Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Improving care for older people with long-term conditions and social care needs in Salford: the CLASSIC mixed-methods study, including RCT

EvidenceLib · Open textbook · CC BY 4.0

Improving care for older people with long-term conditions and social care needs in Salford: the CLASSIC mixed-methods study, including RCT

Peter Bower, David Reeves, Matt Sutton, Karina Lovell, Amy Blakemore, Mark Hann, Kelly Howells, Rachel Meacock, Luke Munford, Maria Panagioti, Beth Parkinson, Lisa Riste, Mark Sidaway, Yiu-Shing Lau, Lynsey Warwick-Giles, John Ainsworth, Thomas Blakeman, Ruth Boaden, Iain Buchan, Stephen Campbell, Peter Coventry, Siobhan Reilly, Caroline Sanders, Suzanne Skevington, Waquas Waheed, Katherine Checkland · 16 sections in 16 chapters. Each section is its own page.

Long-term conditions and integrated care

  • Long-term conditions and integrated care

Salford Integrated Care Programme: an overview

  • Salford Integrated Care Programme: an overview

CLASSIC evaluation methods: an overview

  • CLASSIC evaluation methods: an overview

Methods of the CLASSIC cohort

  • Methods of the CLASSIC cohort

Methods of implementation 1

  • Methods of implementation 1

Methods of implementation 2

  • Methods of implementation 2

Methods of outcomes 1

  • Methods of outcomes 1

Methods of outcomes 2

  • Methods of outcomes 2

Results of the CLASSIC cohort

  • Results of the CLASSIC cohort

Results of implementation 1

  • Results of implementation 1

Results of implementation 2

  • Results of implementation 2

Results of outcome 1

  • Results of outcome 1

Outcome 2 (health coaching randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis)

  • Outcome 2 (health coaching randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis)

Discussion

  • Discussion

References

  • References

Acknowledgements

  • Acknowledgements

Attribution. Peter Bower; David Reeves; Matt Sutton; Karina Lovell; Amy Blakemore; Mark Hann et al. (2018). Improving care for older people with long-term conditions and social care needs in Salford: the CLASSIC mixed-methods study, including RCT. NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2018. This work was produced by Bower et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK519984. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

About this book

Publisher
NIHR Journals Library
Licence
CC BY 4.0
Sections
16
Year
2018
Words
60,374
Retrieved
2026-11-04

Source record on NCBI Bookshelf ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support