Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Increasing uptake of self-management education programmes for type 2 diabetes in primary care: the Embedding research programme including an RCT›References

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Increasing uptake of self-management education programmes for type 2 diabetes in primary care: the Embedding research programme including an RCT · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 10 min read

  1. van den Arend IJ, Stolk RP, Krans HM, Grobbee DE, Schrijvers AJ. Management of type 2 diabetes: a challenge for patient and physician. Patient Educ Couns 2000;40:187–94. 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00067-110771372
  2. Davies MJ, Heller S, Skinner TC, Campbell MJ, Carey ME, Cradock S, et al.; Diabetes Education and Self Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed Collaborative. Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;336:491–5. 10.1136/bmj.39474.922025.BE18276664
  3. Deakin TA, Cade JE, Williams R, Greenwood DC. Structured patient education: the diabetes X-PERT Programme makes a difference. Diabet Med 2006;23:944–54. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01906.x16922700
  4. Jacobs-van der Bruggen MA, van Baal PH, Hoogenveen RT, Feenstra TL, Briggs AH, Lawson K, et al. Cost-effectiveness of lifestyle modification in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1453–8. 10.2337/dc09-036319435958
  5. Khunti K, Gray LJ, Skinner T, Carey ME, Realf K, Dallosso H, et al. Effectiveness of a diabetes education and self management programme (DESMOND) for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: three year follow-up of a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. BMJ 2012;344:e2333. 10.1136/bmj.e233322539172
  6. Trento M, Gamba S, Gentile L, Grassi G, Miselli V, Morone G, et al.; ROMEO Investigators. Rethink Organization to iMprove Education and Outcomes (ROMEO): a multicenter randomized trial of lifestyle intervention by group care to manage type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010;33:745–7. 10.2337/dc09-202420103547
  7. Gillett M, Dallosso HM, Dixon S, Brennan A, Carey ME, Campbell MJ, et al. Delivering the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2010;341:c4093. 10.1136/bmj.c409320729270
  8. Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2018;41:2669–701. 10.2337/dci18-003330291106
  9. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Type 2 Diabetes in Adults: Management. NICE Guideline NG28. London: NICE; 2022. URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28 (accessed 4 May 2023).
  10. Department of Health and Diabetes UK. Structured Patient Education in Diabetes: Report from the Patient Education Working Group. London: Department of Health; 2005.
  11. Sturt AS, Dokubo EK, Sint TT. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) for treating HIV infection in ART-eligible pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;2010:CD008440. 10.1002/14651858.cd008440
  12. NHS Employers, General Practitioners Committee (British Medical Association), NHS England. 2014/2015 General Medical Services (GMS) Contract Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF): Guidance for GMS Contract 2014/15. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/gp/investment/gp-contract/2014-2015 (accessed 4 May 2023).
  13. NHS Digital. National Diabetes Audit, 2020–21 Quarterly Report. URL: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/national-diabetes-audit/e4-data (accessed 4 May 2023).
  14. Nicolucci A, Kovacs Burns K, Holt RI, Comaschi M, Hermanns N, Ishii H, et al.; DAWN2 Study Group. Diabetes attitudes, wishes and needs second study (DAWN2™): cross-national benchmarking of diabetes-related psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes. Diabet Med 2013;30:767–77. 10.1111/dme.1224523711019
  15. Funnell MM, Bootle S, Stuckey HL. The diabetes attitudes, wishes and needs second study. Clin Diabetes 2015;33:32–6. 10.2337/diaclin.33.1.3225653471
  16. Martin GP, Weaver S, Currie G, Finn R, McDonald R. Innovation sustainability in challenging health-care contexts: embedding clinically led change in routine practice. Health Serv Manage Res 2012;25:190–9. 10.1177/095148481247424623554445
  17. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions. URL: https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/complex-interventions-guidance (accessed 20 December 2021).
  18. Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update. Health Technol Assess 2021;25:1–132. 10.3310/hta25570
  19. Turner J, Martin G, Hudson N, Shaw L, Huddlestone L, Weis C, et al. Using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to develop an intervention to improve referral and uptake rates for self-management education for patients with type 2 diabetes in UK primary care. BMC Health Serv Res 2022;22:1206. 10.1186/s12913-022-08553-736167564
  20. Huddlestone L, Turner J, Eborall H, Hudson N, Davies M, Martin G. Application of normalisation process theory in understanding implementation processes in primary care settings in the UK: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract 2020;21:52. 10.1186/s12875-020-01107-y32178624
