EvidenceLib · Open textbook · CC BY 4.0
Evaluation of different models of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a mixed-methods realist evaluation
Freya Davies, Michelle Edwards, Delyth Price, Pippa Anderson, Andrew Carson-Stevens, Mazhar Choudhry, Matthew Cooke, Jeremy Dale, Liam Donaldson, Bridie Angela Evans, Barbara Harrington, Shaun Harris, Julie Hepburn, Peter Hibbert, Thomas Hughes, Faris Hussain, Saiful Islam, Rhys Pockett, Alison Porter, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena, Helen Snooks, Alan Watkins, Adrian Edwards, Alison Cooper · 11 sections in 11 chapters. Each section is its own page.
Introduction
Realist methodology
Phase 1
Phase 2 qualitative results
Routine data analysis to examine clinical effectiveness and cost consequences of different general practitioner–emergency department models
Investigating the economic impact of general practitioners in emergency departments: case study in an Inside–Parallel Emergency Department with selected (‘marker’) conditions that may be managed by emergency medicine or primary care colleagues
Mixed-methods analysis and overall programme theory
Discussion
References
Additional information
List of supplementary material
Attribution. Freya Davies; Michelle Edwards; Delyth Price; Pippa Anderson; Andrew Carson-Stevens; Mazhar Choudhry et al. (2024). Evaluation of different models of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a mixed-methods realist evaluation. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2024 Davies et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK603513. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.