Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Psychiatry and Psychology›Language Development

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Language Development

Psychiatry and Psychology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

The gradual expansion in complexity and meaning of symbols and sounds as perceived and interpreted by the individual through a maturational and learning process.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,130 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The gradual expansion in complexity and meaning of symbols and sounds as perceived and interpreted by the individual through a maturational and learning process. Stages in development include babbling, cooing, word imitation with cognition, and use of short sentences.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Development, Language; Language Acquisition; Acquisition, Language.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Child Development
Narrower topics
Child Language; Crying
See also
Speech

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 20,292 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Language Development” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 4,218 of them (20.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 6,670 records.

Reviews account for 1,559 records (7.7%) and meta-analyses for 147. Randomized controlled trials number 788 (3.9%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 5,972 records; 2000-2009: 3,432 records; 2010-2019: 6,670 records; 2020 onward: 4,218 records5,972through 19993,4322000-20096,6702010-20194,2182020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19995,972
2000-20093,432
2010-20196,670
2020 onward4,218
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 7.7 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.9 percentReviews7.7% (1,559)Meta-analyses0.7% (147)Randomized controlled trials3.9% (788)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 20,292 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,5597.7%
Meta-analyses1470.7%
Randomized controlled trials7883.9%

Method: PubMed query "Language Development"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in psychiatry and psychology

Research on mental health and behaviour relies on questionnaires, interviews and rating scales rather than physical measurements, so how a condition was defined and measured shapes every result. Many studies are observational or small, placebo responses can be large, and findings in one group or culture may not carry over to another. Nothing on this page is advice about diagnosis or treatment; anyone worried about their mental health should talk to a qualified clinician. Check how outcomes were measured, who took part and how long they were followed.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Caregivers Use Joint Attention to Support Sign Language Acquisition in Deaf Children
Sander J, Rowland CF, Lieberman AM
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
7cc by
PMID 40437932 · DOI · PMC12120538
Why do babies cry? Exploring the role of the gut microbiota in infantile colic, constipation, and cramps in the KOALA birth cohort study
Barnett D, Thijs C, Mommers M, Endika M, Klostermann C, Schols H, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
6cc by
PMID 40159147 · DOI · PMC11959906
Language, Communicative Participation, and Well-Being in Young Children with (Presumed) Developmental Language Disorder
Duinmeijer I, Peet S, Janssen L, Scheper A, Zwitserlood-Nijenhuis M, Bliekendaal W, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
5cc by
PMID 40265212 · DOI · PMC12015653
Gendered speech development in early childhood: Evidence from a longitudinal study of vowel and consonant acoustics
Wong E, Koeppe K, Cychosz M, Munson B
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 40181680 · DOI · PMC13320588

Caregivers Use Joint Attention to Support Sign Language Acquisition in Deaf Children [1]

Research article Sander J, Rowland CF, Lieberman AM · · 2025 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Children's ability to share attention with another social partner (joint attention) plays an important role in language development.
Closing excerpt
These joint attentional episodes facilitate word learning in sign language, just as they do in spoken language interactions.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (239 words)

Children's ability to share attention with another social partner (joint attention) plays an important role in language development. However, our understanding of the role of joint attention comes mainly from children learning spoken languages, which gives a very narrow, speech-centric impression of the role of joint attention. This study broadens the scope by examining how deaf children learning a sign language achieve joint attention with their caregivers during natural social interaction, and how caregivers provide word learning opportunities. We analyzed naturalistic play sessions of 54 caregiver-child dyads using American Sign Language (ASL), and identified joint attention that surrounded caregivers' labeling of either familiar or novel objects using a comprehensive multimodal coding scheme. We observed that dyads using ASL establish joint attention using linguistic, visual, and tactile cues, and that most naming events took place in the context of a successful joint attention episode. Key characteristics of these joint attention episodes were significantly correlated with the children's expressive vocabulary size, mirroring the patterns observed for spoken language acquisition. We also found that sign familiarity as well as the order of mention of object labels affected the timing of naming events within joint attention. Our results suggest that caregivers using ASL are highly sensitive to their child's visual attention in interactions and modulate joint attention differently when providing familiar versus novel object labels. These joint attentional episodes facilitate word learning in sign language, just as they do in spoken language interactions.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40437932 · DOI · PMC12120538

Why do babies cry? Exploring the role of the gut microbiota in infantile colic, constipation, and cramps in the KOALA birth cohort study [2]

Research article Barnett D, Thijs C, Mommers M, Endika M, Klostermann C, Schols H, et al. · · 2025 · cited 6 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Gastrointestinal symptoms are common during infancy, including infantile colic.
Closing excerpt
However more work is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms, and explore their interplay with other relevant biopsychosocial factors such as maternal mental health.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (249 words)

