Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Supporting self-care for eczema in the community: the Eczema Care Online research programme including two RCTs›Equality, diversity and inclusion

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Supporting self-care for eczema in the community: the Eczema Care Online research programme including two RCTs · Equality, diversity and inclusion

Equality, diversity and inclusion

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 2 min read

At all stages of the programme, we sought diversity among both research participants and public contributors. During intervention development, feedback was sought from a diverse group of 55 young people and parents/carers of children with eczema. We sampled participants from a wide range of ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds, ages, gender and eczema severity. During our clinical trial, we monitored participant characteristics and noticed early on that we were recruiting significantly fewer men aged 13–25 compared to women. In response, we carried out a review of invitation materials to help improve appeal to young men. We showed our study documents to five young men to obtain feedback which led to a series of changes, including adding a QR code to the invitation and making information about gift vouchers more prominent. While this resulted in a small increase in uptake among young men, they remained under-represented in the sample. This highlights the need to engage under-represented groups (in this case young men) more systematically in the earlier phases of intervention development. The INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework80 will be helpful in designing future trials and seeking to maximise inclusion and applicability to underserved groups, although was not available at the start of designing this trial. We are taking this practice forward in our ongoing programme grant Acne Care Online (NIHR PGfAR 202852).

We ensured that all programme materials used inclusive language (e.g. ‘parents and carers’ to include a range of family structures) and used inclusive imagery in all study materials (e.g. ethnic diversity). We iterated all public-facing materials with public contributors to maximise accessibility in terms of language and layout.

In implementing the interventions, we prioritised making the resources freely available to be used by any member of the public who needs them. This was emphasised as a priority throughout the programme by public contributors and is key to ensuring that the benefits of the intervention can be disseminated in a way that minimises the risk of increasing inequalities in health. We have achieved this in the short term by negotiating a 5-year web-hosting term with our commercial partners.

← Patient, public and practitioner involvement in the programmeReflections on what was and was not successful →

Attribution. Ingrid Muller; Beth Stuart; Tracey Sach; Lucy Yardley; Kate Greenwell; Taeko Becque et al. (2025). Supporting self-care for eczema in the community: the Eczema Care Online research programme including two RCTs. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2025 Muller et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK613110. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Equality, diversity and inclusion

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support