Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Public Health and Nutrition›Hazardous Waste

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Hazardous Waste

Public Health and Nutrition · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Waste products which threaten life, health, or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed of, or otherwise managed.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,058 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Waste products which threaten life, health, or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed of, or otherwise managed.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Hazardous Wastes; Waste, Hazardous; Wastes, Hazardous.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Waste Products; Hazardous Substances
Narrower topics
Radioactive Waste

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 6,302 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Hazardous Waste” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 639 of them (10.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 2,164 records.

Reviews account for 493 records (7.8%) and meta-analyses for 1. Randomized controlled trials number 4 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,115 records; 2000-2009: 2,164 records; 2010-2019: 1,384 records; 2020 onward: 639 records2,115through 19992,1642000-20091,3842010-20196392020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,115
2000-20092,164
2010-20191,384
2020 onward639
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 7.8 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.1 percentReviews7.8% (493)Meta-analyses0.0% (1)Randomized controlled trials0.1% (4)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 6,302 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4937.8%
Meta-analyses10.0%
Randomized controlled trials40.1%

Method: PubMed query "Hazardous Waste"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in public health and nutrition

Population and nutrition studies mostly observe what people eat, breathe or are exposed to and then look for links with health, which shows association and not proof of cause. Self-reported diet is imprecise, people who eat or live differently also differ in other ways, and effects measured across a population may not apply to one person. Check the study design, how exposure was measured, what else was accounted for and the size of the effect, not only whether it was statistically significant.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Bio-inspired nano-traps for uranium extraction from seawater and recovery from nuclear waste
Sun Q, Aguila B, Perman J, Ivanov AS, Bryantsev VS, Earl LD, et al.
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
165cc by
PMID 29691403 · DOI · PMC5915388
Advances in phytoremediation
Dietz AC, Schnoor JL
2001Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
106cc by
PMID 11250813 · DOI · PMC1240550
Hazardous waste and health impact: a systematic review of the scientific literature
Fazzo L, Minichilli F, Santoro M, Ceccarini A, Della Seta M, Bianchi F, et al.
2017Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
48cc by
PMID 29020961 · DOI · PMC5637250
Cancer Incidence and Childhood Residence Near the Coldwater Creek Radioactive Waste Site
Leung M, Tang IW, Lin JJY, Mucci L, Farmer JG, McAlaine K, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 40668577 · DOI · PMC12268482

Bio-inspired nano-traps for uranium extraction from seawater and recovery from nuclear waste [1]

Research article Sun Q, Aguila B, Perman J, Ivanov AS, Bryantsev VS, Earl LD, et al. · · 2018 · cited 165 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Nature can efficiently recognize specific ions by exerting second-sphere interactions onto well-folded protein scaffolds.
Closing excerpt
Using a combination of spectroscopic, crystallographic, and theory calculation studies, it is revealed that the amino substituent assists in lowering the charge on uranyl in the complex and serves as a hydrogen bond acceptor, boosting the overall uranyl affinity of amidoxime.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)

Nature can efficiently recognize specific ions by exerting second-sphere interactions onto well-folded protein scaffolds. However, a considerable challenge remains to artificially manipulate such affinity, while being cost-effective in managing immense amounts of water samples. Here, we propose an effective approach to regulate uranyl capture performance by creating bio-inspired nano-traps, illustrated by constructing chelating moieties into porous frameworks, where the binding motif's coordinative interaction towards uranyl is enhanced by introducing an assistant group, reminiscent of biological systems. Representatively, the porous framework bearing 2-aminobenzamidoxime is exceptional in sequestering high uranium concentrations with sufficient capacities (530 mg g-1) and trace quantities, including uranium in real seawater (4.36 mg g-1, triple the benchmark). Using a combination of spectroscopic, crystallographic, and theory calculation studies, it is revealed that the amino substituent assists in lowering the charge on uranyl in the complex and serves as a hydrogen bond acceptor, boosting the overall uranyl affinity of amidoxime.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29691403 · DOI · PMC5915388

Advances in phytoremediation [2]

Review article Dietz AC, Schnoor JL · · 2001 · cited 106 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Phytoremediation is the use of plants to remedy contaminated soils, sediments, and/or groundwater.
Closing excerpt
These could be used in phytoremediation applications if issues of cost and public acceptability are overcome.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (181 words)

