Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Diagnostics and Medical Technology›Narrow Band Imaging

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Narrow Band Imaging

Diagnostics and Medical Technology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Imaging techniques that use illumination created with several optical interference filters by which the frequency ranges are spectrally narrowed and light scatter is greatly reduced.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,022 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Imaging techniques that use illumination created with several optical interference filters by which the frequency ranges are spectrally narrowed and light scatter is greatly reduced. Thus the reflected photons reconstituting the images are from distinct depths (the surface and deeper layers) of the object being imaged.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Band Imaging, Narrow; Band Imagings, Narrow; Imaging, Narrow Band; Imagings, Narrow Band; Narrow Band Imagings; Narrowband Imaging; Imaging, Narrowband; Imagings, Narrowband.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Optical Imaging

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 1,444 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Narrow Band Imaging” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 555 of them (38.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 928 records.

Reviews account for 244 records (16.9%) and meta-analyses for 72. Randomized controlled trials number 101 (7.0%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 2 records; 2010-2019: 928 records; 2020 onward: 555 records0through 199922000-20099282010-20195552020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20092
2010-2019928
2020 onward555
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 16.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 5.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 7.0 percentReviews16.9% (244)Meta-analyses5.0% (72)Randomized controlled trials7.0% (101)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 1,444 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews24416.9%
Meta-analyses725.0%
Randomized controlled trials1017.0%

Method: PubMed query "Narrow Band Imaging"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.

Reading the evidence in diagnostics and medical technology

A test or device is judged by how well it detects a condition, how often it gives false alarms or misses cases, and whether using it improves outcomes for people. Accuracy depends on who is tested and how common the condition is, so a test that performs well in a specialist hospital can perform differently in the community. Check the reference standard, the population studied, the sensitivity and specificity and whether results were confirmed in a separate group.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Convolutional neural network for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer based on magnifying narrow band imaging
Li L, Chen Y, Shen Z, Zhang X, Sang J, Ding Y, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
130cc by
PMID 31332619 · DOI · PMC6942561
Narrow band imaging versus lugol chromoendoscopy to diagnose squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Morita FH, Bernardo WM, Ide E, Rocha RS, Aquino JC, Minata MK, et al.
2017Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
123cc by
PMID 28086818 · DOI · PMC5237308
Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment planning for colorectal polyps using a deep-learning model
Song EM, Park B, Ha CA, Hwang SW, Park SH, Yang DH, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
64cc by
PMID 31913337 · DOI · PMC6949236
Enhancing esophageal cancer detection using a deep learning framework and a novel spectrum-aided vision enhancer for virtual narrow band imaging
Tsai YY, Lee KH, Mukundan A, Karmakar R, Nagisetti Y, Seyoum DG, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42162031 · DOI · PMC13469449

Convolutional neural network for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer based on magnifying narrow band imaging [1]

Research article Li L, Chen Y, Shen Z, Zhang X, Sang J, Ding Y, et al. · · 2020 · cited 130 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundMagnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (M-NBI) has been applied to examine early gastric cancer by observing microvascular architecture and microsurface structure of gastric mucosal lesions.
Closing excerpt
It is anticipated that more progress will be made in optimization of the CNN diagnostic system and further development of artificial intelligence in the medical field.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (241 words)

BackgroundMagnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (M-NBI) has been applied to examine early gastric cancer by observing microvascular architecture and microsurface structure of gastric mucosal lesions. However, the diagnostic efficacy of non-experts in differentiating early gastric cancer from non-cancerous lesions by M-NBI remained far from satisfactory. In this study, we developed a new system based on convolutional neural network (CNN) to analyze gastric mucosal lesions observed by M-NBI.MethodsA total of 386 images of non-cancerous lesions and 1702 images of early gastric cancer were collected to train and establish a CNN model (Inception-v3). Then a total of 341 endoscopic images (171 non-cancerous lesions and 170 early gastric cancer) were selected to evaluate the diagnostic capabilities of CNN and endoscopists. Primary outcome measures included diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CNN system in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer were 91.18%, 90.64%, and 90.91%, respectively. No significant difference was spotted in the specificity and accuracy of diagnosis between CNN and experts. However, the diagnostic sensitivity of CNN was significantly higher than that of the experts. Furthermore, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CNN were significantly higher than those of the non-experts.ConclusionsOur CNN system showed high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. It is anticipated that more progress will be made in optimization of the CNN diagnostic system and further development of artificial intelligence in the medical field.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31332619 · DOI · PMC6942561

Narrow band imaging versus lugol chromoendoscopy to diagnose squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis [2]

