Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team›References

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 14 min read

  1. Smith J, Parkinson S, Harshfield A, Sidhu M. Early evidence of the development of primary care networks in England: a rapid evaluation study. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2022;10:27.
  2. Sidhu M, Pollard J, Sussex J. Vertical integration of GP practices with acute hospitals in England and Wales: rapid evaluation. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2022;10(17). 10.3310/TLLA3317
  3. Ellins J, Hocking L, Al-Haboubi M, Newbould J, Fenton S-J, Daniel K, et al. Early evaluation of the Children and Young People’s Mental Health Trailblazer programme: a rapid mixed-methods study. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2023;11(8). 10.3310/XQWU4117
  4. Saunders CL, Gkousis E. Impact of telephone triage on access to primary care for people living with multiple long-term health conditions: rapid evaluation. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2022;10(18). 10.3310/UCCE5549
  5. Fulop N, Walton H, Crellin N, Georghiou T, Herlitz L, Litchfield I, et al. A rapid mixed methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2023;11(13). 10.3310/fvqw4410
  6. Sidhu M, Litchfield I, Miller R, Fulop NJ, Janta B, Tanner J-R, et al. Using pulse oximeters in care homes for residents with COVID-19 and other conditions: a rapid mixed-methods evaluation. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2022;10(35). 10.3310/PQWC3425
  7. Glasby J, Litchfield I, Parkinson S, Hocking L, Tanner D, Roe B, Bousfield J. New and emerging technology for adult social care – the example of home sensors with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2023;11(9):1–64. 10.3310/HRYW428
  8. Newbould J, Hocking L, Sidhu M, Daniel K. Digital first primary care for those with multiple long-term conditions: the views of stakeholders. Health Soc Care Deliv Res (under review).
  9. Sidhu M, Saunders C, Davies C, McKenna G, Wu F, Litchfield I, et al. Vertical integration of general practices with acute hospitals in England: rapid impact evaluation. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2023;11(17). 10.3310/PRWQ4012
  10. Daniel K, Bousfield J, Hocking L, Jackson L, Taylor B. Evaluation of Women’s Health Hubs. Health Soc Care Deliv Res (under review).
  11. Skou ST, Mair FS, Fortin M, Guthrie B, Nunes BP, Miranda JJ, et al. Multimorbidity. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2022;8(48). 10.1038/s41572-022-00376-4
  12. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE Guideline NG56 . Multimorbidity: Clinical Assessment and Management. 2016. URL: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng56 (accessed 23 February 2023).
  13. Aiden H. Multimorbidity. Understanding the Challenge: A Report for the Richmond Group of Charities. 2018. URL: https://richmondgroupofcharities.org.uk/sites/default/files/multimorbidity_-_understanding_the_challenge.pdf (accessed 23 February 2023).
  14. Head A, Fleming K, Kypridemos C, Schofield P, Pearson-Stuttard J, O’Flaherty M. Inequalities in incident and prevalent multimorbidity in England, 2004–19: a population-based, descriptive study. Lancet Healthy Longev 2021;2:e489–97. 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00146-X36097998
  15. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2012;380:37–43. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-222579043
  16. Hayanga B, Stafford M, Bécares L. Ethnic inequalities in multiple long-term health conditions in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Public Health 2023;23:178. 10.1186/s12889-022-14940-w36703163
  17. Saunders CL, MacCarthy S, Meads C, Massou E, Mant J, Saunders AM, Elliott MN. Long-term conditions among sexual minority adults in England: evidence from a cross-sectional analysis of responses to the English GP Patient Survey. BJGP Open 2021;5:BJGPO.2021.0067. 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0067
  18. Whitty CJM, MacEwen C, Goddard A, Alderson D, Marshall M, Calderwood C, et al. Rising to the challenge of multimorbidity. BMJ 2020;368:l6964. 10.1136/bmj.l696431907164
  19. Coventry PA, Small N, Panagioti M, Adeyemi I, Bee P. Living with complexity; marshalling resources: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of lived experience of mental and physical multimorbidity. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:171. 10.1186/s12875-015-0345-326597934
  20. World Health Organization. Multimorbidity: Technical Series on Safer Primary Care. 2016. URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252275/9789241511650-eng.pdf;jsessionid=134B666EACCD92A2158822CA1C45E8SB?sequence=1 (accessed 7 October 2019).
