Foot Orthoses

We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) use in improving gait biomechanical parameters such as walking speed, mobility, and kinematics in patients with stroke with gait disturbance. We searched the MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus databases and retrieved studies published until June 2021. Experimental and prospective studies were included that evaluated biomechanics or kinematic parameters with or without AFO in patients with stroke. We analyzed gait biomechanical parameters, including walking speed, mobility, balance, and kinematic variables, in studies involving patients with and without AFO use. The criteria of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions were used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies, and the level of evidence was evaluated using the Research Pyramid model. Funnel plot analysis and Egger's test were performed to confirm publication bias. A total of 19 studies including 434 participants that reported on the immediate or short-term effectiveness of AFO use were included in the analysis. Significant improvements in walking speed (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.50; 95% CI 0.34-0.66; P 2, 0%), cadence (SMD, 0.42; 95% CI 0.22-0.62; P 2, 0%), step length (SMD, 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.63; P = 0.0003; I2, 2%), stride length (SMD, 0.43; 95% CI 0.15-0.71; P = 0.003; I2, 7%), Timed up-and-go test (SMD, - 0.30; 95% CI - 0.54 to - 0.07; P = 0.01; I2, 0%), functional ambulation category (FAC) score (SMD, 1.61; 95% CI 1.19-2.02; P 2, 0%), ankle sagittal plane angle at initial contact (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI 0.34-0.98; P 2, 0%), and knee sagittal plane angle at toe-off (SMD, 0.39; 95% CI 0.04-0.73; P = 0.03; I2, 46%) were observed when the patients wore AFOs. Stride time, body sway, and hip sagittal plane angle at toe-off were not significantly improved (p = 0.74, p = 0.07, p = 0.07, respectively). Among these results, the FAC score showed the most significant improvement, and stride time showed the lowest improvement. AFO improves walking speed, cadence, step length, and stride length, particularly in patients with stroke. AFO is considered beneficial in enhancing gait stability and ambulatory ability.

BackgroundAnkle-foot orthoses (AFO) are prescribed to manage difficulty walking due to foot drop, bony foot deformities and poor balance. Traditional AFOs are handmade using thermoplastic vacuum forming which provides limited design options, is labour-intensive and associated with long wait times. 3D printing has the potential to transform AFO production and health service delivery. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering customised 3D printed AFOs by evaluating the biomechanical outcomes, mechanical properties and fit of 3D printed compared to traditionally manufactured AFOs.MethodElectronic databases were searched from January 1985 to June 2018 according to terms related to 3D printing and AFOs. Studies of any design from healthy or pathological populations of any age were eligible for inclusion. Studies must have investigated the effect of customised 3D printed AFOs using any 3D printing technique on outcomes related to walking ability, biomechanical function, mechanical properties, patient comfort, pain and disability. Any other orthotic type or AFOs without a 3D printed calf and foot section were excluded. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE process.ResultsEleven studies met the eligibility criteria evaluating 3D printed AFOs in healthy adults, and adults and children with unilateral foot drop from a variety of conditions. 3D printing was used to replicate traditional AFOs and develop novel designs to optimise the stiffness properties or reduce the weight and improve the ease of use of the AFO. 3D printed custom AFOs were found to be comparable to traditional custom AFOs and prefabricated AFOs in terms of temporal-spatial parameters. The mechanical stiffness and energy dissipation of 3D printed AFOs were found to be similar to prefabricated carbon-fibre AFOs. However, the sample sizes were small (n = 1 to 8) and study quality was generally low.ConclusionThe biomechanical effects and mechanical properties of 3D printed AFOs were comparable to traditionally manufactured AFOs. Developing novel AFO designs using 3D printing has many potential benefits including stiffness and weight optimisation to improve biomechanical function and comfort.

The aim of this systematic review was to identify the best footwear and insole design features for offloading the plantar surface of the foot to prevent foot ulceration in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. We searched multiple databases for published and unpublished studies reporting offloading footwear and insoles for people with diabetic neuropathy and nonulcerated feet. Primary outcome was foot ulcer incidence; other outcome measures considered were any standardized kinetic or kinematic measure indicating loading or offloading the plantar foot. Fifty-four studies, including randomized controlled studies, cohort studies, case-series, and a case-controlled and cross-sectional study were included. Three meta-analyses were conducted and random-effects modelling found peak plantar pressure reduction of arch profile (37 kPa (MD, -37.5; 95% CI, -72.29 to -3.61; P P P < .004).The remaining data were presented in a narrative form due to heterogeneity. This review highlights the difficulty in differentiating the effect of different insole and footwear features in offloading the neuropathic diabetic foot. However, arch profiles, metatarsal additions and apertures are effective in reducing plantar pressure. The use of pressure analysis to enhance the effectiveness of the design of footwear and insoles, particularly through modification, is recommended.

Background: Digital ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) workflows depend on accurate lower limb geometry acquisition. Direct 3D scanning on the lower limb may reduce plaster use, but its geometrical agreement with orthotist plaster casting remains insufficiently investigated. Objective: This study compared posterior lower limb surfaces captured by direct 3D scanning with surfaces obtained from orthotist plaster casts digitised using the same scanner. Methods: Seven healthy paediatric participants underwent bilateral direct scanning and bilateral plaster casting, giving 14 limb comparisons. Cast meshes were digitised, trimmed to reduce boundary effect, globally registered to the direct scans, and segmented into posterior foot, ankle, calf and knee proxy regions. Cast-to-scan distances were then calculated. Results: The ankle region showed the greatest residual mismatch, with a weighted mean distance of 3.49 mm (95% CI 3.16-3.81 mm). It also had the highest proportions of vertices exceeding 2 mm (74.8%) and 5 mm (21.2%), and was the highest-error region in 13 of 14 limbs. The knee region had the lowest weighted mean distance (2.28 mm, 95% CI 1.92-2.60 mm) but showed the largest upper-tail spread. Conclusions: These preliminary findings indicate direct scanning and plaster casting did not produce completely interchangeable posterior limb surfaces in this cohort. The ankle was the most consistently discrepant AFO-relevant region, indicating that digital AFO workflows should include local geometric quality control rather than relying only on whole-limb agreement.