Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Exploring voluntary sector specialist services for victim-survivors of sexual violence in England: the PROSPER co-production study›References

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Exploring voluntary sector specialist services for victim-survivors of sexual violence in England: the PROSPER co-production study · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 11 min read

  1. United Nations. Global Status Report on Violence Prevention. 2014. URL: www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241564793 (accessed 20 September 2022).
  2. World Health Organization. Human Reproduction Programme Annual Report 2021. Geneva: WHO; 2022.
  3. Stern V. A Report by Baroness Vivien Stern CBE of an Independent Review into How Rape Complaints are Handled by Public Authorities in England and Wales. London: Home Office; 2010.
  4. Capelas BE. Cost of Sexual Violence in Essex: An Analysis Using Administrative Data from Rape Crisis Services. Essex: Synergy; 2022.
  5. Robinson A, Hudson K, Brookman F. Multi-agency work on sexual violence: challenges and prospects identified from the implementation of a Sexual Assault Referral Centre (SARC). Howard J Crim Justice 2008;47:411–28. 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2008.00531.x
  6. Directory and Books Service. National Resource Directory. The ISSN Portal. 2021. URL: https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2055-1452 (accessed 20 September 2022).
  7. HM Government. Ending Violence Against Women and Girls. London: HM Government; 2016.
  8. HM Government. Cross Government Action Plan on Sexual Violence and Abuse. London: HM Government; 2006.
  9. HM Government. Tackling Violence Against Women and Girls. London: HM Government; 2021.
  10. NHS England. Public Health Functions to be Exercised by the NHS England: Service Specification No. 30, Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARCs). Leeds: NHSE; 2016.
  11. NHS England. Commissioning Framework for Adult and Paediatric Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARC) Services. Leeds: NHSE; 2015.
  12. NHS England. Strategic Direction for Sexual Assault and Abuse services – Lifelong Care for Victims and Survivors: 2018 – 2023. Leeds: NHSE; 2018.
  13. Home Office. Violence Against Women and Girls: National Statement of Expectations. 2022. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6244459dd3bf7f32a93d3b76/National_Statement_of_Expectations_2022_Final.pdf (accessed 7 May 2024).
  14. Home Office. Violence Against Women and Girls Services: Commissioning Toolkit. 2022. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/624445d6d3bf7f32b080fdba/VAWG_Commissioning_Toolkit_2022_Final.pdf (accessed 7 May 2024).
  15. Milbourne L. The Voluntary Sector in Transition. Bristol: Polity Press; 2013.
  16. Towers J, Walby S. Measuring the impact of cuts in public expenditure on the provision of services to prevent violence against women and girls. Safe Domest Abuse Q 2012;41:1–58. 10.1177/1558689822113540
  17. Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. Reports and Recommendations. 2022. URL: www.iicsa.org.uk/document/report-independent-inquiry-child-sexual-abuse-october-2022-0.html (accessed 7 May 2024).
  18. APPG. All-Party Parliamentary Group on Sexual Violence Report into the Funding and Commissioning of Sexual Violence and Abuse Services. Rape Crisis England & Wales; 2018.
  19. JiCSAV. Evidence Briefing 1: Independent Sexual Violence Advisors and Third Sector Support Services. 2021. URL: www.coventry.ac.uk/globalassets/media/global/08-new-research-section/csels/research-briefing3.pdf (accessed 16 November 2022).
  20. Rape Crisis. Holding it Together. 2022. URL: https://rcew.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/media/documents/RCEW_HoldingItTogether_Digital.pdf (accessed 16 November 2022).
  21. HM Government. Victim Funding Strategy. 2022. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1079518/victim-funding-strategy.pdf (accessed 16 November 2022).
  22. Healthcare Improvement Scotland. Healthcare and Forensic Medical Services for People Who Have Experienced Rape or Sexual Assault: Indicators. 2020. URL: www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/standards_and_guidelines/stnds/sexual_assault_indicators.aspx (accessed 20 September 2022).
  23. NHS Education for Scotland. Transforming Psychological Trauma. 2017. URL: https://transformingpsychologicaltrauma.scot/media/x54hw43l/nationaltraumatrainingframework.pdf (accessed 20 September 2022).