  21. NHS England. NHS Long Term Plan. 2019. URL: www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/nhs-long-term-plan-version-1.2.pdf (accessed 23 February 2023).
  22. The AHSN Network, NHS England. National Survey of Local Innovation and Research Needs of the NHS. 2019. URL: www.ahsnnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/National-survey-of-local-research-and-innovation-needs-of-the-NHS.pdf (accessed 5 April 2023).
  23. The Academy of Medical Sciences. Multimorbidity: A Priority for Global Health Research. 2018. URL: https://acmedsci.ac.uk/file-download/82222577 (accessed 23 February 2023).
  24. Taskforce on Multiple Conditions. Just One Thing After Another. Living with Multiple Conditions: A Report from the Taskforce on Multiple Conditions. 2018. URL: https://richmondgroupofcharities.org.uk/sites/default/files/final_just_one_thing_after_another_report_-_singles.pdf (accessed 5 April 2023).
  25. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Best Research for Best Health: The Next Chapter. 2021. URL: www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/about-us/best-research-for-best-health-the-next-chapter.pdf (accessed 23 February 2023).
  26. Department of Health and Social Care. Areas of Research Interest. 2023. URL: www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/dhsc-areas-of-research-interest/32536 (accessed 24 March 2023).
  27. Lamont T, Bower P, Hay E, Mahtani K, Salisbury C. How can we fund research for people, not conditions? BMJ 2022;379:o2799. 10.1136/bmj.o279936400450
  28. Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ 2015;350:h2147. 10.1136/bmj.h214725956159
  29. Cowan KO, Sandy. The James Lind Alliance Guidebook. Version 5. 2013. URL: www.jlaguidebook.org/pdfguidebook/guidebook.pdf (accessed 2 March 2023).
  30. Coulter A, Roberts S, Dixon A. Delivering Better Services for People with Long-term Conditions: Building the House of Care. 2013. URL: www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/delivering-better-services-for-people-with-long-term-conditions.pdf (accessed 24 March 2023).
  31. Leijten FRM, Struckmann V, van Ginneken E, Czypionka T, Kraus M, Reiss M, et al.; SELFIE consortium. The SELFIE framework for integrated care for multi-morbidity: development and description. Health Policy 2018;122:12–22. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.06.00228668222
  32. Weisz G. The emergence of medical specialization in the nineteenth century. Bull Hist Med 2003;77:536–75. 10.1353/bhm.2003.015014523260
  33. Oldham J. What do patients want? Generalists versus specialists and the importance of continuity. Future Hosp J 2016;3:75–6. 10.7861/futurehosp.3-1-7531098187
  34. Sidhu M, Pollard J, Sussex J. Vertical integration of primary care practices with acute hospitals in England and Wales: why, how and so what? Findings from a qualitative, rapid evaluation. BMJ Open 2022;12:e053222. 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053222
  35. O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ 2010;341:c4587. 10.1136/bmj.c458720851841
  36. NHS England. 2022/23 Priorities and Operational Planning Guidance. 2022. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/publication/2022-23-priorities-and-operational-planning-guidance/ (accessed 23 March 2023).
  37. Consultative Council on Medical and Allied Services. The Dawson Report on the Future Provision of Medical and Allied Services 1920: An Interim Report to the Minister of Health. The Dawson report: King Edward’s Hospital Fund for London; 1950.
  38. Naylor C, Das P, Ross S, Honeyman M, Thompson J, Gilburt H. Bringing Together Physical and Mental Health. A New Frontier for Integrated Care. 2016. URL: www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/Bringing-together-Kings-Fund-March-2016_1.pdf (accessed 5 April 2023).
