Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (954 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Discarded electronic devices containing valuable and sometimes hazardous materials such as LEAD, nickel, cadmium, and mercury. (from http://www.epa.gov/osw/conserve/materials/ecycling/faq.htm#impact accessed 4/25/2010)
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Electronic Wastes; Waste, Electronic; Wastes, Electronic; E-Scrap; E-Scraps; E-Waste; E-Wastes; End-of-Life Electronics.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Waste Products
Related concepts
- Nickel
- Cadmium
- Mercury
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 2,191 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Electronic Waste” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,053 of them (48.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 1,173 records.
Reviews account for 226 records (10.3%) and meta-analyses for 3. Randomized controlled trials number 2 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 0 |
| 2000-2009 | 4 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,173 |
| 2020 onward | 1,053 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 226 | 10.3% |
| Meta-analyses | 3 | 0.1% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 2 | 0.1% |
Method: PubMed query "Electronic Waste"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in public health and nutrition
Population and nutrition studies mostly observe what people eat, breathe or are exposed to and then look for links with health, which shows association and not proof of cause. Self-reported diet is imprecise, people who eat or live differently also differ in other ways, and effects measured across a population may not apply to one person. Check the study design, how exposure was measured, what else was accounted for and the size of the effect, not only whether it was statistically significant.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E-Waste and Harm to Vulnerable Populations: A Growing Global Problem | 2016 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 137 | cc0 PMID 26418733 · DOI · PMC4858409 |
| Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: an updated systematic review | 2021 | Systematic review Design not recorded in structured metadata | 96 | cc by PMID 34895498 · DOI · PMC8674120 |
| Heart Rate, Stress, and Occupational Noise Exposure among Electronic Waste Recycling Workers | 2016 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 41 | cc by PMID 26797626 · DOI · PMC4730531 |
| Fermentation-based oxalic acid production aimed at sustainable critical metal recovery from electronic waste | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 42776259 · DOI · PMC13601489 |
E-Waste and Harm to Vulnerable Populations: A Growing Global Problem [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundElectronic waste (e-waste) is produced in staggering quantities, estimated globally to be 41.
- Closing excerpt
- 1509699.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (296 words)
BackgroundElectronic waste (e-waste) is produced in staggering quantities, estimated globally to be 41.8 million tonnes in 2014. Informal e-waste recycling is a source of much-needed income in many low- to middle-income countries. However, its handling and disposal in underdeveloped countries is often unsafe and leads to contaminated environments. Rudimentary and uncontrolled processing methods often result in substantial harmful chemical exposures among vulnerable populations, including women and children. E-waste hazards have not yet received the attention they deserve in research and public health agendas.ObjectivesWe provide an overview of the scale and health risks. We review international efforts concerned with environmental hazards, especially affecting children, as a preface to presenting next steps in addressing health issues stemming from the global e-waste problem.DiscussionThe e-waste problem has been building for decades. Increased observation of adverse health effects from e-waste sites calls for protecting human health and the environment from e-waste contamination. Even if e-waste exposure intervention and prevention efforts are implemented, legacy contamination will remain, necessitating increased awareness of e-waste as a major environmental health threat.ConclusionGlobal, national, and local levels efforts must aim to create safe recycling operations that consider broad security issues for people who rely on e-waste processing for survival. Paramount to these efforts is reducing pregnant women and children's e-waste exposures to mitigate harmful health effects. With human environmental health in mind, novel dismantling methods and remediation technologies and intervention practices are needed to protect communities.CitationHeacock M, Kelly CB, Asante KA, Birnbaum LS, Bergman AL, Bruné MN, Buka I, Carpenter DO, Chen A, Huo X, Kamel M, Landrigan PJ, Magalini F, Diaz-Barriga F, Neira M, Omar M, Pascale A, Ruchirawat M, Sly L, Sly PD, Van den Berg M, Suk WA. 2016. E-waste and harm to vulnerable populations: a growing global problem. Environ Health Perspect 124:550-555; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509699.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc0 licence; © the authors. PMID 26418733 · DOI · PMC4858409
Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: an updated systematic review [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Electronic waste (e-waste) contains numerous chemicals harmful to human and ecological health.
