Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›New and emerging technology for adult social care – the example of home sensors with artificial intelligence (AI) technology›References

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

New and emerging technology for adult social care – the example of home sensors with artificial intelligence (AI) technology · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 7 min read

  1. Bottery S, Ward D. Social Care 360. London: The King’s Fund; 2021.
  2. House of Commons Health and Social Care and Housing CaLGC. Long-term Funding of Adult Social Care. London: House of Commons; 2018.
  3. Skills for Care. Scoping Study on the Emerging Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Robotics in Social Care: Final Report. Leeds: Skills for Care; 2018.
  4. Rocks S, Boccarini G, Charlesworth A, Idriss O, McConkey R, Rachet-Jacquet L. Health and Social Care Funding Projections 2021. London: The Health Foundation; 2021.
  5. Skills for Care. The State of the Adult Social Care Sector and Workforce in England: 2021. Leeds: Skills for Care; 2021.
  6. Dixon J. Health Foundation Response to ONS Data on Deaths Involving COVID-19 in the Care Sector and the Results of the COVID-19 Surveillance Study in Care Homes (Vivaldi). London: The Health Foundation; 2020.
  7. Dunn P, Allen L, Alarilla A, Grimm F, Humphries R, Alderwick H. Adult Social Care and COVID-19 After the First Wave: Assessing the Policy Response in England. London: The Health Foundation; 2021.
  8. Wright J. Technology in Social Care: Review of the UK Policy Landscape. Sheffield: CIRCLE; 2020.
  9. Iacobucci G. New health secretary pledges £0.5bn to transform technology in NHS. BMJ 2018;362:k3201. 10.1136/bmj.k3201.30030239
  10. NHS England. The NHS Long Term Plan. Leeds: NHSE; 2019.
  11. HM Government. A Guide to Using Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: Guidance on Building and Using Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector; 2019. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/a-guide-to-using-artificial-intelligence-in-the-public-sector (accessed 9 August 2022).
  12. Department of Health and Social Care and the Rt Hon Sajid Javid MP. Major Reforms to NHS Workforce Planning a Tech Agenda. Leeds: Health Education England; 2021.
  13. Health Education England. The Topol Review: Preparing the Healthcare Workforce to Deliver the Digital Future. Leeds: Health Education England; 2019.
  14. Department of Health and Social Care. People at the Heart of Care: Adult Social Care Reform White Paper. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 2021.
  15. Hutchings R. The Impact of COVID-19 on the Use of Digital Technology in the NHS. London: The Nuffield Trust; 2020.
  16. Turner KJ, McGee-Lennon MR. Advances in telecare over the past 10 years. Smart Homecare Technol Telehealth 2013; 1:21–4.
  17. Doughty K, Cameron K, Garner P. Three generations of telecare of the elderly. J Telemed Telecare 1996;2:71–80.
  18. Barrett D, Thorpe J, Goodwin N, Barrett D, Thorpe J, Goodwin N. Examining perspectives on telecare: factors influencing adoption, implementation, and usage. Med Device Evid Res 2015;8:11–9.
  19. Daly Lynn J, Rondón-Sulbarán J, Quinn E, Ryan A, McCormack B, Martin S. A systematic review of electronic assistive technology within supporting living environments for people with dementia. Dementia 2019;18:2371–435.28990408
  20. Knapp M, Barlow J, Comas-Herrera A, Damant J, Freddolino P, Hamblin K, et al. The Case for Investment in Technology to Manage the Global Costs of Dementia. London: Policy Innovation and Research Unit (PIRU); 2016.
  21. The AHSN Network. Accelerating Artificial Intelligence in Health and Care: Results from a State of the Nation Survey. Wessex: AHSN Network/DHSC/NHS; 2018.
  22. HM Government. Personalised Health and Care 2020, Using Data and Technology to Transform Outcomes for Patients and Citizens. London: HM Government; 2014.
  23. HM Government. Industrial Strategy Building a Britain Fit for the Future. London: HM Government; 2017.
  24. Coşar S, Fernandez-Carmona M, Agrigoroaie R, Pages J, Ferland F, Zhao F, et al. ENRICHME: perception and interaction of an assistive robot for the elderly at home. Int J Soc Robot 2020;12:779–805. 10.1007/s12369-019-00614-y.
  25. Lariviere M, Abdi S, Spann A, Smith SK, Hamblin K, Hawley M, et al. The Role of Technology in Making Care Arrangements Sustainable. Sheffield: University of Sheffield. CIRCLE; 2018.
  26. Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernández J-L, Beecham J, Hirani SP, Beynon M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of telecare for people with social care needs: the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. Age Ageing 2014;43:794–800.24950690
  27. Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernández J-L, Beecham J, Hirani SP, Cartwright M, et al. Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long-term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2013;346:.f1035.23520339
  28. Hendy J, Chrysanthaki T, Barlow J, Knapp M, Rogers A, Sanders C, et al. An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:403.23153014
  29. Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernández JL, Beecham J, Hirani SP, Beynon M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of telecare for people with social care needs: the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. Age Ageing 2014;43:794–800. 10.1093/ageing/afu067.24950690
  30. Chrysanthaki T, Hendy J, Barlow J. Stimulating whole system redesign: lessons from an organizational analysis of the Whole System Demonstrator programme. J Health Serv Res Policy 2013;18:47–55.27552779
