Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Psychiatry and Psychology›Spouses

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Spouses

Psychiatry and Psychology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Married persons, i.e., husbands and wives, or partners.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (748 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Married persons, i.e., husbands and wives, or partners. Domestic partners, or spousal equivalents, are two adults who have chosen to share their lives in an intimate and committed relationship, reside together, and share a mutual obligation of support for the basic necessities of life.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Married Persons; Married Person; Person, Married; Persons, Married; Spouse; Spousal Notification; Notification, Spousal; Husbands.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Family; Persons

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 12,964 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Spouses” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 2,832 of them (21.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 5,284 records.

Reviews account for 568 records (4.4%) and meta-analyses for 67. Randomized controlled trials number 422 (3.3%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,553 records; 2000-2009: 3,295 records; 2010-2019: 5,284 records; 2020 onward: 2,832 records1,553through 19993,2952000-20095,2842010-20192,8322020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,553
2000-20093,295
2010-20195,284
2020 onward2,832
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 4.4 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.3 percentReviews4.4% (568)Meta-analyses0.5% (67)Randomized controlled trials3.3% (422)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 12,964 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews5684.4%
Meta-analyses670.5%
Randomized controlled trials4223.3%

Method: PubMed query "Spouses"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in psychiatry and psychology

Research on mental health and behaviour relies on questionnaires, interviews and rating scales rather than physical measurements, so how a condition was defined and measured shapes every result. Many studies are observational or small, placebo responses can be large, and findings in one group or culture may not carry over to another. Nothing on this page is advice about diagnosis or treatment; anyone worried about their mental health should talk to a qualified clinician. Check how outcomes were measured, who took part and how long they were followed.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Examining the association between functional social support, marital status, and memory: a systematic review
Haghighi P, Oremus M
2023Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
15cc by
PMID 37173618 · DOI · PMC10182629
The Longitudinal Dyadic Associations Between Social Participation and Cognitive Function in Older Chinese Couples
Hou J, Chen T, Yu NX
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
12cc by
PMID 38605680 · DOI · PMC11067812
Qualitative Examination of the Role and Influence of Mothers-in-Law on Young Married Couples' Family Planning in Rural Maharashtra, India
Dixit A, Ghule M, Rao N, Battala M, Begum S, Johns NE, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
12cc by
PMID 36316150 · DOI · PMC9622279
Effect of a Gender-Synchronized Family Planning Intervention on Inequitable Gender Norms in a Cluster Randomized Control Trial Among Husbands of Married Adolescent Girls in Dosso, Niger
Boyce SC, Minnis AM, Deardorff J, McCoy SI, Challa S, Johns NE, et al.
2026Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
5cc by
PMID 40785460 · DOI · PMC13260746

Examining the association between functional social support, marital status, and memory: a systematic review [1]

Systematic review Haghighi P, Oremus M · · 2023 · cited 15 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundFunctional social support (FSS) has been shown to be positively associated with better cognitive function, especially memory, in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
Closing excerpt
Despite theoretical support for examining the impact of marital status or related variables on the association between FSS and memory, published studies explored this issue secondarily to other research questions.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (229 words)

BackgroundFunctional social support (FSS) has been shown to be positively associated with better cognitive function, especially memory, in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. To better understand this complex association, researchers should consider the impact of additional factors that affect both FSS and memory. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to examine whether one such factor, marital status or related variables (e.g., FSS from spouses compared to FSS from relatives or friends), affects (e.g., confounds or modifies) the association between FSS and memory in middle-aged and older adults.MethodsWe searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus from database inception to June 2022. Eligible articles examined the association between FSS and memory, and included marital status or related variables in the analysis. Data were synthesized narratively and reported in accordance with the Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines; risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).ResultsFour articles were included in the narrative synthesis. All four articles had a low risk of bias. Overall findings suggested some positive associations between FSS from a spouse/partner and memory; however, effect sizes were small and similar to other sources of support, including children, relatives, and friends.ConclusionsOur review is the first attempt to synthesize the literature on this topic. Despite theoretical support for examining the impact of marital status or related variables on the association between FSS and memory, published studies explored this issue secondarily to other research questions.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37173618 · DOI · PMC10182629