  24. Scottish Government. Equally Safe: Delivery Plan. 2017. URL: www.gov.scot/publications/equally-safe-delivery-plan-scotlands-strategy-prevent-violence-against-women/ (accessed 20 September 2022).
  25. Scottish Government. Rape and Sexual Assault‎ Victims Taskforce: High Level Work Plan. 2017. URL: www.gov.scot/publications/rape-and-sexual-assault-victims-taskforce-high-level-work-plan/ (accessed 20 September 2022).
  26. Scottish Government. National Scoping Exercise of Advocacy Services for Victims of Violence Against Women and Girls. 2017. URL: www.gov.scot/publications/national-scoping-exercise-advocacy-services-victims-violence-against-women-girls/ (accessed 20 September 2022).
  27. Walker IF, Leigh-Hunt N, Lee ACK. Redesign and commissioning of sexual health services in England: a qualitative study. Public Health 2016;139:134–40. 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.05.01827372230
  28. Ward C, Whitfield D, Piggott SA. Supporting victims of sexual violence: whose responsibility? J Integr Care 2013;21:238–47. 10.1108/JICA-06-2013-0021
  29. Simmonds L. The impact of local commissioning on victim services in England and Wales: an empirical study. Int Rev Victimol 2019;25:181–99. 10.1177/0269758018787938
  30. Lovett, J. Synergy: Essex Partnership Rape Crisis of Centres: Evaluation of the First Contact Navigators Project. London: Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, London Metropolitan University; 2019.
  31. Smith, O. End of Year 1 Project Evaluation: Talking Therapies. Cambridge: Anglia Ruskin University; n.d.
  32. NHS England. Securing Excellence in Commissioning Sexual Assault Services for People Who Experience Sexual Violence. Leeds: NHSE; 2013.
  33. Smith N, Dogaru C, Ellis, F. Hear Me. Believe Me. Respect Me. A Survey of Adult Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse and Their Experience of Support Services. Technical Report. Ipswich: University of Suffolk; 2015.
  34. Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual abuse. Consultation on the Impacts of CSA and Experiences of Support Services. 2018. URL: www.iicsa.org.uk/document/consultation-impacts-csa-and-experiences-support-services (accessed 20 September 2022).
  35. Gekoski A, McSweeney T, Broome S, Adler R, Jenkins S, Georgiou D. Support Services for Victims and Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse. Crown; 2022. URL: www.iicsa.org.uk/publications/research/support-services-victims-survivors-csa (accessed 8 May 2024).
  36. Robinson A, Hudson K. Different yet complementary: two approaches to supporting victims of sexual violence in the UK. Criminol Crim Justice 2011;11:515–33.
  37. Henderson S. The Pros and Cons of Providing Dedicated Sexual Violence Services: A Literature Review. Glasgow: Rape Crisis Scotland; 2012.
  38. Hester M, Lilley SJ. More than support to court: rape victims and specialist sexual violence services. Int Rev Vict 2018;24:313–28.30111902
  39. Bows H. Practitioner views on the impacts, challenges, and barriers in supporting older survivors of sexual violence. Violence Against Women 2018;24:1070–90. 10.1177/107780121773234829332552
  40. Javaid A. The invisible, the alien and the marginal: social and cultural constructions of male rape in voluntary agencies. Int Rev Vict 2019;25:107–23. 10.1177/0269758017745614
  41. Lowe M. Male sexual assault survivors: lessons for UK services. J Aggress Confl Peace Res 2017;10:181–8. 10.1108/JACPR-07-2017-0308
  42. Brooker C, Durmaz E. Mental health, sexual violence and the work of Sexual Assault Referral Centres (SARCs) in England. J Forensic Leg Med 2015;31:47–51. 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.01.00625735784
  43. Parcesepe AM, Martin SL, Pollock MD, García-Moreno C. The effectiveness of mental health interventions for adult female survivors of sexual assault: a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav 2015;25:15–25. 10.1016/j.avb.2015.06.004
  44. Dhairyawan R, Shardlow K, Carroll M, Sacks R. A national survey of facilities for complainants of sexual assault. Int J STD AIDS 2017;28:512–9. 10.1177/095646241665841327402337
  45. Westmarland N, Alderson S. The health, mental health, and well-being benefits of rape crisis counseling. J Interpers Violence 2013;28:3265–82. 10.1177/088626051349689923926218
  46. Peters SM. Medical neoliberalism in Rape Crisis Center counseling: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of clinicians’ understandings of survivor distress. J Soc Issues 2019;75:238–66. 10.1111/josi.12316
  47. Taylor AK, Gregory A, Feder G, Williamson E. ‘We’re all wounded healers’: a qualitative study to explore the well-being and needs of helpline workers supporting survivors of domestic violence and abuse. Health Soc Care Community 2019;27:856–62. 10.1111/hsc.1269930592098
  48. Rees J. Public sector commissioning and the third sector: old wine in new bottles? Public Policy Adm 2014;29:45–63. 10.1177/0952076713510345
  49. Carmel E, Harlock J. Instituting the ‘third sector’ as a governable terrain: partnership, procurement and performance in the UK. Policy Polit 2008;36:155–71. 10.1332/030557308783995017
  50. Billis D, Glennerster H. Human services and the voluntary sector: towards a theory of comparative advantage. J Soc Policy 1998;27:79–98.