Gastrointestinal symptoms are common during infancy, including infantile colic. Colic can be loosely defined as prolonged and recurrent crying without obvious cause. The cause indeed remains unclear despite much research. Results on infant nutrition are inconclusive, but prior work has linked maternal mental health to infant crying. Recently, several small studies have described associations between gut microbiota and colic. We used a larger cohort to examine the role of the microbiota in infant gastrointestinal health, while also accounting for other biopsychosocial factors. Using fecal 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data from 1,012 infants in the KOALA birth cohort, we examined associations between the 1-month gut microbiota and parent-reported functional gastrointestinal symptoms throughout infancy, including colic, constipation, and cramps. These analyses were adjusted for biopsychosocial factors that were associated with symptoms in a broader analysis involving 2,665 participants. In 257 infants, we also explored associations between breastmilk human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) and gastrointestinal symptoms. Higher relative abundance of Staphylococcus at one month was associated with less constipation in the first three months of life. Conversely, Ruminococcus gnavus group abundance was associated with more colicky symptoms, particularly between four and seven months. Breastmilk concentrations of the HMOs lacto-N-hexaose (LNH) and lacto-N-neohexaose (LNnH) were associated with less constipation in the first three months. Our results support the conclusion that gut microbiota are relevant in infantile colic and constipation. However more work is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms, and explore their interplay with other relevant biopsychosocial factors such as maternal mental health.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40159147 · DOI · PMC11959906

Language, Communicative Participation, and Well-Being in Young Children with (Presumed) Developmental Language Disorder [3]

Research article Duinmeijer I, Peet S, Janssen L, Scheper A, Zwitserlood-Nijenhuis M, Bliekendaal W, et al. · · 2025 · cited 5 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundChildren with developmental language disorder (DLD) have problems acquiring language, affecting their communicative participation, social-emotional functioning (SEF) and quality of life (QoL).
Closing excerpt
Furthermore, this study underscores the importance of recognizing that early language difficulties can affect well-being.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (491 words)

BackgroundChildren with developmental language disorder (DLD) have problems acquiring language, affecting their communicative participation, social-emotional functioning (SEF) and quality of life (QoL).AimsTo investigate whether communicative participation mediates the relation between language and SEF and QoL.Methods & proceduresIn a longitudinal design, 511 children were recruited via early intervention groups for children with (presumed) DLD. Language and IQ scores were obtained at a mean age of 3;11 (T0). In kindergarten, communicative participation, SEF and QoL were measured via parental questionnaires (T1, mean age 4;8). The relationship between language and SEF and QoL was investigated directly and with communicative participation as a mediating factor using structural equation modelling.Outcomes & resultsExpressive grammar was related to communicative participation, SEF and QoL, while receptive language and expressive vocabulary were not. Children with better expressive grammar at T0 showed better communicative participation at T1. Better communicative participation, in turn, was related to less problems in SEF and higher QoL. We also found an unexpected positive direct relation between expressive grammar and problems in SEF. Post-hoc analyses showed that this was likely to be a suppressor effect, caused by a small subset of children with relatively good expressive grammar and poor communicative participation.Conclusions & implicationsCommunicative participation is a mediator in the relation between language and SEF and QoL. These results underline the importance of addressing communicative participation as a functional measure of language ability both in research and clinical practice.What this paper addsWhat is already known on the subject Children with DLD have problems acquiring language and communication skills. Alongside and related to these challenges, many children with DLD experience greater problems in SEF and lower levels of QoL, although there is considerable variation among children. Previous research has demonstrated that structural language abilities only explain a small part of the variance in well-being, and more functional language measures, such as pragmatic skills, play an important role. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This study investigated whether the relation between language problems and well-being is mediated by children's ability to participate in communication (communicative participation). Structural equation modelling in a large, longitudinal sample of children with (presumed) DLD showed that communicative participation mediates the relationship between language abilities and both SEF and QoL. Better expressive grammatical skills were associated with better communicative participation, which in turn was related to higher SEF and QoL scores. Thus, the relation between language and well-being is mediated by how effectively children can communicate in daily life. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? For clinicians, this study underlines the importance of addressing communicative participation as a functional measure of language ability. Measuring communicative participation can aid in identifying a child's specific needs and determining the most suitable setting for providing support. Measuring communicative participation can also assist clinicians in setting treatment goals, evaluating intervention effects, and providing advice to parents and schools. Furthermore, this study underscores the importance of recognizing that early language difficulties can affect well-being.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40265212 · DOI · PMC12015653

Gendered speech development in early childhood: Evidence from a longitudinal study of vowel and consonant acoustics [4]

