland N, van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Kelders SM, Brandenburg BJ, Seydel ER. Factors influencing the use of a Web-based application for supporting the self-care of patients with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res 2011;13:e71. 10.2196/jmir.160321959968
  115. Lyles CR, Tieu L, Sarkar U, Kiyoi S, Sadasivaiah S, Hoskote M, et al. A randomized trial to train vulnerable primary care patients to use a patient portal. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;32:248–58. 10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.18026330850461
  116. North F, Hanna BK, Crane SJ, Smith SA, Tulledge-Scheitel SM, Stroebel RJ. Patient portal doldrums: does an exam room promotional video during an office visit increase patient portal registrations and portal use? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:i24–7. 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-00038121976028
  117. Lin JX, Faust B, Ebert DD, Kramer L, Baumeister H. A web-based acceptance-facilitating intervention for identifying patients’ acceptance, uptake, and adherence of internet and mobile-based pain interventions: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e244. 10.2196/jmir.992530131313
  118. Baumeister H, Seifferth H, Lin J, Nowoczin L, Lüking M, Ebert D. Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on patients’ acceptance of internet-based pain interventions: A randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain 2015;31:528–35. 10.1097/AJP.000000000000011824866854
  119. Ramsey A, Lanzo E, Huston-Paterson H, Tomaszewski K, Trent M. Increasing patient portal usage: preliminary outcomes from the MyChart Genius project. J Adolesc Health 2018; 62:29–35. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.02929169768
  120. Ford JH, 2nd, Alagoz E, Dinauer S, Johnson KA, Pe-Romashko K, Gustafson DH. Successful organizational strategies to sustain use of A-CHESS: a mobile intervention for individuals with alcohol use disorders. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e201. 10.2196/jmir.396526286257
  121. Sieck CJ, Hefner JL, Schnierle J, Florian H, Agarwal A, Rundell K, McAlearney AS. The rules of engagement: perspectives on secure messaging from experienced ambulatory patient portal users. JMIR Med Inform 2017;5:e13. 10.2196/medinform.751628676467
  122. Patel V, Hale TM, Palakodeti S, Kvedar JC, Jethwani K. Prescription tablets in the digital age: a cross-sectional study exploring patient and physician attitudes toward the use of tablets for clinic-based personalized health care information exchange. JMIR Res Protoc 2015;4:e116. 10.2196/resprot.380626481906
  123. Abidi S, Vallis M, Piccinini-Vallis H, Imran SA, Abidi SS. A decision support environment to design personalized behavior modification plans for diabetes self-management. Eur J Epidemiol 2016;31:S9. 10.1007/s10654-016-0183-1
  124. Tieu L, Sarkar U, Schillinger D, Ralston JD, Ratanawongsa N, Pasick R, Lyles CR. Barriers and facilitators to online portal use among patients and caregivers in a safety net health care system: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e275. 10.2196/jmir.484726681155
  125. Lin J, Paganini S, Sander L, Lüking M, Ebert DD, Buhrman M, et al. An internet-based intervention for chronic pain. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2017;114:681–8. 10.3238/arztebl.2017.068129082858
  126. Ma J, Xiao L, Blonstein AC. Measurement of self-monitoring web technology acceptance and use in an e-health weight-loss trial. Telemed J E Health 2013;19:739–45. 10.1089/tmj.2013.000923952787
  127. Apter AJ, Localio AR, Morales KH, Han XY, Perez L, Mullen AN, et al. Home visits for uncontrolled asthma among low-income adults with patient portal access. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019;144:846–53. 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.05.03031181221
  128. Talboom-Kamp EP, Verdijk NA, Kasteleyn MJ, Harmans LM, Talboom IJ, Numans ME, Chavannes NH. High level of integration in integrated disease management leads to higher usage in the e-Vita Study: self-management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with web-based platforms in a parallel cohort design. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e185. 10.2196/jmir.703728566268
