Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Evaluation of the NHS England Low-Calorie Diet implementation pilot: a coproduced mixed-method study›Conclusions

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Evaluation of the NHS England Low-Calorie Diet implementation pilot: a coproduced mixed-method study · Conclusions

Conclusions

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 1 min read

Our mixed-methods evaluation, when combined with the findings from the NHS process and clinical data analyses, found that the NHS LCD programme (now NHS T2D Path to Remission) provides a clinically effective and cost-effective programme to support weight loss and glycaemic control in adults with T2D. However, the evaluation also identified some areas for improvement in referral equity, uptake and completion, and fidelity of delivery, which have already informed the development of the programme and the decision to roll out nationally. The findings provide one of the first and largest evaluations of this intervention approach and demonstrate that real-world implementation results can align with those from the underpinning trials, although the ability to monitor long-term impact is now critical.

All study publications are listed in Box 2.

← Research recommendationsReferences →

Attribution. Louisa J Ells; Tamara Brown; Jamie Matu; Ken Clare; Simon Rowlands; Maria Maynard et al. (2025). Evaluation of the NHS England Low-Calorie Diet implementation pilot: a coproduced mixed-method study. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2025 Ells et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK616722. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Conclusions

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support