Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Psychiatry and Psychology›Marital Status

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Marital Status

Psychiatry and Psychology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A demographic parameter indicating a person's status with respect to marriage, divorce, widowhood, singleness (single person), etc.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,076 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A demographic parameter indicating a person's status with respect to marriage, divorce, widowhood, singleness (single person), etc.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Status, Marital; Currently Married; Married, Currently; Ever Married.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Family Characteristics
Narrower topics
Divorce; Marriage; Single Person; Widowhood

Related concepts

  • Single Person

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 41,966 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Marital Status” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 4,521 of them (10.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 20,330 records.

Reviews account for 1,559 records (3.7%) and meta-analyses for 165. Randomized controlled trials number 615 (1.5%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 20,330 records; 2000-2009: 7,520 records; 2010-2019: 9,595 records; 2020 onward: 4,521 records20,330through 19997,5202000-20099,5952010-20194,5212020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199920,330
2000-20097,520
2010-20199,595
2020 onward4,521
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 3.7 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.5 percentReviews3.7% (1,559)Meta-analyses0.4% (165)Randomized controlled trials1.5% (615)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 41,966 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,5593.7%
Meta-analyses1650.4%
Randomized controlled trials6151.5%

Method: PubMed query "Marital Status"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in psychiatry and psychology

Research on mental health and behaviour relies on questionnaires, interviews and rating scales rather than physical measurements, so how a condition was defined and measured shapes every result. Many studies are observational or small, placebo responses can be large, and findings in one group or culture may not carry over to another. Nothing on this page is advice about diagnosis or treatment; anyone worried about their mental health should talk to a qualified clinician. Check how outcomes were measured, who took part and how long they were followed.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Marital status and risk of dementia over 18 years: Surprising findings from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center
Karakose S, Luchetti M, Stephan Y, Sutin AR, Terracciano A
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
15cc by
PMID 40110684 · DOI · PMC11923573
RETRACTED: Exploring determinants of early marriage among women in Bangladesh: A multilevel analysis
Rashid MM, Siddiqi MNA, Al-Amin M, Rahman MM, Roy TK, Rahman M, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
7cc by
PMID 39475908 · DOI · PMC11524466
Understanding indirect assortative mating and its intergenerational consequences for educational attainment
Sunde HF, Eilertsen EM, Torvik FA
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
5cc by
PMID 40481017 · DOI · PMC12144155
Mindfulness Matters: Untangling Entrapment and Mental Well-Being in Married Couples
Akyıl Y, Erdinç B, Satıcı SA
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 40498367 · DOI · PMC13518484

Marital status and risk of dementia over 18 years: Surprising findings from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center [1]

Research article Karakose S, Luchetti M, Stephan Y, Sutin AR, Terracciano A · · 2025 · cited 15 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
IntroductionMarital status is a potential risk/protective factor for adverse health outcomes.
Closing excerpt
However, stratified analyses showed small differences between groups, and most interactions were not significant, suggesting that the role of marital status in dementia tends to be similar across individuals at different levels of dementia risk due to education, depression, and genetic vulnerability.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (292 words)

IntroductionMarital status is a potential risk/protective factor for adverse health outcomes. This study tested whether marital status was associated with dementia risk in older adults.MethodsParticipants (N = 24,107; Meanage = 71.79) were from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. Cox regressions tested the association between baseline marital status and clinically ascertained dementia over up to 18 years of follow-up.ResultsCompared to married participants, widowed (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.67-0.79), divorced (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.59-0.73), and never-married participants (HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.52-0.71) were at lower dementia risk, including for Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia. The associations for divorced and never married remained significant accounting for demographic, behavioral, clinical, genetic, referral source, participation, and diagnostic factors. The associations were slightly stronger among professional referrals, males, and relatively younger participants.DiscussionUnmarried individuals may have a lower risk of dementia compared to married adults. The findings could indicate delayed diagnoses among unmarried individuals or challenge the assumption that marriage protects against dementia.HighlightsWidowed, divorced, and never-married older adults had a lower dementia risk, compared to their married counterparts. Unmarried older adults were also at a lower risk of Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia, with a pattern of mixed findings for frontotemporal lobar degeneration, and no associations with risk of vascular dementia or mild cognitive impairment. All unmarried groups were at a lower risk of progression from mild cognitive impairment to dementia. There was some evidence of moderation by age, sex, and referral source. However, stratified analyses showed small differences between groups, and most interactions were not significant, suggesting that the role of marital status in dementia tends to be similar across individuals at different levels of dementia risk due to education, depression, and genetic vulnerability.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40110684 · DOI · PMC11923573

