Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Intravitreal aflibercept compared with panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: the CLARITY non-inferiority RCT›Conclusion

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Intravitreal aflibercept compared with panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: the CLARITY non-inferiority RCT · Conclusion

Conclusion

CC BY 4.0 · NIHR Journals Library · approximately 1 min read

In conclusion, this is the second study to show non-inferiority of anti-VEGF therapy to PRP and the first study to show superiority of an anti-VEGF agent to PRP in eyes with PDR. If society is willing to pay £1400 for an additional 1-point improvement in BCVA, then aflibercept has a 56.60% probability of being cost-effective at the list price of £816. The trial outcomes are further augmented by the higher satisfaction scores of patients treated with aflibercept than with PRP. However, this is a 52-week study while PDR is a lifelong condition and so longer-term studies are required to evaluate long-term patient compliance and the disease-modifying effect of anti-VEGF agents in PDR. Therefore, the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the different anti-VEGF agents in PDR have to be evaluated in Phase III clinical trials for global adoption of anti-VEGF as a treatment adoption for PDR.

← DiscussionReferences →

Attribution. Sobha Sivaprasad; Philip Hykin; A Toby Prevost; Joana Vasconcelos; Amy Riddell; Jayashree Ramu et al. (2018). Intravitreal aflibercept compared with panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: the CLARITY non-inferiority RCT. NIHR Journals Library. Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2018. This work was produced by Sivaprasad et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK531673. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Conclusion

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support