Research article Wong E, Koeppe K, Cychosz M, Munson B · · 2026 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Adults rate the speech of children assigned male at birth (AMAB) and assigned female at birth (AFAB) as young as 2.
Closing excerpt
We interpret this as evidence that children manipulate their speech apparatus volitionally to mark gender through speech.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (151 words)

Adults rate the speech of children assigned male at birth (AMAB) and assigned female at birth (AFAB) as young as 2.5 years of age differently on a scale of definitely a boy to definitely a girl (Munson et al., 2022), despite the lack of consistent sex dimorphism in children's speech production mechanisms. This study used longitudinal data to examine the acoustic differences between AMAB and AFAB children and the association between the acoustic measures and perceived gender ratings of children's speech. We found differences between AMAB and AFAB children in two acoustic parameters that mark gender in adult speech: the spectral centroid of /s/ and the overall scaling of resonant frequencies in vowels. These results demonstrate that children as young as 3 years old speak in ways that reflect their sex assigned at birth. We interpret this as evidence that children manipulate their speech apparatus volitionally to mark gender through speech.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40181680 · DOI · PMC13320588

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function [5]
    Friederici AD · Physiol Rev · 2011 · cited 1,189 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Language and theory of mind: meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding [6]
    Milligan K, Astington JW, Dack LA · Child Dev · 2007 · cited 414 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Contemporary model of language organization: an overview for neurosurgeons [7]
    Chang EF, Raygor KP, Berger MS · J Neurosurg · 2015 · cited 290 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Language abilities in children who were very preterm and/or very low birth weight: a meta-analysis [8]
    Barre N, Morgan A, Doyle LW, Anderson PJ · J Pediatr · 2011 · cited 255 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Associations Between Screen Use and Child Language Skills: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [9]
    Madigan S, McArthur BA, Anhorn C, Eirich R, Christakis DA · JAMA Pediatr · 2020 · cited 227 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Infant Statistical Learning [10]
    Saffran JR, Kirkham NZ · Annu Rev Psychol · 2018 · cited 226 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Sander J, Rowland CF, Lieberman AM. Caregivers Use Joint Attention to Support Sign Language Acquisition in Deaf Children. . 2025. PMID 40437932 · DOI · PMC12120538
  2. Barnett D, Thijs C, Mommers M, Endika M, Klostermann C, Schols H, et al.. Why do babies cry? Exploring the role of the gut microbiota in infantile colic, constipation, and cramps in the KOALA birth cohort study. . 2025. PMID 40159147 · DOI · PMC11959906
  3. Duinmeijer I, Peet S, Janssen L, Scheper A, Zwitserlood-Nijenhuis M, Bliekendaal W, et al.. Language, Communicative Participation, and Well-Being in Young Children with (Presumed) Developmental Language Disorder. . 2025. PMID 40265212 · DOI · PMC12015653
  4. Wong E, Koeppe K, Cychosz M, Munson B. Gendered speech development in early childhood: Evidence from a longitudinal study of vowel and consonant acoustics. . 2026. PMID 40181680 · DOI · PMC13320588
  5. Friederici AD. The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiol Rev. 2011. PMID 22013214 · DOI
  6. Milligan K, Astington JW, Dack LA. Language and theory of mind: meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Dev. 2007. PMID 17381794 · DOI
  7. Chang EF, Raygor KP, Berger MS. Contemporary model of language organization: an overview for neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg. 2015. PMID 25423277 · DOI
  8. Barre N, Morgan A, Doyle LW, Anderson PJ. Language abilities in children who were very preterm and/or very low birth weight: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr. 2011. PMID 21146182 · DOI
  9. Madigan S, McArthur BA, Anhorn C, Eirich R, Christakis DA. Associations Between Screen Use and Child Language Skills: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2020. PMID 32202633 · DOI · PMC7091394
  10. Saffran JR, Kirkham NZ. Infant Statistical Learning. Annu Rev Psychol. 2018. PMID 28793812 · DOI · PMC5754249

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Growth and DevelopmentAnatomy and Physiology
  • Human DevelopmentAnatomy and Physiology
  • Adolescent DevelopmentAnatomy and Physiology
  • Muscle DevelopmentAnatomy and Physiology
  • Plant DevelopmentAnatomy and Physiology
  • Bone DevelopmentAnatomy and Physiology

All 110 articles in Psychiatry and Psychology →

At a glance

20,292
PubMed records on this heading
21%
published since 2020
1,559
review articles
788
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Growth and DevelopmentAnatomy and Physiology
  • Human DevelopmentAnatomy and Physiology
  • Adolescent DevelopmentAnatomy and Physiology
  • Muscle DevelopmentAnatomy and Physiology
  • Plant DevelopmentAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support