Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (817 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Formation of spongy bone in the labyrinth capsule which can progress toward the stapes (stapedial fixation) or anteriorly toward the cochlea leading to conductive, sensorineural, or mixed hearing loss. Several genes are associated with familial otosclerosis with varied clinical signs.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Otoscleroses; Otospongiosis; Otospongioses.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Ear Diseases
- See also
- Fenestration, Labyrinth; Stapes Mobilization
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 5,623 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Otosclerosis” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 408 of them (7.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 3,948 records.
Reviews account for 313 records (5.6%) and meta-analyses for 27. Randomized controlled trials number 40 (0.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 3,948 |
| 2000-2009 | 681 |
| 2010-2019 | 586 |
| 2020 onward | 408 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 313 | 5.6% |
| Meta-analyses | 27 | 0.5% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 40 | 0.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Otosclerosis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.
Reading the evidence in eye, ear, nose and throat
Eye, hearing, nose and throat studies rely on specialist tests (visual acuity, eye pressure, audiograms, scopes) and on patient-reported symptoms, which vary between people and with age. Some conditions improve without treatment, so comparison groups matter. Nothing on this page is advice about diagnosis or treatment; sudden loss of sight or hearing needs urgent care from a qualified clinician. Check how the outcome was tested, the age of the people studied and how long they were followed.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mutations and altered expression of SERPINF1 in patients with familial otosclerosis | 2016 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 29 | cc by PMID 27056980 · DOI · PMC5181625 |
| CHD7 deficiency in "Looper", a new mouse model of CHARGE syndrome, results in ossicle malformation, otosclerosis and hearing impairment | 2014 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 25 | cc by PMID 24840056 · DOI · PMC4026240 |
| Brazilian Society of Otology task force - Otosclerosis: evaluation and treatment | 2023 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 17 | cc by PMID 37647735 · DOI · PMC10474207 |
| Revisions after prior stapes surgery: aspects on indication, intraoperative findings and surgical strategies | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 2 | cc by PMID 39589410 · DOI · PMC11890255 |
Mutations and altered expression of SERPINF1 in patients with familial otosclerosis [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Otosclerosis is a relatively common heterogenous condition, characterized by abnormal bone remodelling in the otic capsule leading to fixation of the stapedial footplate and an associated conductive hearing loss.
- Closing excerpt
- Furthermore, RT-qPCR analysis of stapes bone cDNA showed that SERPINF1-012 expression is reduced in otosclerosis patients with and without SERPINF1 mutations, suggesting that it may be a common pathogenic pathway in the disease.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (249 words)
Otosclerosis is a relatively common heterogenous condition, characterized by abnormal bone remodelling in the otic capsule leading to fixation of the stapedial footplate and an associated conductive hearing loss. Although familial linkage and candidate gene association studies have been performed in recent years, little progress has been made in identifying disease-causing genes. Here, we used whole-exome sequencing in four families exhibiting dominantly inherited otosclerosis to identify 23 candidate variants (reduced to 9 after segregation analysis) for further investigation in a secondary cohort of 84 familial cases. Multiple mutations were found in the SERPINF1 (Serpin Peptidase Inhibitor, Clade F) gene which encodes PEDF (pigment epithelium-derived factor), a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis and known regulator of bone density. Six rare heterozygous SERPINF1 variants were found in seven patients in our familial otosclerosis cohort; three are missense mutations predicted to be deleterious to protein function. The other three variants are all located in the 5'-untranslated region (UTR) of an alternative spliced transcript SERPINF1-012 RNA-seq analysis demonstrated that this is the major SERPINF1 transcript in human stapes bone. Analysis of stapes from two patients with the 5'-UTR mutations showed that they had reduced expression of SERPINF1-012 All three 5'-UTR mutations are predicted to occur within transcription factor binding sites and reporter gene assays confirmed that they affect gene expression levels. Furthermore, RT-qPCR analysis of stapes bone cDNA showed that SERPINF1-012 expression is reduced in otosclerosis patients with and without SERPINF1 mutations, suggesting that it may be a common pathogenic pathway in the disease.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27056980 · DOI · PMC5181625
CHD7 deficiency in "Looper", a new mouse model of CHARGE syndrome, results in ossicle malformation, otosclerosis and hearing impairment [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- CHARGE syndrome is a rare human disorder caused by mutations in the gene encoding chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7 (CHD7).
- Closing excerpt
- Looper mice are hyperactive and have vestibular dysfunction but do not display motor impairment.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (127 words)
CHARGE syndrome is a rare human disorder caused by mutations in the gene encoding chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7 (CHD7). Characteristics of CHARGE are varied and include developmental ear and hearing anomalies. Here we report a novel mouse model of CHD7 dysfunction, termed Looper. The Looper strain harbours a nonsense mutation (c.5690C>A, p.S1897X) within the Chd7 gene. Looper mice exhibit many of the clinical features of the human syndrome, consistent with previously reported CHARGE models, including growth retardation, facial asymmetry, vestibular defects, eye anomalies, hyperactivity, ossicle malformation, hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction. Looper mice display an otosclerosis-like fusion of the stapes footplate to the cochlear oval window and blepharoconjunctivitis but not coloboma. Looper mice are hyperactive and have vestibular dysfunction but do not display motor impairment.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 24840056 · DOI · PMC4026240
Brazilian Society of Otology task force - Otosclerosis: evaluation and treatment [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ObjectivesTo review and provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of otosclerosis.