- Closing excerpt
- Novel cost-effective methods for safe recycling operations need to be employed in e-waste sites to ensure the health and safety of vulnerable populations.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (197 words)
Electronic waste (e-waste) contains numerous chemicals harmful to human and ecological health. To update a 2013 review assessing adverse human health consequences of exposure to e-waste, we systematically reviewed studies reporting effects on humans related to e-waste exposure. We searched EMBASE, PsycNET, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PubMed for articles published between Dec 18, 2012, and Jan 28, 2020, restricting our search to publications in English. Of the 5645 records identified, we included 70 studies that met the preset criteria. People living in e-waste exposed regions had significantly elevated levels of heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants. Children and pregnant women were especially susceptible during the critical periods of exposure that detrimentally affect diverse biological systems and organs. Elevated toxic chemicals negatively impact on neonatal growth indices and hormone level alterations in e-waste exposed populations. We recorded possible connections between chronic exposure to e-waste and DNA lesions, telomere attrition, inhibited vaccine responsiveness, elevated oxidative stress, and altered immune function. The existence of various toxic chemicals in e-waste recycling areas impose plausible adverse health outcomes. Novel cost-effective methods for safe recycling operations need to be employed in e-waste sites to ensure the health and safety of vulnerable populations.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34895498 · DOI · PMC8674120
Heart Rate, Stress, and Occupational Noise Exposure among Electronic Waste Recycling Workers [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Electronic waste (e-waste) is a growing occupational and environmental health issue around the globe.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings suggest that occupational and non-occupational noise exposure is associated with elevations in average heart rate, which may in turn predict potential cardiovascular damage.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (239 words)
Electronic waste (e-waste) is a growing occupational and environmental health issue around the globe. E-waste recycling is a green industry of emerging importance, especially in low-and middle-income countries where much of this recycling work is performed, and where many people's livelihoods depend on this work. The occupational health hazards of e-waste recycling have not been adequately explored. We performed a cross-sectional study of noise exposures, heart rate, and perceived stress among e-waste recycling workers at a large e-waste site in Accra, Ghana. We interviewed 57 workers and continuously monitored their individual noise exposures and heart rates for up to 24 h. More than 40% of workers had noise exposures that exceeded recommended occupational (85 dBA) and community (70 dBA) noise exposure limits, and self-reported hearing difficulties were common. Workers also had moderate to high levels of perceived stress as measured via Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale, and reported a variety of symptoms that could indicate cardiovascular disease. Noise exposures were moderately and significantly correlated with heart rate (Spearman's ρ 0.46, p < 0.001). A mixed effects linear regression model indicated that a 1 dB increase in noise exposure was associated with a 0.17 increase in heart rate (p-value = 0.01) even after controlling for work activities, age, smoking, perceived stress, and unfavorable physical working conditions. These findings suggest that occupational and non-occupational noise exposure is associated with elevations in average heart rate, which may in turn predict potential cardiovascular damage.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26797626 · DOI · PMC4730531
Fermentation-based oxalic acid production aimed at sustainable critical metal recovery from electronic waste [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- This study systematically investigates the biogenic production of oxalic acid (OA, H2C2O4) via submerged fermentation to establish a sustainable reagent for critical metal recovery applications.
- Closing excerpt
- Gluconic acid and phosphate excess hinder selective OA production.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (222 words)
This study systematically investigates the biogenic production of oxalic acid (OA, H2C2O4) via submerged fermentation to establish a sustainable reagent for critical metal recovery applications. Preliminary shake-flask experiments evaluated Aspergillus niger strains (ATCC 1015 and CECT 2807), optimal carbon sources, and the influence of pH adjustment. Despite inherent biological variance across replicates, A. niger ATCC 1015 demonstrated a superior production trajectory, yielding 71.0 ± 27.7 mM OA in 5 days. Intermittent pH adjustment above 4.0 significantly enhanced secretion to 90.4 ± 5.8 mM, while glucose was identified as the optimal carbon source (YP/S ≈ 0.4 g/g). Building upon these preliminary findings, process intensification was conducted in a 10 L stirred-tank bioreactor. Transitioning to a fed-batch strategy with pulsed feeding and continuous pH control effectively contributed to substantially higher OA titers, achieving a peak OA titer of 260.1 ± 4.8 mM over 14 days. Co-production of gluconic acid and acidogenesis inhibition posed a challenge in attaining higher product yields. Collectively, these findings establish a robust, scalable bioprocess for sustainable OA generation, directly supporting its emerging application as a highly selective leaching agent for critical metal recovery from electronic waste streams. KEY POINTS: A.niger strain ATCC1015 was pinpointed as a suitable strain for biogenic OA production Fed-batch with pulsed feeding maximizes OA titer in scale-up. Gluconic acid and phosphate excess hinder selective OA production.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42776259 · DOI · PMC13601489
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: a systematic review [5]
- Research article How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electrical and electronic wastes [6]
- Research article Recovery of metals and nonmetals from electronic waste by physical and chemical recycling processes [7]
- Research article E-waste recycling: where does it go from here? [8]
- Research article Chemical hazards associated with treatment of waste electrical and electronic equipment [9]
- Research article Developmental neurotoxicants in e-waste: an emerging health concern [10]
References
- Heacock M, Kelly CB, Asante KA, Birnbaum LS, Bergman ÅL, Bruné MN, et al.. E-Waste and Harm to Vulnerable Populations: A Growing Global Problem. . 2016. PMID 26418733 · DOI · PMC4858409
- Parvez SM, Jahan F, Brune MN, Gorman JF, Rahman MJ, Carpenter D, et al.. Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: an updated systematic review. . 2021. PMID 34895498 · DOI · PMC8674120
- Burns KN, Sun K, Fobil JN, Neitzel RL. Heart Rate, Stress, and Occupational Noise Exposure among Electronic Waste Recycling Workers. . 2016. PMID 26797626 · DOI · PMC4730531
- Erkmen AN, Ulber R, Jüstel T, Altendorfner M. Fermentation-based oxalic acid production aimed at sustainable critical metal recovery from electronic waste. . 2026. PMID 42776259 · DOI · PMC13601489
- Grant K, Goldizen FC, Sly PD, Brune MN, Neira M, van den Berg M, et al.. Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health. 2013. PMID 25104600 · DOI
- Ongondo FO, Williams ID, Cherrett TJ. How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electrical and electronic wastes. Waste Manag. 2011. PMID 21146974 · DOI
- Kaya M. Recovery of metals and nonmetals from electronic waste by physical and chemical recycling processes. Waste Manag. 2016. PMID 27543174 · DOI
- Zhang K, Schnoor JL, Zeng EY. E-waste recycling: where does it go from here?. Environ Sci Technol. 2012. PMID 22998401 · DOI
- Tsydenova O, Bengtsson M. Chemical hazards associated with treatment of waste electrical and electronic equipment. Waste Manag. 2011. PMID 20869229 · DOI
- Chen A, Dietrich KN, Huo X, Ho SM. Developmental neurotoxicants in e-waste: an emerging health concern. Environ Health Perspect. 2011. PMID 21081302 · DOI · PMC3080922
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.