  39. Vaughan L, Bardsley M, Bell D, Davies M, Goddard A, Imison C, et al. Models of generalist and specialist care in smaller hospitals in England: a mixed-methods study. Health Soc Care Deliv Res 2021;9:4. 10.3310/hsdr09040
  40. Future Hospital Programme. Future Hospital: Caring for Medical Patients. A Report from the Future Hospital Commission to the Royal College of Physicians. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2013. URL: www.rcplondon.ac.uk/futurehospital (accessed 24 March 2023).
  41. Future Hospital Programme. Delivering the Future Hospital. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2017. URL: www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/future-hospital-programme-delivering-future-hospital (accessed 24 March 2023).
  42. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA 2002;288:1775–9. 10.1001/jama.288.14.177512365965
  43. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q 1996;74:511–44.8941260
  44. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 2005;83:457–502. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x16202000
  45. Baxter S, Johnson M, Chambers D, Sutton A, Goyder E, Booth A. The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:350. 10.1186/s12913-018-3161-329747651
  46. Sandvik H, Hetlevik O, Blinkenberg J, Hunskaar S. Continuity in general practice as predictor of mortality, acute hospitalisation, and use of out-of-hours care: a registry-based observational study in Norway. Br J Gen Pract 2022;72:e84–90. 10.3399/bjgp.2021.034034607797
  47. Ewbank L, Lamming L, Cream J, Wenzel L. Admin Matters: The Impact of NHS Administration on Patient Care. The King’s Fund; 2021. URL: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/admin-matters-nhs-patient-care (accessed 23 March 2023).
  48. National Voices. Paper Works: The Critical Role of Administration in Quality Care. 2021. www.nationalvoices.org.uk/sites/default/files/public/publications/paper_works_-_the_critical_role_of_administration_in_quality_care_final.pdf (accessed 23 March 2023).
  49. National Institute for Health and Care Research. NIHR Strategic Framework for Multiple Long-term Conditions (Multimorbidity) MLTC-M Research. 2020. URL: www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/nihr-strategic-framework-for-multiple-long-term-conditions-multimorbidity-mltc-m-research/24639 (accessed 24 March 2023).
  50. Ingram E, Ledden S, Beardon S, Gomes M, Hogarth S, McDonald H, et al. Household and area-level social determinants of multimorbidity: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2021;75:232–41. 10.1136/jech-2020-21469133158940
  51. Rodgers H, Howel D, Bhattarai N, Cant R, Drummond A, Ford G, et al. Evaluation of an Extended Stroke Rehabilitation Service (EXTRAS). Stroke 2019;50:3561–8. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.02487631637972
  52. Shaw L, Bhattarai N, Cant R, Drummond A, Ford GA, Forster A, et al. An extended stroke rehabilitation service for people who have had a stroke: the EXTRAS RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020;24:24. 10.3310/hta24240
  53. Marmor T. Fads in Medical Care Management and Policy. Nuffield Trust; 2004. URL: www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/research/fads-in-medical-care-management-and-policy (accessed 24 March 2023).
  54. Norman G, Bennett P, Vardy E. Virtual wards: a rapid evidence synthesis and implications for the care of older people. Age Ageing 2023;52:afac319. 10.1093/ageing/afac31936633298
  55. Arsenault-Lapierre G, Henein M, Gaid D, Le Berre M, Gore G, Vedel I. Hospital-at-home interventions vs in-hospital stay for patients with chronic disease who present to the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open 2021;4:e2111568–68-e. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1156834100939
  56. Lloyd T, Beech J, Wolters A, Tallack C. Realising the Potential of Community-based Multidisciplinary Teams: Insights from Evidence. The Health Foundation; 2023. 10.37829/HF-2023-IAU01
  57. O’Mahony D, O’Sullivan D, Byrne S, O’Connor MN, Ryan C, Gallagher P. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age Ageing 2014;44:213–8. 10.1093/ageing/afu14525324330
  58. The Health Foundation. Person-centred Care Made Simple: What Everyone Should Know about Person-centred Care. London: The Health Foundation; 2016. URL: www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/PersonCentredCareMadeSimple.pdf (accessed 24 March 2023).