RETRACTED: Exploring determinants of early marriage among women in Bangladesh: A multilevel analysis [2]

Research article Rashid MM, Siddiqi MNA, Al-Amin M, Rahman MM, Roy TK, Rahman M, et al. · · 2024 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
IntroductionEarly marriage, defined as marriage under the age of 18, is widely recognized as a human rights violation with deleterious consequences on women's health and well-being.
Closing excerpt
These efforts could potentially alter socio-cultural practices and reduce early marriage in Bangladesh.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (446 words)

IntroductionEarly marriage, defined as marriage under the age of 18, is widely recognized as a human rights violation with deleterious consequences on women's health and well-being. It persists as a significant global public health issue, predominantly being practiced in South Asian countries. In Countries like Bangladesh, this practice contributes to an increase in early pregnancies among women of reproductive age, further exacerbating adverse maternal and child health outcomes. While certain predictors of early marriage are recognized, additional investigation is warranted due to diverse socio-economic and demographic circumstances. This study, therefore, aimed to identify the prevalence and determinants of early marriage among women in Bangladesh.MethodsThis study included a total weighted sample of 18,228 married women aged 18 to 49 years, extracted from the most recent nationally representative Bangladesh Demography and Health Survey (2017-18). We estimated the survey weighted pooled prevalence of early marriage among women and stratified by their different characteristics. We used multilevel mixed-effect binary logistic regression model and estimated the odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to identify the individual-, household-, and community-level factors associated with early marriage practice. All analyses were performed by Stata software version 18.ResultsOverall, 74.27% [95% CI: 73.15, 75.35] women got married before reaching the age of 18 years. Early marriage was more prevalent in Rajshahi (82.69%), Rangpur (81.35%), and Khulna division (79.32%). Women with higher education (OR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.12), husband's higher education (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.67), and non-Muslim women (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.52) were associated with a lower likelihood of experiencing early marriage. Compared to those household heads aged ≤35 years, the likelihood of early marriage among women was lower for those household heads aged 36-55 years (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.93) and >55 years (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69-0.88). Women aged 18-24 years (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.40), husbands with agricultural occupation (OR = 1.22, 95% CI:1.06, 1.41), middle wealth index level (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.28), family size five or more (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.31), and rural residence (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.30) were more likely to experience early marriage.ConclusionThis study underscores the alarming prevalence of early marriage among women in Bangladesh, with three-fourths experiencing early marriage, particularly in specific regions. Notably, women education and older household heads were significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of early marriage. Our findings suggest that culturally sensitive interventions should focus on empowering older household heads, alongside initiatives to increase awareness among younger household heads, and enhance education, particularly in rural and impoverished households. These efforts could potentially alter socio-cultural practices and reduce early marriage in Bangladesh.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39475908 · DOI · PMC11524466

Understanding indirect assortative mating and its intergenerational consequences for educational attainment [3]

Research article Sunde HF, Eilertsen EM, Torvik FA · · 2025 · cited 5 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
We develop a framework for understanding indirect assortative mating and provide updated definitions of key terms.
Closing excerpt
Alternative models that assumed direct assortment estimated environmental transmission to be lower, but these did not fit the data well.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)

We develop a framework for understanding indirect assortative mating and provide updated definitions of key terms. We then develop family models that use partners of twins and siblings to freely estimate the degree of genetic and social homogamy, and account for it when investigating sources of parent-offspring similarity. We applied the models to educational attainment using 1,545,444 individuals in 212,070 extended families in the Norwegian population and Norwegian Twin Registry. Partner similarity in education was better explained by indirect assortment than direct assortment on observed educational attainment, with social homogamy being particularly important. The implied genotypic partner correlation (r = 0.34) was comparable to earlier studies, and higher than expected under direct assortment. About 38% of the parent-offspring correlation (r = 0.34) was attributable to various forms of environmental transmission. Alternative models that assumed direct assortment estimated environmental transmission to be lower, but these did not fit the data well.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40481017 · DOI · PMC12144155

Mindfulness Matters: Untangling Entrapment and Mental Well-Being in Married Couples [4]