  21. May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology 2009;43:535–54.
  22. May C. Towards a general theory of implementation. Implement Sci 2013;8:18. 10.1186/1748-5908-8-1823406398
  23. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;4:50. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-5019664226
  24. Davies M, Kristunas CA, Huddlestone L, Alshreef A, Bodicoat D, Dixon S, et al. Increasing uptake of structured self-management education programmes for type 2 diabetes in a primary care setting: a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2020;6:71. 10.1186/s40814-020-00606-032477589
  25. Davies MJ, Kristunas CA, Alshreef A, Dixon S, Eborall H, Glab A, et al. The impact of an intervention to increase uptake to structured self-management education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care (the embedding package), compared to usual care, on glycaemic control: study protocol for a mixed methods study incorporating a wait-list cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract 2019;20:152. 10.1186/s12875-019-1038-031699046
  26. Davies MJ, Bodicoat DH, Brennan A, Dixon S, Eborall H, Glab A, et al. Uptake of self-management education programmes for people with type 2 diabetes in primary care through the embedding package: a cluster randomised control trial and ethnographic study. BMC Prim Care 2024;25:136. 10.1186/s12875-024-02372-x38664727
  27. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1577–89. 10.1056/NEJMoa080647018784090
  28. May C. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:86. 10.1186/1472-6963-6-8616827928
  29. Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med 2010;8:63. 10.1186/1741-7015-8-6320961442
  30. Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 2019;11:589–97. 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  31. Harvey G, Kitson A. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci 2016;11:33. 10.1186/s13012-016-0398-227013464
  32. Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2020. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent; 2020. 10.22024/UniKent/01.02.84818
  33. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013. NICE Process and Methods PMG9. London: NICE; 2013. URL: www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/chapter/foreword (accessed 9 April 2019).
  34. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Health Technology Evaluation. Process, Methods and Topic Selection Review: Conclusions and Final Review (Item 7). Public board meeting agenda and papers: 19 January 2022.
  35. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The NICE Methods of Health Technology Evaluation: The Case for Change. London: NICE; 2020.
  36. Gæde P, Oellgaard J, Carstensen B, Rossing P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Years of life gained by multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: 21 years follow-up on the Steno-2 randomised trial. Diabetologia 2016;59:2298–307. 10.1007/s00125-016-4065-627531506
  37. Hatswell AJ, Bullement A, Briggs A, Paulden M, Stevenson MD. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis in cost-effectiveness models: determining model convergence in cohort models. PharmacoEconomics 2018;36:1421–6. 10.1007/s40273-018-0697-330051268
  38. Pollard D, Pidd K, Breeze P, Brennan A, Thomas C. Sheffield Type 2 Diabetes Treatment Model Version 3: With the Embedding RCT Health Economic Analyses Implemented. Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield; 2023.
  39. Quinn LM, Woolley AK, Davies MJ, Bodicoat DH, Seidu S, Khunti K, Hadjiconstantinou M. Educational preferences in individuals with cardiometabolic disease differs with age, ethnicity and educational status. Patient Educ Couns 2022;105:3479–86. 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.01636150978
  40. Health Innovation Network. Structured Education for Type 2 Diabetes: A Toolkit for Optimal Delivery. London: Health Innovation Network; 2014. URL: https://healthinnovationnetwork.com/resources/type-2-diabetes-a-toolkit-for-optimal-delivery-of-structured-education (accessed 25 April 2023).
  41. Diabetes UK. Taking Control HCP Toolkit. URL: https://shop.diabetes.org.uk/products/taking-control-hcp-toolkit (accessed 25 April 2023).
  42. Goff LM. Ethnicity and Type 2 diabetes in the UK. Diabet Med 2019;36:927–38. 10.1111/dme.1389530614072
  43. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
  44. Pollard DJ, Keetharuth A, Brennan A, Bodicoat DH, Glab A, Hadjiconstantinou M, et al. A model based cost-utility analysis of Embedding referral to structured self-management education into standard practice (Embedding) compared to usual care for people with type 2 diabetes diagnosis in the last 12 months in England. BMJ Open 2025;15:e093327. 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093327
  45. Beaudet A, Clegg J, Thuresson PO, Lloyd A, McEwan P. Review of utility values for economic modeling in type 2 diabetes. Value Health 2014;17:462–70. 10.1016/j.jval.2014.03.00324969008
  46. Alva ML, Gray A, Mihaylova B, Leal J, Holman RR. The impact of diabetes-related complications on healthcare costs: new results from the UKPDS (UKPDS 84). Diabet Med 2015;32:459–66. 10.1111/dme.1264725439048
  47. Breeze P, Thomas C, Thokala P, Lafortune L, Brayne C, Brennan A. The impact of including costs and outcomes of dementia in a health economic model to evaluate lifestyle interventions to prevent diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Med Decis Making 2020;40:912–23. 10.1177/0272989X2094675832951510
  48. Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2017. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit; 2017.
  49. Joint Formulary Committee. BNF Online. https://bnf.nice.org.uk (accessed 1 June 2021).
  50. Tappenden P, Eggington S, Nixon R, Chilcott J, Sakai H, Karnon J. Colorectal Cancer Screening Options Appraisal: Report to the English Bowel Cancer Screening Working Group. Sheffield: School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield; 2004.