  59. Ham C, Charles A, Wellings D. Shared Responsibility for Health: The Cultural Change We Need. London: The King’s Fund; 2018. URL: www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/shared-responsibility-health (accessed 23 March 2023).
  60. Wanless D. Securing Our Future Health: Taking a Long-term View. Final report. London: HM Treasury; 2022.
  61. Ware P, Shah A, Ross HJ, Logan AG, Segal P, Cafazzo JA, et al. Challenges of telemonitoring programs for complex chronic conditions: randomized controlled trial with an embedded qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2022;24:e31754. 10.2196/3175435080502
  62. Scheibe M, Lang C, Druschke D, Arnold K, Luntz E, Schmitt J, Holthoff-Detto V. Independent use of a home-based telemonitoring app by older patients with multimorbidity and mild cognitive impairment: qualitative study. JMIR Hum Factors 2021;8:e27156. 10.2196/2715634255664
  63. Breckner A, Litke N, Göbl L, Wiezorreck L, Miksch A, Szecsenyi J, et al. Effects and Processes of an mHealth Intervention for the Management of Chronic Diseases: Prospective Observational Study. JMIR Form Res 2022;6:e34786. 10.2196/3478636006666
  64. Lear SA, Norena M, Banner D, Whitehurst DGT, Gill S, Burns J, et al. Assessment of an interactive digital health-based self-management program to reduce hospitalizations among patients with multiple chronic diseases: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open 2021;4:e2140591–91-e. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4059134962560
  65. Roca S, Lozano ML, García J, Alesanco A. Validation of a virtual assistant for improving medication adherence in patients with comorbid type 2 diabetes mellitus and depressive disorder. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:12056. www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/1205634831811
  66. Hernandez-Quiles C, Bernabeu-Wittel M, Barón-Franco B, Palacios AA, Garcia-Serrano MR, Lopez-Jimeno W, et al. A randomized clinical trial of home telemonitoring in patients with advanced heart and lung diseases. J Telemed Telecare 2021;30(2):356–64. 10.1177/1357633x21105970734851202
  67. Lang C, Voigt K, Neumann R, Bergmann A, Holthoff-Detto V. Adherence and acceptance of a home-based telemonitoring application used by multi-morbid patients aged 65 years and older. J Telemed Telecare 2022;28:37–51. 10.1177/1357633x2090140032009577
  68. Craven MP, Andrews JA, Lang AR, Simblett SK, Bruce S, Thorpe S, et al.; RADAR-CNS Consortium. Informing the development of a digital health platform through universal points of care: qualitative survey study. JMIR Form Res 2020;4:e22756. 10.2196/2275633242009
  69. Chacornac M, Faoro A, Texereau J, Billoet C, Hominal S. Performance of an eHealth (NOMHAD) system comprising telemonitoring, telenotification, and telecoaching for patients with multimorbidity: proof-of-concept study. JMIR Form Res 2022;6:e32205. 10.2196/3220535275068
  70. Sheng Y, Doyle J, Bond R, Jaiswal R, Gavin S, Dinsmore J. Home-based digital health technologies for older adults to self-manage multiple chronic conditions: a data-informed analysis of user engagement from a longitudinal trial. Digital Health 2022;8:20552076221125957. 10.1177/2055207622112595736171962
  71. Kroenke K, Baye F, Lourens SG, Evans E, Weitlauf S, McCalley S, et al. Automated self-management (ASM) vs ASM-enhanced collaborative care for chronic pain and mood symptoms: the CAMMPS randomized clinical trial. J Gen Intern Med 2019;34:1806–14. 10.1007/s11606-019-05121-431228055
  72. Bevan G, Hood C. What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Adm 2006;84:517–38. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x
  73. Crump H, King J, Graham C, Thorlby R, Raleigh V, Redding D, Goodwin N. Developing a user reported measure of care co-ordination. Int J Integr Care 2017;17(1):4. 10.5334/ijic.2469
  74. Royal College of General Practitioners. Continuity of Care Work at RCGP. 2021. URL: www.rcgp.org.uk/blog/continuity-of-care-work-at-rcgp (accessed 19 April 2023).