  129. Littlewood E, Duarte A, Hewitt C, Knowles S, Palmer S, Walker S, et al.; REEACT Team. A randomised controlled trial of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for the treatment of depression in primary care: the Randomised Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Acceptability of Computerised Therapy (REEACT) trial. Health Technol Assess 2015;19:viii, xxi–171. 10.3310/hta19101026685904
  130. van Beurden SB, Simmons SI, Tang JCH, Mewse AJ, Abraham C, Greaves CJ. Informing the development of online weight management interventions: a qualitative investigation of primary care patient perceptions. BMC Obes 2018;5:7. 10.1186/s40608-018-0184-629449953
  131. Mares ML, Gustafson DH, Glass JE, Quanbeck A, McDowell H, McTavish F, et al. Implementing an mHealth system for substance use disorders in primary care: a mixed methods study of clinicians’ initial expectations and first year experiences. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016;16:126. 10.1186/s12911-016-0365-527687632
  132. Lillevoll KR, Vangberg HCB, Griffiths KM, Waterloo K, Eisemann MR. Uptake and adherence of a self-directed internet-based mental health intervention with tailored e-mail reminders in senior high schools in Norway. BMC Psychiatry 2014;14:14. 10.1186/1471-244X-14-1424443820
  133. Zarski AC, Lehr D, Berking M, Riper H, Cuijpers P, Ebert DD. Adherence to internet-based mobile-supported stress management: a pooled analysis of individual participant data from three randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res 2016;18:e146. 10.2196/jmir.449327357528
  134. Lyles CR, Allen JY, Poole D, Tieu L, Kanter MH, Garrido T. ‘I want to keep the personal relationship with my doctor’: understanding barriers to portal use among African Americans and Latinos. J Med Internet Res 2016;18:e263. 10.2196/jmir.591027697748
  135. Castle-Clarke S. What Will New Technology Mean for the NHS and Its Patients?: Four Big Technological Trends. London: The Health Foundation, Nuffield Trust, Institute for Fiscal Studies and The King’s Fund; 2018. URL: www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2018-06/1530028974_the-nhs-at-70-what-will-new-technology-mean-for-the-nhs-and-its-patients.pdf (accessed 7 February 2023).
  136. Ancker JS, Grossman L, Benda NC. Health literacy 2030: is it time to redefine the term? J Gen Intern Med 2019;35:2427–30. 10.1007/s11606-019-05472-y31659662
  137. Cameron G, Alderwick H, Bowers A, Dixon J. Shaping Health Futures: Preparing for Tomorrow’s Possibilities Today. London: The Health Foundation; 2019. URL: www.health.org.uk/publications/reports/shaping-health-futures (accessed 18 January 2023).
  138. Ayre J, Bonner C, Bramwell S, McClelland S, Jayaballa R, Maberly G, McCaffery K. Implications for GP endorsement of a diabetes app with patients from culturally diverse backgrounds: a qualitative study. Austr J Prim Health 2020;26:52–7. 10.1071/PY19062
  139. Ozili PK. Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa Istanbul Rev 2018;18:329–40. 10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003
  140. Sprenger M, Mettler T, Osma J. Health professionals’ perspective on the promotion of e-mental health apps in the context of maternal depression. PLOS ONE 2017;12:e0180867. 10.1371/journal.pone.018086728704442
  141. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A’Court C, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e367. 10.2196/jmir.877529092808
  142. Miller KE, Kuhn E, Yu J, Owen JE, Jaworski BK, Taylor K, et al. Use and perceptions of mobile apps for patients among VA primary care mental and behavioral health providers. Profess Psychol: Res Pract 2019;50:204–9. 10.1037/pro0000229
  143. Careyva B, Shaak K, Mills G, Johnson M, Goodrich S, Stello B, Wallace LS. Implementation of technology-based patient engagement strategies within practice-based research networks. J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:581–91. 10.3122/jabfm.2016.05.16004427613791
  144. O’Cathain A, Drabble SJ, Foster A, Horspool K, Edwards L, Thomas C, Salisbury C. Being human: a qualitative interview study exploring why a telehealth intervention for management of chronic conditions had a modest effect. J Med Internet Res 2016;18:e163. 10.2196/jmir.587927363434
  145. Oliveira Hasiguchi TC. Bringing Health Care to the Patient: An Overview of the Use of Telemedicine in OECD Countries. OECD; 2020. URL: www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/8e56ede7-en.pdf?expires=1610648249&id=id&accname=ocid56013842&checksum=6D65D0CFC978F1B0B20F0B93CC57A9A5 (accessed 18 January 2023).