  51. Chalder M, Wiles NJ, Campbell J, Hollinghurst SP, Searle A, Haase AM, et al. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a physical activity intervention as a treatment for depression: the treating depression with physical activity (TREAD) trial. Health Technol Assess 2012;16:1–164, iii–iv. 10.3310/hta16100
  52. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Chronic Kidney Disease (Stage 5). Peritoneal Dialysis. Clinical Guideline CG125 . London: NICE; 2011.
  53. Gordois A, Scuffham P, Shearer A, Oglesby A, Tobian JA. The health care costs of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the US. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1790–5. 10.2337/diacare.26.6.179012766111
  54. Madan J, Rawdin A, Stevenson M, Tappenden P. A rapid-response economic evaluation of the UK NHS Cancer Reform Strategy breast cancer screening program extension via a plausible bounds approach. Value Health 2010;13:215–21. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00667.x19878494
  55. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension in Adults: Diagnosis and Management. Clinical Guideline CG127 . London: NICE; 2011.
  56. Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2020. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit; 2020. 10.22024/UniKent/01.02.84818
  57. Curtis L. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2011. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit; 2011.
  58. Winkley K, Upsher R, Stahl D, Pollard D, Kasera A, Brennan A, et al. Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2020;24:1–232. 10.3310/hta24280
  59. Leal J, Alva M, Gregory V, Hayes A, Mihaylova B, Gray AM, et al. Estimating risk factor progression equations for the UKPDS Outcomes Model 2 (UKPDS 90). Diabet Med 2021;38:e14656. 10.1111/dme.1465634297424
  60. Sargeant JA, Brady EM, Zaccardi F, Tippins F, Webb DR, Aroda VR, et al. Adults with early-onset type 2 diabetes (aged 18–39 years) are severely underrepresented in diabetes clinical research trials. Diabetologia 2020;63:1516–20. 10.1007/s00125-020-05174-932483683
  61. Sone H, Katagiri A, Ishibashi S, Abe R, Saito Y, Murase T, et al.; JD Study Group. Effects of lifestyle modifications on patients with type 2 diabetes: the Japan Diabetes Complications Study (JDCS) study design, baseline analysis and three year-interim report. Horm Metab Res 2002;34:509–15. 10.1055/s-2002-3479112384828
  62. Young RJ, Taylor J, Friede T, Hollis S, Mason JM, Lee P, et al. Pro-active call center treatment support (PACCTS) to improve glucose control in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2005;28:278–82. 10.2337/diacare.28.2.27815677779
  63. Adolfsson ET, Walker-Engström ML, Smide B, Wikblad K. Patient education in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled 1-year follow-up study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007;76:341–50. 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.09.01817069923
  64. Ko SH, Song KH, Kim SR, Lee JM, Kim JS, Shin JH, et al. Long-term effects of a structured intensive diabetes education programme (SIDEP) in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus – a 4-year follow-up study. Diabet Med 2007;24:55–62. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02013.x17227325
  65. Sturt JA, Whitlock S, Fox C, Hearnshaw H, Farmer AJ, Wakelin M, et al. Effects of the diabetes manual 1:1 structured education in primary care. Diabet Med 2008;25:722–31. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02451.x18435777
  66. Gary TL, Batts-Turner M, Yeh HC, Hill-Briggs F, Bone LR, Wang NY, et al. The effects of a nurse case manager and a community health worker team on diabetic control, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations among urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1788–94. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.33819858437
  67. Walker EA, Shmukler C, Ullman R, Blanco E, Scollan-Koliopoulus M, Cohen HW. Results of a successful telephonic intervention to improve diabetes control in urban adults: a randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2011;34:2–7. 10.2337/dc10-100521193619
  68. Ali MK, Singh K, Kondal D, Devarajan R, Patel SA, Shivashankar R, et al.; CARRS Trial Group. Effectiveness of a multicomponent quality improvement strategy to improve achievement of diabetes care goals: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:399–408. 10.7326/M15-280727398874
  69. Odnoletkova I, Goderis G, Nobels F, Fieuws S, Aertgeerts B, Annemans L, Ramaekers D. Optimizing diabetes control in people with Type 2 diabetes through nurse-led telecoaching. Diabet Med 2016;33:777–85. 10.1111/dme.1309226872105
  70. Andrews RC, Cooper AR, Montgomery AA, Norcross AJ, Peters TJ, Sharp DJ, et al. Diet or diet plus physical activity versus usual care in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: the Early ACTID randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;378:129–39. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60442-X21705068
  71. Strong M, Oakley JE, Brennan A. Estimating multiparameter partial expected value of perfect information from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis sample: a nonparametric regression approach. Med Decis Making 2014;34:311–26. 10.1177/0272989X1350591024246566
← Implications for practice and lessons learntAdditional information →

Attribution. Melanie J Davies; Shona Agarwal; Danielle H Bodicoat; Alan Brennan; Simon Dixon; Helen Eborall et al. (2025). Increasing uptake of self-management education programmes for type 2 diabetes in primary care: the Embedding research programme including an RCT. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2025 Davies et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK612496. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support