Meta-analysis Morita FH, Bernardo WM, Ide E, Rocha RS, Aquino JC, Minata MK, et al. · · 2017 · cited 123 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundIn the early stage esophageal cancer, changes in the mucosa are subtle and pass unnoticed in endoscopic examinations using white light.
Closing excerpt
In the differentiation of those disorders from other esophageal mucosa alterations, the NBI was shown to be superior than Lugol.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (344 words)

BackgroundIn the early stage esophageal cancer, changes in the mucosa are subtle and pass unnoticed in endoscopic examinations using white light. To increase sensitivity, chromoscopy with Lugol's solution has been used. Technological advancements have led to the emergence of virtual methods of endoscopic chromoscopy, including narrow band imaging (NBI). NBI enhances the relief of the mucosa and the underlying vascular pattern, providing greater convenience without the risks inherent to the use of vital dye. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the ability of NBI to diagnose squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and to compare it to chromoscopy with Lugol's solution.MethodsThis systematic review included all studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of NBI and Lugol chromoendoscopy performed to identify high-grade dysplasia and/or squamous cell carcinoma in the esophagus. In the meta-analysis, we calculated and demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood values in forest plots. We also determined summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves and estimates of the areas under the curves for both per-patient and per-lesion analysis.ResultsThe initial search identified 7079 articles. Of these, 18 studies were included in the systematic review and 12 were used in the meta-analysis, for a total of 1911 patients. In per-patient and per-lesion analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood values for Lugol chromoendoscopy were 92% and 98, 82 and 37%, 5.42 and 1.4, and 0.13 and 0.39, respectively, and for NBI were 88 and 94%, 88 and 65%, 8.32 and 2.62, and 0.16 and 0.12, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in only specificity values, in which case NBI was superior to Lugol chromoendoscopy in both analyses. In the per-patient analysis, the area under the sROC curve for Lugol chromoendoscopy was 0.9559. In the case of NBI, this value was 0.9611; in the per-lesion analysis, this number was 0.9685 and 0.9587, respectively.ConclusionsNBI was adequate in evaluating the esophagus in order to diagnose high-grade dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma. In the differentiation of those disorders from other esophageal mucosa alterations, the NBI was shown to be superior than Lugol.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28086818 · DOI · PMC5237308

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment planning for colorectal polyps using a deep-learning model [3]

Research article Song EM, Park B, Ha CA, Hwang SW, Park SH, Yang DH, et al. · · 2020 · cited 64 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
We aimed to develop a computer-aided diagnostic system (CAD) for predicting colorectal polyp histology using deep-learning technology and to validate its performance.
Closing excerpt
CAD using a deep-learning model can accurately assess polyp histology and may facilitate the diagnosis of colorectal polyps by endoscopists.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (257 words)

We aimed to develop a computer-aided diagnostic system (CAD) for predicting colorectal polyp histology using deep-learning technology and to validate its performance. Near-focus narrow-band imaging (NBI) pictures of colorectal polyps were retrieved from the database of our institution. Of these, 12480 image patches of 624 polyps were used as a training set to develop the CAD. The CAD performance was validated with two test datasets of 545 polyps. Polyps were classified into three histological groups: serrated polyp (SP), benign adenoma (BA)/mucosal or superficial submucosal cancer (MSMC), and deep submucosal cancer (DSMC). The overall kappa value measuring the agreement between the true polyp histology and the expected histology by the CAD was 0.614-0.642, which was higher than that of trainees (n = 6, endoscopists with experience of 100 NBI colonoscopies in <6 months; 0.368-0.401) and almost comparable with that of the experts (n = 3, endoscopists with experience of 2,500 NBI colonoscopies in ≥5 years) (0.649-0.735). The areas under the receiver operating curves for CAD were 0.93-0.95, 0.86-0.89, and 0.89-0.91 for SP, BA/MSMC, and DSMC, respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the CAD was 81.3-82.4%, which was significantly higher than that of the trainees (63.8-71.8%, P < 0.01) and comparable with that of experts (82.4-87.3%). The kappa value and diagnostic accuracies of the trainees improved with CAD assistance: that is, the kappa value increased from 0.368 to 0.655, and the overall diagnostic accuracy increased from 63.8-71.8% to 82.7-84.2%. CAD using a deep-learning model can accurately assess polyp histology and may facilitate the diagnosis of colorectal polyps by endoscopists.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31913337 · DOI · PMC6949236

Enhancing esophageal cancer detection using a deep learning framework and a novel spectrum-aided vision enhancer for virtual narrow band imaging [4]

Research article Tsai YY, Lee KH, Mukundan A, Karmakar R, Nagisetti Y, Seyoum DG, et al. · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy where early detection is critical for survival.
Closing excerpt
This study presents a cost-effective, software-driven solution that integrates advanced image processing with deep learning, offering a robust tool for the automated screening of esophageal malignancies.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (180 words)

Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy where early detection is critical for survival. However, early-stage lesions typically present subtle mucosal changes that are difficult to identify using standard White Light Imaging (WLI), and hardware-based Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) is not universally available. In this study, we propose a novel image processing algorithm termed the Spectrum-Aided Vision Enhancer (SAVE) to address these challenges in computer-aided diagnosis (CAD). Leveraging hyperspectral data principles, SAVE transforms standard WLI endoscopic images into enhanced, NBI-like representations, significantly improving mucosal contrast and lesion visibility without requiring additional hardware. To validate the efficacy of this approach for medical image analysis, we utilized a dataset of Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) and dysplasia. We conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis using five state-of-the-art deep learning models: YOLOv8, InceptionV3, Inception-ResNet-V2, ConvNeXt-V2, and MobileNetV2. Experimental results demonstrate that models trained on SAVE-enhanced images significantly outperform those trained on traditional WLI in both classification and detection tasks. This study presents a cost-effective, software-driven solution that integrates advanced image processing with deep learning, offering a robust tool for the automated screening of esophageal malignancies.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42162031 · DOI · PMC13469449

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team [5]
    Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, Saito S, Matsuda T, Wada Y, et al. · Dig Endosc · 2016 · cited 411 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Narrow-Band Imaging for Detection of Neoplasia at Colonoscopy: A Meta-analysis of Data From Individual Patients in Randomized Controlled Trials [6]
    Atkinson NSS, Ket S, Bassett P, Aponte D, De Aguiar S, Gupta N, et al. · Gastroenterology · 2019 · cited 128 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics [7]
    McGill SK, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP, Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T · Gut · 2013 · cited 118 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Present and future status of flexible spectral imaging color enhancement and blue laser imaging technology [8]
    Osawa H, Yamamoto H · Dig Endosc · 2014 · cited 107 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Validation study for development of the Japan NBI Expert Team classification of colorectal lesions [9]
    Iwatate M, Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, Saito S, Matsuda T, et al. · Dig Endosc · 2018 · cited 106 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Narrow band imaging diagnosis of bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis [10]
    Zheng C, Lv Y, Zhong Q, Wang R, Jiang Q · BJU Int · 2012 · cited 101 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Li L, Chen Y, Shen Z, Zhang X, Sang J, Ding Y, et al.. Convolutional neural network for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer based on magnifying narrow band imaging. . 2020. PMID 31332619 · DOI · PMC6942561
  2. Morita FH, Bernardo WM, Ide E, Rocha RS, Aquino JC, Minata MK, et al.. Narrow band imaging versus lugol chromoendoscopy to diagnose squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2017. PMID 28086818 · DOI · PMC5237308
  3. Song EM, Park B, Ha CA, Hwang SW, Park SH, Yang DH, et al.. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment planning for colorectal polyps using a deep-learning model. . 2020. PMID 31913337 · DOI · PMC6949236
  4. Tsai YY, Lee KH, Mukundan A, Karmakar R, Nagisetti Y, Seyoum DG, et al.. Enhancing esophageal cancer detection using a deep learning framework and a novel spectrum-aided vision enhancer for virtual narrow band imaging. . 2026. PMID 42162031 · DOI · PMC13469449
  5. Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, Saito S, Matsuda T, Wada Y, et al.. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc. 2016. PMID 26927367 · DOI
  6. Atkinson NSS, Ket S, Bassett P, Aponte D, De Aguiar S, Gupta N, et al.. Narrow-Band Imaging for Detection of Neoplasia at Colonoscopy: A Meta-analysis of Data From Individual Patients in Randomized Controlled Trials. Gastroenterology. 2019. PMID 30998991 · DOI
  7. McGill SK, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP, Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T. Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics. Gut. 2013. PMID 23300139 · DOI · PMC3841766
  8. Osawa H, Yamamoto H. Present and future status of flexible spectral imaging color enhancement and blue laser imaging technology. Dig Endosc. 2014. PMID 24373002 · DOI
  9. Iwatate M, Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, Saito S, Matsuda T, et al.. Validation study for development of the Japan NBI Expert Team classification of colorectal lesions. Dig Endosc. 2018. PMID 29603399 · DOI
  10. Zheng C, Lv Y, Zhong Q, Wang R, Jiang Q. Narrow band imaging diagnosis of bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2012. PMID 22985502 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Perfusion ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Echo-Planar ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Optical ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Functional NeuroimagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Diagnostic ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Positron-Emission TomographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology

All 110 articles in Diagnostics and Medical Technology →

At a glance

1,444
PubMed records on this heading
38%
published since 2020
244
review articles
101
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-11-04; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Perfusion ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Echo-Planar ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Optical ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Functional NeuroimagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Diagnostic ImagingDiagnostics and Medical Technology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support