  146. Weppner WG, Ralston JD, Koepsell TD, Grothaus LC, Reid RJ, Jordan L, Larson EB. Use of a shared medical record with secure messaging by older patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010;33:2314–9. 10.2337/dc10-112420739686
  147. Maguire D, Evans H, Honeyman M, Omojomolo D. Digital Change in Health and Social Care. London: The King’s Fund; 2018. URL: www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/2018-06/Digital_change_health_care_Kings_Fund_June_2018.pdf (accessed 18 January 2023).
  148. Raza Khan U, Zia TA, Pearce C, Perera K. The MyHealthRecord system impacts on patient workflow in general practices. Stud Health Technol Inform 2019;266:162–7. 10.3233/shti19078931397318
  149. Rosen R. Delivering General Practice with Too Few GPs. London: Nuffield Trust; 2019. URL: www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/research/delivering-general-practice-with-too-few-gps (accessed 18 January 2023).
  150. Ricciardi L, Mostashari F, Murphy J, Daniel JG, Siminerio EP. A national action plan to support consumer engagement via e-health. Health Aff 2013;32:376–84. 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1216
  151. Moult A, Burroughs H, Kingstone T, Chew-Graham CA. How older adults self-manage distress: does the internet have a role? A qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2018;19:185. 10.1186/s12875-018-0874-730497414
  152. Amaro S, Duarte P. An integrative model of consumers’ intentions to purchase travel online. Tour Manag 2015;46:64–79. 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.06.006
  153. Bonsón Ponte E, Carvajal-Trujillo E, Escobar-Rodríguez T. Influence of trust and perceived value on the intention to purchase travel online: integrating the effects of assurance on trust antecedents. Tour Manag 2015;47:286–302. 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.009
  154. Hale K, Capra S, Bauer J. A framework to assist health professionals in recommending high-quality apps for supporting chronic disease self-management: illustrative assessment of type 2 diabetes apps. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2015;3:e87. 10.2196/mhealth.453226369346
  155. Lyles CR, Sarkar U, Ralston JD, Adler N, Schillinger D, Moffet HH, et al. Patient-provider communication and trust in relation to use of an online patient portal among diabetes patients: the Diabetes and Aging Study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:1128–31. 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-00156723676243
  156. NHS England. Five Year Forward View. London: NHS England; 2014. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/publication/nhs-five-year-forward-view/ (accessed 18 January 2023).
  157. Primary Care Strategy and NHS Contracts Group. 2019/20 General Medical Services (GMS) Contract: Guidance and Audit Requirements for GMS Contract [Version 1]. NHS England; 2019. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/19-20-gms-contract-guidance-audit-requirements-v2.pdf (accessed 18 January 2023).
  158. NHS Digital. GP and GP Practice Related Data 2020. URL: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/organisation-data-service/file-downloads/gp-and-gp-practice-related-data (accessed 18 January 2023).
  159. Karnoe A, Furstrand D, Christensen K, Norgaard O, Kayser L. Assessing competencies needed to engage with digital health services: development of the eHealth literacy assessment toolkit. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e178. 10.2196/jmir.834729748163
  160. Campbell J, Smith P, Nissen S, Bower P, Elliott M, Roland M. The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK: development and psychometric characteristics. BMC Fam Pract 2009;10:57. 10.1186/1471-2296-10-5719698140
  161. GP Patient Survey. GP Patient Survey: FAQ. URL: https://gp-patient.co.uk/faq (accessed 18 January 2023).
  162. GP Patient Survey. GP Patient Survey: See How Your GP Practice is Doing or Compare Practices. 2022. URL: www.gp-patient.co.uk/ (accessed 2022).