  51. Paine AE, Hill M. The Engagement of Volunteers in Third Sector Organisations Delivering Public Services. In Rees J, Mullins D, editors. The Third Sector Delivering Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press; 2016. pp. 127–48.
  52. Macmillan R. Making Sense of the Big Society: Perspectives from the Third Sector. The British Library; 2022. URL: http://scie-socialcareonline.org.uk (accessed 20 September 2022).
  53. Salamon LM. Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: toward a theory of government non-profit relations in the modern welfare state. J Volunt Action Res 1987;16:29–49. 10.1177/089976408701600104
  54. Miller R, Rees J. Mental health commissioning: master or subject of change? Ment Health Rev J 2014;19:145–55. 10.1108/MHRJ-04-2014-0013
  55. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. SAMHSA’s Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2019. URL: http://hhs.gov (accessed 24 January 2014).
  56. Sperlich M, Seng J, Rowe H, Fisher J, Cuthbert C, Taylor J. A cycles-breaking framework to disrupt intergenerational patterns of maltreatment and vulnerability during the childbearing year. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2017;46:378–89. 10.1016/j.jogn.2016.11.017
  57. Walby S, Olive P, Towers J, Francis B, Strid S, Krizsan A, et al. Overview of the Worldwide Best Practices for Rape Prevention and for Assisting Women Victims of Rape. Brussels: Directorate General for Internal Policies (European Parliament); 2013.
  58. Sweeney A, Clement S, Filson B, Kennedy A. Trauma-informed mental healthcare in the UK: what is it and how can we further its development? MHRJ 2016;21:174–92. 10.1108/MHRJ-01-2015-0006
  59. Office for National Statistics. Crime in England and Wales: Year Ending March 2018. London: HM Government; 2018.
  60. Office for National Statistics. Sexual Offences in England and Wales: Office for National Statistics. 2018. URL: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/sexualoffencesinenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2017 (accessed 20 September 2022).
  61. ICF International. Adult SARC Health Needs Assessment: North Midlands. 2016.
  62. Weld S. Sexual Assault Referral Centres in the South West. 2014. URL: http://gloucestershire.gov.uk (accessed 24 January 2024).
  63. Mason F, Lodrick Z. Psychological consequences of sexual assault. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013;27:27–37. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.08.01523182852
  64. Brooker C, Tocque K, Paul S. Assessment of the mental health status of a one year cohort attending a two Sexual Assault Referral Centres in England. J Forensic Leg Med 2018;54:44–9. 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.12.01829310018
  65. Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V, et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med 2019;56:774–86. 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.00131104722
  66. Loya RM. Rape as an economic crime: the impact of sexual violence on survivors’ employment and economic well-being. J Interpers Violence 2015;30:2793–813. 10.1177/088626051455429125381269
  67. Creswell JW, Plano-Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018.
  68. Yin RK. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018.
  69. Ridder HG. The theory contribution of case study research designs. Bus Res 2017;10:281–305. 10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z
  70. Yazan B. Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. TQR 2015;20:134–52. 10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102