  31. Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M, et al. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:220.22834978
  32. Department of Health. Whole System Demonstrator Programme: Headline Findings. London: Department of Health; 2011.
  33. Greenhalgh T. Whole System Demonstrator trial: policy, politics, and publication ethics. BMJ: Br Med J 2012;345:e5280. 10.1136/bmj.e5280.22868961
  34. Rostill H, Nilforooshan R, Barnaghi P, Morgan A. Technology-integrated dementia care: trial results. Nurs Resid Care 2019;21:489–94.
  35. Rostill H, Nilforooshan R, Morgan A, Barnaghi P, Ream E, Chrysanthaki T. Technology integrated health management for dementia. Br J Community Nurs 2018;23:502–8.30290728
  36. Gathercole R, Bradley R, Harper E, Davies L, Pank L, Lam N, et al. Assistive technology and telecare to maintain independent living at home for people with dementia: the ATTILA RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021;25:1–156. 10.3310/hta25190.
  37. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, Hinder S, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e367.29092808
  38. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A’Court C, et al. Analysing the role of complexity in explaining the fortunes of technology programmes: empirical application of the NASSS framework. BMC Med 2018;16:66. 10.1186/s12916-018-1050-6.29754584
  39. Greenhalgh T, Fahy N, Shaw S. The bright elusive butterfly of value in health technology development; comment on “providing value to new health technology: the early contribution of entrepreneurs, investors, and regulatory agencies”. Int J Health Policy Manag 2018;7:81–5. 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.65.29325407
  40. Hamblin K. Technology and social care in a digital world: challenges and opportunities in the UK. J Enabling Technol 2020;14:115–25. 10.1108/JET-11-2019-0052.
  41. Crellin N, Sherlaw-Johnson C, Hutchings R, Oung C, Rolewicz L, Kumpunen S, et al. 10 Practical Lessons for Implementing Digital Innovations – Learning from the Care City Test Bed. London: Nuffield Trust; 2021.
  42. County Councils Network. Employing Assistive Technology in Adult Social Care. London: County Councils Network; 2021.
  43. Carers UK. Carers and Telecare. London: Carers UK; 2012.
  44. Sriram V, Jenkinson C, Peters M. Informal carers’ experience of assistive technology use in dementia care at home: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2019;19:160.31196003
  45. Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P, De Witte L. Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A systematic review into effects and effectiveness. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2012;13:114–20. e1.21450215
  46. UK Government. Government Technology Innovation Strategy. UK Government 10 June 2019. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-government-technology-innovation-strategy/the-government-technology-innovation-strategy (accessed 9 August 2022).
  47. Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Rouncefield M. What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. BMC Med 2015;13:91.25902803
  48. Eccles A. Remote care technologies, older people and the social care crisis in the United Kingdom: a Multiple Streams Approach to understanding the ‘silver bullet’ of telecare policy. Ageing Soc 2021;41:1726–47. 10.1017/S0144686X19001776.
  49. Watson P, Bearpark T, Ling J. The impact of rapid response and telecare services on elderly and vulnerable residents. Health Soc Care Community 2020;29:897–904.32803816
  50. Walton H, Harshfield A, Tomini S, Ng, Pei Li, Cowan K, Sussex J, Fulop N. Innovations in Adult Social Care and Social Work Report. Birmingham/London: BRACE/RSET; 2019
  51. Cowan K, Fulop NJ, Harshfield A, Ng PL, Ntouva A, Sidhu M, et al. Rapid prioritisation of topics for rapid evaluation: the case of innovations in adult social care and social work. Health Res Policy Syst 2021;19:34. 10.1186/s12961-021-00693-2.33691703
  52. Felizardo KR, Mendes E, Kalinowski M, Souza ÉF, Vijaykumar NL. Using Forward Snowballing to Update Systematic Reviews in Software Engineering. Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, abstract no. 58, pp. 1–6.
  53. Braun VC. What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2014;9. 10.3402/qhw.v9.26152.
  54. Saldaña J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 3rd edn. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University; 2016.
  55. Rowley J. Conducting research interviews. Manag Res Rev 2012;35:260–71.
  56. Iacono VL, Symonds P, Brown DH. Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Sociol Res Online 2016;21:1–12.
  57. Simon H. Administrative Behaviour. New York: Macmillan; 1945.
  58. Powell M. The policy process. In Glasby J, editor. Evidence, Policy and Practice: Critical Perspectives in Health and Social Care Bristol: Policy Press; 2011.
  59. Lindblom CE. The science of “muddling through”. Public Admin Rev 1959;19:79–88. 10.2307/973677.
  60. Sherlaw-Johnson C, Crellin N, Hutchings R, Oung C, Rolewicz L, Elias L, et al. Evaluation of the Care City Wave 2 Test Bed. London: Nuffield Trust; 2021.
← Acknowledgements

Attribution. Jon Glasby; Ian Litchfield; Sarah Parkinson; Lucy Hocking; Denise Tanner; Bridget Roe et al. (2023). New and emerging technology for adult social care – the example of home sensors with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2023 Glasby et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK593317. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support