  163. Ipsos MORI. GP Patient Survey 2021: Technical Annex. 2021. URL: https://gp-patient.co.uk/downloads/2021/GPPS_2021_Technical_Annex_PUBLIC.pdf] (accessed 18 January 2023).
  164. Ipsos MORI. GP Patient Survey 2022: Technical Annex. 2022. URL: https://gp-patient.co.uk/downloads/2022/GPPS_2022_Technical_Annex_PUBLIC.pdf (accessed 18 January 2023).
  165. Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute. GP Patient Survey 2019: Technical Annex. Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute; 2019. URL: https://gp-patient.co.uk/downloads/archive/2019/GPPS_2019_Technical_Annex_PUBLIC.pdf (accessed 18 January 2023).
  166. Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute. GP Patient Survey 2020: Technical Annex. 2020. URL: https://gp-patient.co.uk/downloads/2020/GPPS_2020_Technical_Annex_PUBLIC.pdf (accessed 18 January 2023).
  167. Public Health England. Fingertips: Public Health Profiles. 2022. URL: https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/ (accessed 18 January 2023).
  168. Abel G, Elliott MN. Identifying and quantifying variation between healthcare organisations and geographical regions: using mixed-effects models. BMJ Qual Safe 2018;28:e009165. 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009165
  169. Bryce C, O’Connell MDL, Dale J, Underwood M, Atherton H. Online and telephone access to general practice: a cross-sectional patient survey. BJGP 2021;5:e0179. 10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0179
  170. Sinclair M, O’Toole J, Malawaraarachchi M, Leder K. Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:132. 10.1186/1471-2288-12-13222938205
  171. Peeters JM, Krijgsman JW, Brabers AE, Jong JDD, Friele RD. Use and uptake of eHealth in general practice: a cross-sectional survey and focus group study among health care users and general practitioners. JMIR Med Inform 2016;4:e11. 10.2196/medinform.451527052805
  172. Newbould J, Abel G, Ball S, Corbett J, Elliott M, Exley J, et al. Evaluation of telephone first approach to demand management in English general practice: observational study. BMJ 2017;258:j4197. 10.1136/bmj.j4197
  173. Gov.UK. COVID-19 Response: Living with COVID-19. 2022. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-response-living-with-covid-19/covid-19-response-living-with-covid-19 (accessed 11 January 2023).
  174. Reeves S, Kuper A, Hodges BD. Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography. BMJ 2008;337:a1020. 10.1136/bmj.a102018687725
  175. Atherton H, Brant H, Ziebland S, Bikker A, Campbell J, Gibson A, et al. The potential of alternatives to face-to-face consultation in general practice, and the impact on different patient groups: a mixed-methods case study. NIHR Health Serv Deliv Res 2018;6:1–200. 10.3310/hsdr06200
  176. Ford JA, Wong G, Jones AP, Steel N. Access to primary care for socioeconomically disadvantaged older people in rural areas: a realist review. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010652. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010652
  177. Public Health England Local Government Association. Health and Wellbeing in Rural Areas. Public Health England; 2017. URL: www.local.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/1.39_Health%20in%20rural%20areas_WEB.pdf (accessed 18 January 2023).
  178. Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 2019;11:589–97. 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  179. Ziebland S, McPherson A. Making sense of qualitative data analysis: an introduction with illustrations from DIPEx (personal experiences of health and illness). Med Educ 2006;40:405–14. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02467.x16635119
  180. O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. Br Med J 2010;341:c4587. 10.1136/bmj.c458720851841
  181. Gov.UK. Policy Paper: A Plan for Digital Health and Social Care. 2022. URL: www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-plan-for-digital-health-and-social-care/a-plan-for-digital-health-and-social-care (accessed 18 January 2023).
  182. NHS England. General Practice: Forward View. 2016. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gpfv.pdf (accessed 18 January 2023).
  183. NHS England. Standard General Medical Services Contract. November 2022. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/B1990i-standard-general-medical-services-contract-november-2022.pdf (accessed 18 January 2023).