  75. Reinhoudt-den Boer L, van Wijngaarden J, Huijsman R. How do clients with multiple problems and (in)formal caretakers coproduce integrated care and support? A longitudinal study on integrated care trajectories of clients with multiple problems. Health Expect 2023;26:268–81. 10.1111/hex.1365336523166
  76. Nolte E, Knai C, Hofmarcher M, Conklin A, Erler A, Elissen A, et al. Overcoming fragmentation in health care: chronic care in Austria, Germany and the Netherlands. Health Econ Policy Law 2012;7:125–46. 10.1017/S174413311100033822221931
  77. National Voices. What We Need Now. What Matters to People for Health and Care, During COVID-19 and Beyond – New National Voices I Statements 2020. 2020. URL: https://s42139.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/What-We-Need-Now.pdf (accessed 18 Janaury 2023).
  78. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004;82:581–629. 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x15595944
  79. Marjanovic S, Altenhofer M, Hocking L, Chataway J, Ling T. Innovating for improved healthcare: sociotechnical and innovation systems perspectives and lessons from the NHS. Sci Public Policy 2020;47:283–97. 10.1093/scipol/scaa005
  80. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A’Court C, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e367. 10.2196/jmir.877529092808
  81. Baines R, Bradwell H, Edwards K, Stevens S, Prime S, Tredinnick-Rowe J, et al. Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation: a systematic review. Health Expect 2022;25:1232–45. 10.1111/hex.1350635526274
  82. Doyle J, Murphy E, Gavin S, Pascale A, Deparis S, Tommasi P, et al. A digital platform to support self-management of multiple chronic conditions (ProACT): findings in relation to engagement during a one-year proof-of-concept trial. J Med Internet Res 2021;23:e22672. 10.2196/2267234914612
  83. Robert G, Greenhalgh T, Macfarlane F, Peacock R. Adopting and assimilating new non-pharmaceutical technologies into health care: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2010;15:243–50. 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.00913720592046
  84. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Macfarlane F, Peacock R. How to Spread Good Ideas. A Systematic Review of the Literature on Diffusion, Dissemination and Sustainability of Innovations in Health Service Delivery and Organisation. National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation; 2004. URL: www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/saf/share/great-missenden/reference-papers/Overviews/NHS-lit-review.pdf (accessed 5 April 2023).
  85. Robert G, Greenhalgh T, MacFarlane F, Peacock R. Organisational Factors Influencing Technology Adoption and Assimilation in the NHS: A Systematic Literature Review NIHR. 2009. URL: https://njl-admin.nihr.ac.uk/document/download/2027646 (accessed 5 April 2023).
  86. Shaw J, Shaw S, Wherton J, Hughes G, Greenhalgh T. Studying scale-up and spread as social practice: theoretical introduction and empirical case study. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e244. 10.2196/jmir.748228687532
  87. Ettelt S, Mays N, Allen P. The multiple purposes of policy piloting and their consequences: three examples from national health and social care policy in England. J Soc Policy 2015;44:319–37. 10.1017/S0047279414000865
  88. de Vries H, Bekkers V, Tummers L. Innovation in the public sector: a systematic review and future research agenda. Public Adm 2016;94:146–66. 10.1111/padm.12209
  89. Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CHI. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci 2013;8:22. 10.1186/1748-5908-8-2223414420
  90. Healthcare Financial Management Association. NHS Finance – HFMA Introductory Guide. 2023. URL: www.hfma.org.uk/docs/default-source/publications/guides/intro-to-nhs-finance/hfma-introductory-guide-to-nhs-finance.pdf?sfvrsn=74dd76e7_20s-finance.pdf?sfvrsn=74dd76e7_20 (accessed 15 March 2023).
  91. NHS England. Quality and Outcomes Framework Guidance for 2022/23 Version 2. 2022. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/PRN00027-qof-guidance-for-22-23-v2.pdf (accessed 15 March 2023).