  71. Stake RE. Qualitative Case Studies. In Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2005. pp. 443–66.
  72. Bradbury-Jones C, Damery S, Fruin K, Gunby C, Harlock J, Hebberts L, et al. The scope, range and use of voluntary sector specialist sexual violence services in England: findings and recommendations from a national study. Health Social Care Community 2025:9368961. 10.1155/hsc/9368961
  73. Bradbury-Jones C, Herber OR, Miller R, Taylor J. Improving the visibility and description of theory in qualitative research: the QUANTUM typology. SSM Qual Res Health 2022;2:100030. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321521000305 (accessed 7 May 2024).36531299
  74. Fisher P, Balfour B, Moss S. Advocating co-productive engagement with marginalised people: a specific perspective on and by survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Br J Soc Work 2018;48:2096–113. 10.1093/bjsw/bcx149
  75. Sweeney A, Beresford P, Faulkner A, Nettle M, Rose D. This is Survivor Research. Chepstow: PCCS Books; 2009.
  76. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Going the Extra Mile: Improving the Nation’s Health and Wellbeing Through Public Involvement in Research. 2015. URL: http://nihr.ac.uk (accessed 24 January 2024).
  77. Hickey G, Brearley S, Coldham T, Denegri S, Green G, Staniszewska S, et al. Guidance on Co-producing a Research Project. Southampton: INVOLVE; 2018.
  78. Perôt C, Chevous J. Turning Pain into Power: A Charter for Engaging Survivors in Projects, Research and Service Development. London: Survivors Voices; 2018.
  79. Turner B. User Controlled Research: Its Meaning and Potential. INVOLVE; 2005. URL: www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Easyreadusercontrolled150806.pdf (accessed 8 May 2024).
  80. Chevous J, Bewley S, Kennedy S, Perôt C. Survivors’ Voices: Survivor Involvement in Research Ladder (Pilot Draft 2). 2022. URL: https://survivorsvoices.org/involvement-ladder/ (accessed 12 September 2022).
  81. Kennedy S, Bewley S, Chevous J, Perôt C, Vigneri M, Bacchus LJ. A systematic review that evaluates the extent and quality of involving childhood abuse survivors in shaping, conducting and disseminating research in the UK. Res All 2018;6:1–25. 10.14324/RFA.06.1.03
  82. Lambert N, Carr S. ‘Outside the original remit’: co-production in UK mental health research, lessons from the field. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2018;27:1273–81. 10.1111/inm.1249929920906
  83. Bradbury-Jones, C. Children as Co-researchers: The Need for Protection. London: Dunedin; 2014.
  84. Oliver K, Kothari A, Mays N. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Res Policy Syst 2019;17:33. 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-330922339
  85. Bell DM, Pahl K. Co-production: towards a Utopian approach. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2017;21:105–17. 10.1080/13645579.2017.1348581
  86. McNiff S. Art Heals: How Creativity Cures the Soul. Boulder, CO: Shambhala Publications; 2004.
  87. Bolwerk A, Mack-Andrick J, Lang FR, Dörfler A, Maihöfner C. How art changes your brain: differential effects of visual art production and cognitive art evaluation on functional brain connectivity. PLOS ONE 2014;9:e0101035. 10.1371/journal.pone.0101035
  88. Gauly J, Ulahannan A, Grove AL. The extended Pillar Integration Process (ePIP): a data integration method allowing the systematic synthesis of findings from three different sources. J Mix Methods Res 2022;18:31–47 10.1177/15586898221135409
  89. Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs – principles and practices. Health Serv Res 2013;48:2134–56. 10.1111/1475-6773.1211724279835
  90. Proudfoot K. Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. J Mix Methods Res 2022;17:308–26. 10.1177/15586898221126816