  184. The Health Foundation. Projections: General Practice Workforce in England Summary of Findings. July 2022. URL: www.health.org.uk/publications/reports/projections-general-practice-workforce-in-england (accessed 18 January 2023).
  185. Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2021;374:n2061. 10.1136/bmj.n206134593508
  186. NHS England. Network Contract Directed Enhanced Service: Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme Guidance. 19 August 2019. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/publication/network-contract-directed-enhanced-service-additional-roles-reimbursement-scheme-guidance/ (accessed 21 May 2023).
  187. Rodriguez JA, Shachar C, Bates DW. Digital inclusion as health care: supporting health care equity with digital-infrastructure initiatives. N Engl J Med 2022;386:1101–3. 10.1056/NEJMp211564635302722
  188. NHS England. How to Access Your GP Practice [Video]. YouTube; 2020. URL: www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXHPWbEmp5s (accessed 18 January 2023).
  189. NHS.UK. NHS Account Help and Support. 2022. URL: www.nhs.uk/nhs-app/nhs-app-help-and-support/ (accessed 18 January 2023).
  190. NHS Digital. NHS App – View and Share Your NHS COVID Pass: Step by Step Instructions. April 2022. 2022. URL: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/nhs-app/nhs-app-guidance-for-gp-practices/tell-your-patients-about-the-nhs-app/view-and-share-your-nhs-covid-pass (accessed 11 January 2023).
  191. eConsult. How to Use eConsult. 2023. URL: https://econsult.net/nhs-patients/how-to-use-econsult (accessed 11 January 2023).
  192. NHS England. Next Steps for Integrating Primary Care: Fuller Stocktake Report 2022. 2022. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/next-steps-for-integrating-primary-care-fuller-stocktake-report.pdf (accessed 18 January 2023).
  193. Kong T, Scott MM, Li Y, Wichelman C. Physician attitudes towards-and adoption of-mobile health. Digit Health 2020;20:907187.10.1177/2055207620907187
  194. Hu X, Fang H, Wang P. Factors affecting doctor’s recommendation for mobile health services. Digital Health 2022;8:211259. 10.1177/20552076221125976
  195. NHS England. Investment and Evolution: A Five-Year Framework for GP Contract Reform to Implement the NHS Long Term Plan. 2019. URL: www.bma.org.uk/media/1461/bma-investment-and-evolution-five-year-framework-gp-contract-jan-2019.pdf (accessed 28 February 2023).
  196. Llan Healthcare. Changes to eConsult System. December 2022. URL: www.llanhealthcare.co.uk/changes-to-econsult-system/ (accessed 12 December 2022).
  197. The Doctors @ Dr Newman’s Surgery. A Note about Demand. 2021. URL: www.doctornewman.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/A-note-about-demand.pdf (accessed 25 November 2022).
  198. Meng D, Palen TE, Tsai J, McLeod M, Garrido T, Qian H. Association between secure patient–clinician email and clinical services utilisation in a US integrated health system: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ open 2015;5:e009557. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009557
  199. Kristiansen E, Atherton H, Austad B, Bergmo T, Norberg BL, Zanaboni P. Older patients’ experiences of access to and use of e-consultations with the general practitioner in Norway: an interview study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2022;41:33–42. 10.1080/02813432.2022.2161307
  200. Otte-Trojel T, de Bont A, Rundall TG, van de Klundert J. What do we know about developing patient portals? A systematic literature review. J Am Med Inf Assoc 2015;23:e162–8. 10.1093/jamia/ocv114
  201. Hammerton M, Benson T, Sibley A. Readiness for five digital technologies in general practice: perceptions of staff in one part of southern England. BMJ Open Qual 2022;11:e001865. 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001865
  202. Antonio MG, Petrovskaya O, Lau F. Is research on patient portals attuned to health equity? A scoping review. JAMIA 2019; 26:871–83. 10.1093/jamia/ocz05431066893
  203. UK Government. The Hewitt Review: An Independent Review of Integrated Care Systems. 4 April 2023. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1148568/the-hewitt-review.pdf (accessed 21 May 2023).