  92. NHS England. NHS Five Year Forward View. 2014. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/publication/nhs-five-year-forward-view/ (accessed 20 March 2023).
  93. MacInnes J, Billings J, Coleman A, Mikelyte R, Croke S, Allen P, Checkland K. Scale and spread of innovation in health and social care: insights from the evaluation of the New Care Model/Vanguard programme in England. J Health Serv Res Policy 2023;28:128–37. 10.1177/1355819622113954836631723
  94. Department of Health and Social Care. The Government’s 2022–23 Mandate to NHS England. 2022. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1065713/2022-to-2023-nhs-england-mandate.pdf (accessed 20 March 2023).
  95. Stokes J, Guthrie B, Mercer SW, Rice N, Sutton M. Multimorbidity combinations, costs of hospital care and potentially preventable emergency admissions in England: A cohort study. PLOS Med 2021;18:e1003514. 10.1371/journal.pmed.100351433439870
  96. Guthrie B, Thompson A, Dumbreck S, Flynn A, Alderson P, Nairn M, et al. Better guidelines for better care: accounting for multimorbidity in clinical guidelines structured examination of exemplar guidelines and health economic modelling. Health Serv Deliv Res 2017;5(16). 10.3310/hsdr05160
  97. NHS England. Palliative and End of Life Care. Statutory Guidance for Integrated Care Boards (ICBs). 2022. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Palliative-and-End-of-Life-Care-Statutory-Guidance-for-Integrated-Care-Boards-ICBs-September-2022.pdf (accessed 21 March 2023).
  98. National Palliative and End of Life Care Partnership. Ambitions for Palliative and End of Life Care: A National Framework for Local Action 2021–2026. 2021. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/ambitions-for-palliative-and-end-of-life-care-2nd-edition.pdf (accessed 22 March 2023).
  99. Guy’s and St Thomas’ Charity. From One to Many. Exploring People’s Progression to Multiple Long-term Conditions in an Urban Environmen. 2018. URL: https://urbanhealth.org.uk/insights/reports/from-one-to-many (accessed 22 March 2023).
  100. National Voices. A Narrative for Person-centred Coordinated Care. 2013. URL: www.nationalvoices.org.uk/publications/our-publications/narrative-person-centred-coordinated-care (accessed 19 April 2023).
  101. National Voices and Centre for Mental Health. Ask How I Am: Supporting Emotional Health Among People Living With Long-term Conditions. 2021. URL: www.nationalvoices.org.uk/sites/default/files/public/publications/ask_how_i_am_final.pdf (accessed 23 March 2023).
  102. Walker PP, Pompilio PP, Zanaboni P, Bergmo TS, Prikk K, Malinovschi A, et al. Telemonitoring in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CHROMED) A randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;198:620–8. 10.1164/rccm.201712-2404OC29557669
  103. Barclay S. Government Action on Major Conditions and Diseases. Statement made on 24 January 2023 by Steve Barclay, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. 2023. URL: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2023-01-24/hcws514 (accessed 24 March 2023).
  104. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Being Inclusive in Public Involvement in Health and Care Research. Version 1.0. 2021. URL: www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/being-inclusive-in-public-involvement-in-health-and-care-research/27365 (accessed 5 April 2023).
  105. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Briefing Notes for Researchers – Public Involvement in NHS, Health and Social Care Research. Version 1.0. 2021. URL: www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/briefing-notes-for-researchers-public-involvement-in-nhs-health-and-social-care-research/27371 (accessed 5 April 2023).
  106. Bardsley M, Steventon A, Smith J, Dixon J. Evaluating Integrated and Community-based Care: How Do We Know What Works? London: Nuffield Trust; 2013.
  107. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Multiple Long-term Conditions – Studies Within a Project (SWAP). 2021. URL: www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/multiple-long-term-conditions-studies-within-a-project-swap/27818 (accessed 13 April 2023).
← Patient and public involvementAdditional information →

Attribution. Jon Sussex; Judith Smith; Frances M Wu (2024). Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2024 Sussex et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK604637. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support