Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Intravitreal aflibercept compared with panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: the CLARITY non-inferiority RCT›Acknowledgements

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Intravitreal aflibercept compared with panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: the CLARITY non-inferiority RCT · Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

CC BY 4.0 · NIHR Journals Library · approximately 4 min read

The authors would like to thank the following for their invaluable help:

Essential support and guidance was provided by the KCTU, the service user group, the TSC (chairperson Alistair Laidlaw) and the DMEC (chairperson Sarah Walker). We would also like to thank the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust Pharmacists and members of the independent UK Network of Ophthalmic Reading Centres (NetwORC UK) for their support of the trial. We would like to thank the lay panel in the North East Diabetes Research Network and Mr Richard Lane OBE (Officer of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire), lay representative grant co-applicant.

We would also like to express thanks to the NIHR Local Clinical Research Networks.

Finally, and most importantly, we would like to thank all the patients who took part in the study and the follow-up survey.

Support

The study was sponsored by NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre and supported by the UK Clinical Research Network. The research was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, the NIHR Moorfields Clinical Research Facility and the UK Clinical Research Collaboration-registered KCTU at King’s Health Partners, which is part funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. We would also like to thank Maggie Shergill, the Research Manager (Monitoring) and the other team members of the NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre (NETSCC).

Contributions of authors

All authors reviewed, revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Sobha Sivaprasad (Professor, Consultant Ophthalmologist) was the chief investigator and co-authored the first draft.

Philip Hykin (Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon) was a co-applicant, was involved in the design and recruitment of the study and co-authored the first draft.

A Toby Prevost (Professor, Medical Statistics) was a co-applicant, was involved in the design and statistical analysis of the study and co-authored the first draft.

Joana Vasconcelos (Research Fellow, Medical Statistics) was involved in the design and statistical analysis of the study and co-authored the first draft.

Amy Riddell (Trial Manager) was involved in all aspects of the study’s management and monitoring and co-authored the first draft.

Jayashree Ramu (Research Fellow, Moorfields Eye Hospital) was involved in the design and recruitment of the study and co-authored the first draft.

Caroline Murphy (King’s Clinical Trial Unit) was a co-applicant and was involved in the design and trial management and co-authored the first draft.

Joanna Kelly (King’s Clinical Trial Unit) was a co-applicant, was involved in the design and data management and co-authored the first draft.

Rhiannon Tudor Edwards (Professor, Health Economics) was a co-applicant and was involved in the design, management, analysis and interpretation of the health economics part of the study, the co-authoring of the first draft and the writing up of the report.

Seow Tien Yeo (Research Fellow, Health Economics) was involved in the management, analysis and interpretation of the health economics part of the study, the co-authoring of the first draft and the writing up of the report.

James Bainbridge (Professor, Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon) was a co-applicant and was involved in the design of the study.

David Hopkins (Diabetologist) was a co-applicant and was involved in the design of the study.

Beverley White-Alao (King’s Clinical Trial Unit) was involved in the protocol development and study management and co-authored the first draft.

Publications

Sivaprasad S, Prevost AT, Bainbridge J, Edwards RT, Hopkins D, Kelly J, et al. Clinical efficacy and mechanistic evaluation of aflibercept for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (acronym CLARITY): a multicentre phase IIb randomised active-controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open 2015;5:e008405.

Sivaprasad S, Prevost AT, Vasconcelos JC, Riddell A, Murphy C, Kelly J, et al. Clinical efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept versus panretinal photocoagulation for best corrected visual acuity in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy at 52 weeks (CLARITY): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 2b, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2017;389:2193–203.

Nicholson L, Crosby-Nwaobi R, Vasconcelos JC, Prevost AT, Ramu J, Riddell A, et al. Mechanistic evaluation of panretinal photocoagulation versus aflibercept in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: CLARITY substudy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018;59:4277–84.

Data-sharing statement

Data are archived at Moorfields Eye Hospital. All data requests should be submitted to the corresponding author for consideration. Access to anonymised data may be granted following review.

Patient data

This work uses data provided by patients and collected by the NHS as part of their care and support. Using patient data is vital to improve health and care for everyone. There is huge potential to make better use of information from people’s patient records, to understand more about disease, develop new treatments, monitor safety, and plan NHS services. Patient data should be kept safe and secure, to protect everyone’s privacy, and it’s important that there are safeguards to make sure that it is stored and used responsibly. Everyone should be able to find out about how patient data are used. #datasaveslifes You can find out more about the background to this citation here: https://understandingpatientdata.org.uk/data-citation.

Disclaimers

This report presents independent research. The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, the MRC, NETSCC, the EME programme or the Department of Health and Social Care. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors, those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the EME programme or the Department of Health and Social Care.

← References

Attribution. Sobha Sivaprasad; Philip Hykin; A Toby Prevost; Joana Vasconcelos; Amy Riddell; Jayashree Ramu et al. (2018). Intravitreal aflibercept compared with panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: the CLARITY non-inferiority RCT. NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2018. This work was produced by Sivaprasad et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK531673. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Acknowledgements

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support