  204. Rughani G, Hanlon P, Corcoran N, Mair FS. The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland. Br J Gener Pract 2021;71:e391–8. 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0820
  205. Honeyman M, Evans H, Davies A. Digital Technology and Health Inequalities: A Scoping Review. Cardiff; 2020. URL: https://phw.nhs.wales/publications/publications1/digital-technology-and-health-inequalities-a-scoping-review/ (accessed 7 February 2023).
  206. Heponiemi T, Kaihlanen AM, Kouvonen A, Leemann L, Taipale S, Gluschkoff K. The role of age and digital competence on the use of online health and social care services: a cross-sectional population-based survey. Digit Health 2022;8:1074485. 10.1177/20552076221074485
  207. Richardson S, Lawrence K, Schoenthaler AM, Mann D. A framework for digital health equity. NPJ Digital Med 2022;5:119. 10.1038/s41746-022-00663-0
  208. Hobbs FDR, Bankhead C, Mukhtar T, Stevens S, Perera-Salazar R, Holt T, Salisbury C; National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research. Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14. Lancet 2016;387:2323–30. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00620-627059888
  209. Office of National Statistics. Ethnic Group, England and Wales: Census 2021. November 2022. URL: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/ethnicity/bulletins/ethnicgroupenglandandwales/census2021 (accessed 12 January 2023).
  210. Byczkowski TL, Munafo JK, Britto MT. Variation in use of Internet-based patient portals by parents of children with chronic disease. Archiv Pediatr Adoles Med 2011;165:405–11. 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.55
  211. Mafi JN, Mejilla R, Feldman H, Ngo L, Delbanco T, Darer J, et al. Patients learning to read their doctors’ notes: the importance of reminders. J Am Med Inform Assoc2016;23:951–5. 10.1093/jamia/ocv16726911830
  212. Masterson Creber RM, Grossman LV, Ryan B, Qian M, Polubriaginof FC, Restaino S, et al. Engaging hospitalized patients with personalized health information: a randomized trial of an inpatient portal. J Am Med Inf Assoc 2019;26:115–23. 10.1093/jamia/ocy146
  213. Chan B, Lyles C, Kaplan C, Lam R, Karliner L. A comparison of electronic patient-portal use among patients with resident and attending primary care providers. J Gen Intern Med 2018;33:2085–91. 10.1007/s11606-018-4637-x30187376
  214. Collins B. Technology and Innovation for Long-Term Health Conditions. London: The King’s Fund; 2020.
  215. Lyles CR, Sarkar U, Tieu L, Schillinger D, Handley MA, Gourley GI, et al. Searching for meaning in meaningful use in the safety net: an implementation case study of 5 community health centers in California. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31:S394.
  216. Cafazzo JA, Casselman M, Hamming N, Katzman DK, Palmert MR. Design of an mHealth app for the self-management of adolescent type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. J Med Internet Res 2012;14:e70. 10.2196/jmir.205822564332
  217. Ray JM, Kemp LL, Hubbard A, Cucciare MA. Developing a peer support protocol for improving veterans’ engagement to computer-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy. Behav Cogn Psychother 2017;45:253–65. 10.1017/S135246581600053928325175
  218. Richardson CR, Buis LR, Janney AW, Goodrich DE, Sen A, Hess ML, et al. An online community improves adherence in an internet-mediated walking program. Part 1: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2010;12:e71. 10.2196/jmir.133821169160
  219. Honeyman M, Dunn P, McKenna H. A Digital NHS? An Introduction to the Digital Agenda and Plans for Implementation. London: The King’s Fund; 2016. URL: www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/digital-nhs (accessed 19 January 2023).
  220. Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quart 2012;36:157–78. 10.2307/41410412
  221. Yamin CK, Emani S, Williams DH, Lipsitz SR, Karson AS, Wald JS, Bates DW. The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:568–74. 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.3421444847
← DiscussionAdditional information →

Attribution. Gary Abel; Helen Atherton; Jon Sussex; Nurunnahar Akter; Abodunrin Q Aminu; Wiktoria Bak et al. (2024). Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2024 Abel et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK607516. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support