Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Exploring the uptake and use of electronic cigarettes provided to smokers accessing homeless centres: a four-centre cluster feasibility trial›Objectives

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Exploring the uptake and use of electronic cigarettes provided to smokers accessing homeless centres: a four-centre cluster feasibility trial · Objectives

Objectives

CC BY 4.0 · NIHR Journals Library · approximately 2 min read

To test the feasibility of future trial work, seven objectives were set. Table 1 presents the study objectives and associated outcome measures and whether the objective is specific to the cluster level or across levels.

TABLE 1 Feasibility study objectives and outcome measures
ObjectiveOutcome measureMeasured at
1. Assess willingness of smokers to participate in the feasibility study to estimate recruitment rates and inform a future trialIn both arms, we will record the number of smokers asked to take part and the number of smokers who consentAcross arms
2. Assess participant retention in the intervention and control armsRecord (1) how many participants complete assessment measures in each arm at each time point, and (2) how many participants still have, and are still using, ECs in the intervention armsAcross arms
3. Examine the perceived value of the intervention, facilitators of and barriers to engagement, and influence of local contextQualitative interviews with 4-week completers and non-completers, quitters and smokers (n = 24, approximately six per site) between weeks 4 and 8 across both armsAcross arms
4. Assess service providers’ capacity to support the study and the type of information and training requiredQualitative interviews with keyworkers and front-line staff (n = 12, approximately three per site) across both armsAcross arms
5. Assess the potential efficacy of supplying free EC starter kitsMeasure breath CO levels, self-reported quit rates/cigarette consumption at each follow-up time pointAcross arms
6. Explore the feasibility of collecting data on contacts with health-care services among this population as an input to an economic evaluation in a full cRCTRecord participant utilisation of primary and secondary health-care services using a self-report service-use questionnaire at each time point and HRQoL using the EQ-5D-3LAcross arms
7. Estimate the cost of providing the intervention and UCRecord all resources used in the delivery, including staff costs, ECs and other costs incurred. Staff will complete a pro forma to record contact time, non-contact time and other resources used in deliveryAcross arms
← BackgroundMethods →

Attribution. Sharon Cox; Allison Ford; Jinshuo Li; Catherine Best; Allan Tyler; Deborah J Robson et al. (2021). Exploring the uptake and use of electronic cigarettes provided to smokers accessing homeless centres: a four-centre cluster feasibility trial. NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2021. This work was produced by Cox et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK570404. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Objectives

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support