The Longitudinal Dyadic Associations Between Social Participation and Cognitive Function in Older Chinese Couples [2]

Research article Hou J, Chen T, Yu NX · · 2024 · cited 12 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectivesBased on the "linked lives" tenant of the life course perspective, this longitudinal study aims to examine the actor and partner effects of social participation on cognitive function in older Chinese couples.
Closing excerpt
Moreover, policymakers should build more facilities to encourage older couples to engage in social activities to prevent cognitive decline.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (180 words)

ObjectivesBased on the "linked lives" tenant of the life course perspective, this longitudinal study aims to examine the actor and partner effects of social participation on cognitive function in older Chinese couples.MethodsA total of 1,706 couples aged 60 and older were included in the final analyses. Social participation was measured using 2 questions regarding types of activities and frequency. Cognitive function was measured using a combination of memory, orientation, visuoconstruction, attention, and calculation. The lagged-dependent APIM was used to model the dyadic associations between social participation and cognitive function.ResultsThe time-averaged actor effects of both husbands' and wives' social participation on their own cognitive function were significant (p .05 for all).DiscussionOur findings indicate an asymmetrical pattern of actor-partner interdependence, where husbands' social participation may affect their wives' cognitive function on average, but wives' social participation does not affect their husbands' cognitive function. Clinical practitioners should invite both partners, especially husbands, to participate in social participation interventions to facilitate crossover benefits for wives. Moreover, policymakers should build more facilities to encourage older couples to engage in social activities to prevent cognitive decline.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38605680 · DOI · PMC11067812

Qualitative Examination of the Role and Influence of Mothers-in-Law on Young Married Couples' Family Planning in Rural Maharashtra, India [3]

Research article Dixit A, Ghule M, Rao N, Battala M, Begum S, Johns NE, et al. · · 2022 · cited 12 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Unmet need for family planning (FP) continues to be high in India, especially among young and newly married women.
Closing excerpt
These findings highlight the need for engagement of MILs for FP promotion in rural India and the potential utility of social norms interventions.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (237 words)

Unmet need for family planning (FP) continues to be high in India, especially among young and newly married women. Mothers-in-law (MILs) often exert pressure on couples for fertility and control decision making and behaviors around fertility and FP, yet there is a paucity of literature to understand their perspectives. Ten focus group discussions (FGDs) were carried out with MILs of young married women (aged 18-29 years) participating in a couple-focused FP intervention as a part of a cluster-randomized intervention evaluation trial (the CHARM2 study) in rural Maharashtra, India. FGDs included questions on their roles, attitudes, and decision making around fertility and FP. Audio-recorded data were translated/transcribed into English and analyzed for key themes using a deductive coding method. MILs reported having social norms of early fertility and son preference. They understood that family size norms are lower among daughters-in-law and that spacing can be beneficial but were not supportive of short-term contraceptives, especially before the first child. They preferred female sterilization, opposed abortion, had apprehensions around side effects from contraceptive use, and had misconceptions about the intrauterine device, with particular concerns around its coercive insertion. MILs mostly believed that decision making should be done jointly by a husband and wife, but that as elders, they should be consulted and involved in the decision-making process. These findings highlight the need for engagement of MILs for FP promotion in rural India and the potential utility of social norms interventions.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36316150 · DOI · PMC9622279

Effect of a Gender-Synchronized Family Planning Intervention on Inequitable Gender Norms in a Cluster Randomized Control Trial Among Husbands of Married Adolescent Girls in Dosso, Niger [4]

Randomized controlled trial Boyce SC, Minnis AM, Deardorff J, McCoy SI, Challa S, Johns NE, et al. · · 2026 · cited 5 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Gender inequitable norms have severe consequences for safety and health globally.
Closing excerpt
As a cost-effective, scalable, and transferable intervention, this small group intervention could be valuable for reducing the negative impact of inequitable gender norms in similar settings.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (102 words)