  91. Bronfenbrenner, U. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.
  92. Pemberton JV, Loeb TB. Impact of sexual and interpersonal violence and trauma on women: trauma-informed practice and feminist theory. J Fem Fam Ther 2020;32:115–31. 10.1080/08952833.2020.179356439583046
  93. Kulkarni S. Intersectional trauma-informed intimate partner violence (IPV) services: narrowing the gap between IPV service delivery and survivor needs. J Fam Violence 2019;34:55–64. 10.1007/s10896-018-0001-5
  94. Tricco AC, Zarin W, Rios P, Nincic V, Khan PA, Ghassemi M, et al. Engaging policy-makers, health system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: a scoping. Implement Sci 2018;13:31. 10.1186/s13012-018-0717-x29433543
  95. Langlois EV, Becerril Montekio V, Young T, Song K, Alcalde-Rabanal J, Tran N. Enhancing evidence informed policymaking in complex health systems: lessons from multi-site collaborative approaches. Health Res Policy Syst 2016;14:1–11.26742486
  96. Health Research Authority. GDPR Guidance for Researchers and Study Coordinators. 2018. URL: www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/policies-standards-legislation/data-protection-and-information-governance/gdpr-guidance/ (accessed 1 September 2022).
  97. HM Government. Data Protection Act. 2018. URL: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/pdfs/ukpga_20180012_en.pdf (accessed 1 September 2022).
  98. Maine C. Feminist-Narrative Therapy, Treating PTSD and Substance Abuse in Women. Doctoral dissertation. San Francisco Bay, CA: Alliant International University; 2004.
  99. Rederstorff JC, Levendosky AA. Clinical applications of feminist identity development: an illustrative case study. Clin Case Stud 2007;6:119–30.
  100. Arutyunova A. Why We Need a Feminist Funding Ecosystem. 2018. URL: www.awid.org/news-and-analysis/why-we-need-feminist-funding-ecosystem (accessed 1 October 2022).
  101. Women’s Resource Centre. Why Doesn’t Commissioning Work for the Women’s Sector? 2023. URL: www.wrc.org.uk/blog/why-doesnt-commissioning-work-for-the-womens-sector (accessed 1 October 2022).
  102. Scottish Government. NHS Scotland Trauma-Informed Practice: Toolkit. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2021.
  103. Horvath MA, Rose H, Dalton T, Massey K, Crivatu I, Matthews K. Independent Sexual Violence Advisers (ISVAs) in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: A Study of Impacts, Effects, Coping Mechanisms and Effective Support Systems for People Working as ISVAs and ISVA Managers. 2021. URL: http://limeculture.co.uk (accessed 24 January 2024).
  104. Brooks-Hay O, Burman M, Bradley L, Kyle D. Evaluation of the Rape Crisis Scotland National Advocacy Project Final Report. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; n.d.
  105. Jumarali SN, Nnawulezi N, Royson S, Lippy C, Rivera AN, Toopet T. Participatory research engagement of vulnerable populations: employing survivor-centered, trauma-informed approaches. J Particip Res Methods 2021;2:e24414. 10.35844/001c.24414
  106. National Institute for Health and Care Research. PPI (Patient and Public Involvement) Resources for Applicants to NIHR Research Programmes. 2019. URL: www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/ppi-patient-and-public-involvement-resources-for-applicants-to-nihr-research-programmes/23437 (accessed 1 August 2022).
  107. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Payment Guidance for Researchers and Professionals. 2022. URL: www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/payment-guidance-for-researchers-and-professionals/27392#payment-rates (accessed 1 September 2022).
  108. McCosker H, Barnard A, Gerber R. Undertaking sensitive research: issues and strategies for meeting the safety needs of all participants. Forum Qual Soc Res 2001;2. 10.17169/fqs-2.1.983
  109. Drauker CB, Martsolf DS, Poole C. Developing distress protocols for research on sensitive topics. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2009;23:342–50. 10.1016/j.apnu.2008.10.008
  110. Taylor J, Bradbury-Jones C, Breckenridge J, Jones C, Herber OR. Risk of vicarious trauma in nursing research: a focused mapping review and synthesis. J Clin Nurs 2016;25:2768–77. 10.1111/jocn.1323527161657
← Discussion, conclusion and recommendationsAdditional information →

Attribution. Caroline Bradbury-Jones; Sarah Damery; Kirsten Fruin; Clare Gunby; Jenny Harlock; Lucy Hebberts et al. (2025). Exploring voluntary sector specialist services for victim-survivors of sexual violence in England: the PROSPER co-production study. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2025 Bradbury-Jones et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK613641. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support