Research article Akyıl Y, Erdinç B, Satıcı SA · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Individual experiences can influence the mental health of married couples.
Closing excerpt
Consequently, it is anticipated that the well-being of both spouses will be enhanced if the mindfulness levels of individuals experiencing entrapment are high.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (188 words)

Individual experiences can influence the mental health of married couples. The objective of the present study is to investigate the mediating role of mindfulness in marriage between entrapment and mental well-being by examining the relationships between actors and partners. The actor-partner interdependence mediation model was employed to apply a dyadic approach to the data collected from 423 (N = 846) married couples for this purpose. The mean age of the women was 35.80 (SD = 9.57), while the mean age of the men was 39.0 (SD = 10.46). The results indicated that the relationships between entrapment, mindfulness, and mental well-being were substantial for both genders. It was discovered that the entrapment experienced by each of the couples predicted their own well-being through the mindfulness of the other in marriage in the context of partner effects. In other words, women's entrapment predicted their mental well-being, which in turn predicted men's mindfulness in marriage. Similarly, the mindfulness of women in marriage predicts the mental well-being of men. Consequently, it is anticipated that the well-being of both spouses will be enhanced if the mindfulness levels of individuals experiencing entrapment are high.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40498367 · DOI · PMC13518484

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing [5]
    Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, Ross DA, Afifi R, Allen NB, et al. · Lancet · 2016 · cited 2,388 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Marriage and health: his and hers [6]
    Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Newton TL · Psychol Bull · 2001 · cited 1,119 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review [7]
    Robles TF, Slatcher RB, Trombello JM, McGinn MM · Psychol Bull · 2014 · cited 712 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Marital conflict and child adjustment: an emotional security hypothesis [8]
    Davies PT, Cummings EM · Psychol Bull · 1994 · cited 593 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: a meta-analytic review [9]
    Erel O, Burman B · Psychol Bull · 1995 · cited 532 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Parental divorce and the well-being of children: a meta-analysis [10]
    Amato PR, Keith B · Psychol Bull · 1991 · cited 387 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Karakose S, Luchetti M, Stephan Y, Sutin AR, Terracciano A. Marital status and risk of dementia over 18 years: Surprising findings from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. . 2025. PMID 40110684 · DOI · PMC11923573
  2. Rashid MM, Siddiqi MNA, Al-Amin M, Rahman MM, Roy TK, Rahman M, et al.. RETRACTED: Exploring determinants of early marriage among women in Bangladesh: A multilevel analysis. . 2024. PMID 39475908 · DOI · PMC11524466
  3. Sunde HF, Eilertsen EM, Torvik FA. Understanding indirect assortative mating and its intergenerational consequences for educational attainment. . 2025. PMID 40481017 · DOI · PMC12144155
  4. Akyıl Y, Erdinç B, Satıcı SA. Mindfulness Matters: Untangling Entrapment and Mental Well-Being in Married Couples. . 2026. PMID 40498367 · DOI · PMC13518484
  5. Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, Ross DA, Afifi R, Allen NB, et al.. Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet. 2016. PMID 27174304 · DOI · PMC5832967
  6. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Newton TL. Marriage and health: his and hers. Psychol Bull. 2001. PMID 11439708 · DOI
  7. Robles TF, Slatcher RB, Trombello JM, McGinn MM. Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2014. PMID 23527470 · DOI · PMC3872512
  8. Davies PT, Cummings EM. Marital conflict and child adjustment: an emotional security hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1994. PMID 7809306 · DOI
  9. Erel O, Burman B. Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 1995. PMID 7644602 · DOI
  10. Amato PR, Keith B. Parental divorce and the well-being of children: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1991. PMID 1832495 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • SpousesPsychiatry and Psychology
  • ParentsPsychiatry and Psychology
  • SiblingsPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Home EnvironmentPublic Health and Nutrition
  • LonelinessPsychiatry and Psychology
  • ParentingPsychiatry and Psychology

All 110 articles in Psychiatry and Psychology →

At a glance

41,966
PubMed records on this heading
11%
published since 2020
1,559
review articles
615
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • SpousesPsychiatry and Psychology
  • ParentsPsychiatry and Psychology
  • SiblingsPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Home EnvironmentPublic Health and Nutrition
  • LonelinessPsychiatry and Psychology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support