Gender inequitable norms have severe consequences for safety and health globally. Using data from a four-arm cluster randomized control trial of the Reaching Married Adolescents in Niger (RMA) intervention (2016-2019), this study assesses effects on gender norms among husbands of married adolescent girls (n = 1,055). Using an adjusted hierarchical difference-in-differences model, we found assignment to the RMA small groups intervention to be associated with a 0.62 decrease in inequitable gender norms (95% CI: -1.05, -0.18). As a cost-effective, scalable, and transferable intervention, this small group intervention could be valuable for reducing the negative impact of inequitable gender norms in similar settings.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40785460 · DOI · PMC13260746

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults: a meta-analytic comparison [5]
    Pinquart M, Sörensen S · Psychol Aging · 2011 · cited 553 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Depression and anxiety in long-term cancer survivors compared with spouses and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
    Mitchell AJ, Ferguson DW, Gill J, Paul J, Symonds P · Lancet Oncol · 2013 · cited 540 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Distress in couples coping with cancer: a meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects [7]
    Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks HN, Tuinstra J, Coyne JC · Psychol Bull · 2008 · cited 503 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Male involvement and maternal health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Yargawa J, Leonardi-Bee J · J Epidemiol Community Health · 2015 · cited 320 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The co-dependency concept: does it offer a solution for the spouses of alcoholics? [9]
    Miller KJ · J Subst Abuse Treat · 1994 · cited 311 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Lovesick: How Couples' Relationships Influence Health [10]
    Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Wilson SJ · Annu Rev Clin Psychol · 2017 · cited 292 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Haghighi P, Oremus M. Examining the association between functional social support, marital status, and memory: a systematic review. . 2023. PMID 37173618 · DOI · PMC10182629
  2. Hou J, Chen T, Yu NX. The Longitudinal Dyadic Associations Between Social Participation and Cognitive Function in Older Chinese Couples. . 2024. PMID 38605680 · DOI · PMC11067812
  3. Dixit A, Ghule M, Rao N, Battala M, Begum S, Johns NE, et al.. Qualitative Examination of the Role and Influence of Mothers-in-Law on Young Married Couples' Family Planning in Rural Maharashtra, India. . 2022. PMID 36316150 · DOI · PMC9622279
  4. Boyce SC, Minnis AM, Deardorff J, McCoy SI, Challa S, Johns NE, et al.. Effect of a Gender-Synchronized Family Planning Intervention on Inequitable Gender Norms in a Cluster Randomized Control Trial Among Husbands of Married Adolescent Girls in Dosso, Niger. . 2026. PMID 40785460 · DOI · PMC13260746
  5. Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults: a meta-analytic comparison. Psychol Aging. 2011. PMID 21417538 · DOI · PMC4449135
  6. Mitchell AJ, Ferguson DW, Gill J, Paul J, Symonds P. Depression and anxiety in long-term cancer survivors compared with spouses and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013. PMID 23759376 · DOI
  7. Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks HN, Tuinstra J, Coyne JC. Distress in couples coping with cancer: a meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychol Bull. 2008. PMID 18193993 · DOI
  8. Yargawa J, Leonardi-Bee J. Male involvement and maternal health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015. PMID 25700533 · DOI · PMC4453485
  9. Miller KJ. The co-dependency concept: does it offer a solution for the spouses of alcoholics?. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1994. PMID 7966504 · DOI
  10. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Wilson SJ. Lovesick: How Couples' Relationships Influence Health. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017. PMID 28301763 · DOI · PMC5549103

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Marital StatusPsychiatry and Psychology
  • ParentsPsychiatry and Psychology
  • SiblingsPsychiatry and Psychology
  • LonelinessPsychiatry and Psychology
  • ParentingPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Social IsolationPsychiatry and Psychology

All 110 articles in Psychiatry and Psychology →

At a glance

12,964
PubMed records on this heading
22%
published since 2020
568
review articles
422
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Marital StatusPsychiatry and Psychology
  • ParentsPsychiatry and Psychology
  • SiblingsPsychiatry and Psychology
  • LonelinessPsychiatry and Psychology
  • ParentingPsychiatry and Psychology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support