Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Methylphenidate versus placebo for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: the MePFAC randomised controlled trial›List of supplementary material

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Methylphenidate versus placebo for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: the MePFAC randomised controlled trial · List of supplementary material

List of supplementary material

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 1 min read

  • Methylphenidate versus placebo for fatigue in advanced cancer Protocol v14.0 17 January 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan v7 31 July 2023
  • Predictors of missingness
  • Kaplan–Meier survival curves
  • Changes in response to COVID
  • Research Active Hospices Report
  • EAPC Conference Abstract

Supplementary material can be found on the NIHR Journals Library report page (https://doi.org/10.3310/GJPS6321).

Supplementary material has been provided by the authors to support the report and any files provided at submission will have been seen by peer reviewers, but not extensively reviewed. Any supplementary material provided at a later stage in the process may not have been peer reviewed.

← Additional information

Attribution. Patrick Stone; Ollie Minton; Alison Richardson; Peter Buckle; Zinat E Enayat; Louise Marston et al. (2025). Methylphenidate versus placebo for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: the MePFAC randomised controlled trial. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2025 Stone et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK616759. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • List of supplementary material

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support