Phytoremediation is the use of plants to remedy contaminated soils, sediments, and/or groundwater. Sorption and uptake are governed by physicochemical properties of the compounds, and moderately hydrophobic chemicals (logarithm octanol--water coefficients = 1.0--3.5) are most likely to be bioavailable to rooted, vascular plants. Some hydrophilic compounds, such as methyl-tert-butylether and 1,4-dioxane, may also be taken up by plants via hydrogen bonding with transpiration water. Organic chemicals that pass through membranes and are translocated to stem and leaf tissues may be converted (e.g., oxidized by cytochrome P450s), conjugated by glutathione or amino acids, and compartmentalized in plant tissues as bound residue. The relationship between metabolism of organic xenobiotics and toxicity to plant tissues is not well understood. A series of chlorinated ethenes is more toxic to hybrid poplar trees (Populus deltoides x nigra, DN-34) than are the corresponding chlorinated ethanes. Toxicity correlates best with the number of chlorine atoms in each homologous series. Transgenic plants have been engineered to rapidly detoxify and transform such xenobiotic chemicals. These could be used in phytoremediation applications if issues of cost and public acceptability are overcome.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 11250813 · DOI · PMC1240550

Hazardous waste and health impact: a systematic review of the scientific literature [3]

Systematic review Fazzo L, Minichilli F, Santoro M, Ceccarini A, Della Seta M, Bianchi F, et al. · · 2017 · cited 48 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Waste is part of the agenda of the European Environment and Health Process and included among the topics of the Sixth Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health.
Closing excerpt
International, national and local authorities should oppose and eliminate poor, outdated and illegal practices of waste disposal, including illegal transboundary trade, and increase support regulation and its enforcement.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (348 words)

Waste is part of the agenda of the European Environment and Health Process and included among the topics of the Sixth Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health. Disposal and management of hazardous waste are worldwide challenges. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the evidence of the health impact of hazardous waste exposure, applying transparent and a priori defined methods. The following five steps, based on pre-defined systematic criteria, were applied. 1. Specify the research question, in terms of "Population-Exposure-Comparators-Outcomes" (PECO).Populationpeople living near hazardous waste sites; Exposure: exposure to hazardous waste; Comparators: all comparators; Outcomes: all diseases/health disorders. 2. Carry out the literature search, in Medline and EMBASE. 3. Select studies for inclusion: original epidemiological studies, published between 1999 and 2015, on populations residentially exposed to hazardous waste. 4. Assess the quality of selected studies, taking into account study design, exposure and outcome assessment, confounding control. 5. Rate the confidence in the body of evidence for each outcome taking into account the reliability of each study, the strength of the association and concordance of results.Fifty-seven papers of epidemiological investigations on the health status of populations living near hazardous waste sites were selected for the evidence evaluation. The association between 95 health outcomes (diseases and disorders) and residential exposure to hazardous waste sites was evaluated. Health effects of residential hazardous waste exposure, previously partially unrecognized, were highlighted. Sufficient evidence was found of association between exposure to oil industry waste that releases high concentrations of hydrogen sulphide and acute symptoms. The evidence of causal relationship with hazardous waste was defined as limited for: liver, bladder, breast and testis cancers, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, asthma, congenital anomalies overall and anomalies of the neural tube, urogenital, connective and musculoskeletal systems, low birth weight and pre-term birth; evidence was defined as inadequate for the other health outcomes. The results, although not conclusive, provide indications that more effective public health policies on hazardous waste management are urgently needed. International, national and local authorities should oppose and eliminate poor, outdated and illegal practices of waste disposal, including illegal transboundary trade, and increase support regulation and its enforcement.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29020961 · DOI · PMC5637250

Cancer Incidence and Childhood Residence Near the Coldwater Creek Radioactive Waste Site [4]

Research article Leung M, Tang IW, Lin JJY, Mucci L, Farmer JG, McAlaine K, et al. · · 2025 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ImportanceBeginning in the 1940s, radioactive waste from the effort to develop an atomic bomb was stored in the open near the St Louis, Missouri, airport, and over several decades contaminated nearby Coldwater Creek.
Closing excerpt
Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of baby teeth donors from the Greater St Louis area, evidence suggested a positive association between living near Coldwater Creek in childhood and risk of cancer.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (379 words)

ImportanceBeginning in the 1940s, radioactive waste from the effort to develop an atomic bomb was stored in the open near the St Louis, Missouri, airport, and over several decades contaminated nearby Coldwater Creek.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether living near Coldwater Creek in childhood was associated with self-reported cancer incidence in the St Louis Baby Tooth-Later Life Health Study (SLBT).Design, setting, and participantsThe SLBT cohort study was centered in St Louis and included individuals who donated their baby teeth from 1958 to 1970 to assess exposure to atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Participants for the present analysis were recruited from June 22, 2021, to September 18, 2024.ExposuresResidential proximity to Coldwater Creek (≤1, >1 to 5, >5 to 20, and >20 km) in childhood when participants donated their baby teeth.Main outcomes and measuresSelf-reported cancers, from which several composite outcomes were constructed: any cancer, solid cancers (all except leukemias and lymphomas), known radiosensitive cancers (thyroid, breast, leukemia, and basal cell), and nonradiosensitive cancers (all except thyroid, breast, leukemia, and basal cell). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs between living near Coldwater Creek and several self-reported cancer outcomes were estimated, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and neighborhood median income.ResultsThere were 4209 eligible SLBT participants, of whom 2369 (56.3%) were female. The mean age at enrollment was 63 (range, 55-77) years. The background risk of any form of cancer was 24%. The OR was 1.44 (95% CI, 0.96-2.14) for any form of cancer comparing participants living 1 km or nearer with those living further than 20 km. There was a significant association for radiosensitive cancers (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.21-2.81) but not for nonradiosensitive cancers (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.86-2.30) for participants living 1 km or nearer vs further than 20 km. There was evidence of a dose-response association, where cancer risks were still elevated (albeit smaller) for those living in buffers of greater than 1 to 5 km and greater than 5 to 20 km. Despite imprecision in some of the site-specific estimates, clear signals for some organs, such as the thyroid, were still detected (OR for living ≤1 vs >20 km, 5.00; 95% CI, 1.23-20.32).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of baby teeth donors from the Greater St Louis area, evidence suggested a positive association between living near Coldwater Creek in childhood and risk of cancer.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40668577 · DOI · PMC12268482

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Metal-organic framework-based materials: superior adsorbents for the capture of toxic and radioactive metal ions [5]
    Li J, Wang X, Zhao G, Chen C, Chai Z, Alsaedi A, et al. · Chem Soc Rev · 2018 · cited 595 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: a systematic review [6]
    Grant K, Goldizen FC, Sly PD, Brune MN, Neira M, van den Berg M, et al. · Lancet Glob Health · 2013 · cited 247 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Complex mixture toxicity for single and multiple species: proposed methodologies [7]
    De Zwart D, Posthuma L · Environ Toxicol Chem · 2005 · cited 230 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies [8]
    Khan FI, Husain T, Hejazi R · J Environ Manage · 2004 · cited 221 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: a review of the benefits and potential risks [9]
    Karn B, Kuiken T, Otto M · Environ Health Perspect · 2009 · cited 213 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The use of chelating agents in the remediation of metal-contaminated soils: a review [10]
    Lestan D, Luo CL, Li XD · Environ Pollut · 2008 · cited 187 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Sun Q, Aguila B, Perman J, Ivanov AS, Bryantsev VS, Earl LD, et al.. Bio-inspired nano-traps for uranium extraction from seawater and recovery from nuclear waste. . 2018. PMID 29691403 · DOI · PMC5915388
  2. Dietz AC, Schnoor JL. Advances in phytoremediation. . 2001. PMID 11250813 · DOI · PMC1240550
  3. Fazzo L, Minichilli F, Santoro M, Ceccarini A, Della Seta M, Bianchi F, et al.. Hazardous waste and health impact: a systematic review of the scientific literature. . 2017. PMID 29020961 · DOI · PMC5637250
  4. Leung M, Tang IW, Lin JJY, Mucci L, Farmer JG, McAlaine K, et al.. Cancer Incidence and Childhood Residence Near the Coldwater Creek Radioactive Waste Site. . 2025. PMID 40668577 · DOI · PMC12268482
  5. Li J, Wang X, Zhao G, Chen C, Chai Z, Alsaedi A, et al.. Metal-organic framework-based materials: superior adsorbents for the capture of toxic and radioactive metal ions. Chem Soc Rev. 2018. PMID 29498381 · DOI
  6. Grant K, Goldizen FC, Sly PD, Brune MN, Neira M, van den Berg M, et al.. Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health. 2013. PMID 25104600 · DOI
  7. De Zwart D, Posthuma L. Complex mixture toxicity for single and multiple species: proposed methodologies. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005. PMID 16268170 · DOI
  8. Khan FI, Husain T, Hejazi R. An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies. J Environ Manage. 2004. PMID 15135946 · DOI
  9. Karn B, Kuiken T, Otto M. Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: a review of the benefits and potential risks. Environ Health Perspect. 2009. PMID 20049198 · DOI · PMC2799454
  10. Lestan D, Luo CL, Li XD. The use of chelating agents in the remediation of metal-contaminated soils: a review. Environ Pollut. 2008. PMID 18155817 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Radioactive WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Solid WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Medical WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Electronic WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Waste ProductsPublic Health and Nutrition
  • Air PollutionPublic Health and Nutrition

All 114 articles in Public Health and Nutrition →

At a glance

6,302
PubMed records on this heading
10%
published since 2020
493
review articles
4
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Radioactive WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Solid WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Medical WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Electronic WastePublic Health and Nutrition
  • Waste ProductsPublic Health and Nutrition

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support