- Closing excerpt
- Implantable systems should be indicated only in rare cases, and the CI should be indicated in cases of profound deafness.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)
ObjectivesTo review and provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of otosclerosis.MethodsTask force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on otosclerosis were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions.ResultsThe topics were divided into 2 parts: 1) Diagnosis - audiologic and radiologic; 2) Treatment - hearing AIDS, pharmacological therapy, stapes surgery, and implantable devices - bone-anchored devices, active middle ear implants, and Cochlear Implants (CI).ConclusionsThe pathophysiology of otosclerosis has not yet been fully elucidated, but environmental factors and unidentified genes are likely to play a significant role in it. Women with otosclerosis are not at increased risk of worsening clinical condition due to the use of contraceptives or during pregnancy. Drug treatment has shown little benefit. If the patient does not want to undergo stapedotomy, the use of hearing aids is well indicated. Implantable systems should be indicated only in rare cases, and the CI should be indicated in cases of profound deafness.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37647735 · DOI · PMC10474207
Revisions after prior stapes surgery: aspects on indication, intraoperative findings and surgical strategies [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ObjectivePrimary stapes surgery is considered a challenging intervention in ear surgery.
- Closing excerpt
- In addition, there are patterns regarding the chances of success of a revision, especially in cases of persistent conductive hearing loss chances of hearing improvement seem possible in more than 80% of cases.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (242 words)
ObjectivePrimary stapes surgery is considered a challenging intervention in ear surgery. Despite an risk of deafness in 0.5-1 percent, this procedure has still a good benefit-risk ratio due to the improvement in hearing and quality of life that is usually achieved. However, revision after prior stapes surgery is considered even more challenging. Revisions after stapes surgery are very heterogeneous procedures, both in terms of the indication and the surgical strategy and are generally considered to be significantly more demanding. Reasons for complications after prior stapes surgery as well as strategies for successful revisions are not well described in the literature.MethodsRetrospective cohort study, tertiary referral center. 124 cases of revisions after prior stapes surgery were identified between 2011-2022 and are analyzed based on biographic data, clinical, audiological, and intraoperative findings as well as the eventual therapy. Cases were analyzed regarding indication, intraoperative finding and the surgical strategy chosen.ResultsAcute, subacute, and long-term complications of the primary intervention as well as other incidental reasons such as progressive hearing loss can be identified as indication for revision surgery. Preoperative clinical findings were correlated to intraoperative findings and surgical strategies. Audiological results are discussed.ConclusionsDifferent recommendations for the indication of a surgical revision can be derived depending on the individual preoperative case history and findings. In addition, there are patterns regarding the chances of success of a revision, especially in cases of persistent conductive hearing loss chances of hearing improvement seem possible in more than 80% of cases.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39589410 · DOI · PMC11890255
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Pathophysiology of otosclerosis [5]
- Research article Otosclerosis: Temporal Bone Pathology [6]
- Research article The aetiology of otosclerosis: a review of the literature [7]
- Research article Biomechanics of stapesplasty: a review [8]
- Research article The pathophysiology of otosclerosis: Review of current research [9]
- Research article The genetics of otosclerosis: a review [10]
References
- Ziff JL, Crompton M, Powell HR, Lavy JA, Aldren CP, Steel KP, et al.. Mutations and altered expression of SERPINF1 in patients with familial otosclerosis. . 2016. PMID 27056980 · DOI · PMC5181625
- Ogier JM, Carpinelli MR, Arhatari BD, Symons RC, Kile BT, Burt RA. CHD7 deficiency in "Looper", a new mouse model of CHARGE syndrome, results in ossicle malformation, otosclerosis and hearing impairment. . 2014. PMID 24840056 · DOI · PMC4026240
- Silva VAR, Pauna HF, Lavinsky J, Guimarães GC, Abrahão NM, Massuda ET, et al.. Brazilian Society of Otology task force - Otosclerosis: evaluation and treatment. . 2023. PMID 37647735 · DOI · PMC10474207
- Sharaf K, Grueninger I, Alekuzei S, Polterauer D, Schreier A, Canis M, et al.. Revisions after prior stapes surgery: aspects on indication, intraoperative findings and surgical strategies. . 2025. PMID 39589410 · DOI · PMC11890255
- Chole RA, McKenna M. Pathophysiology of otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol. 2001. PMID 11300278 · DOI
- Quesnel AM, Ishai R, McKenna MJ. Otosclerosis: Temporal Bone Pathology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018. PMID 29397947 · DOI
- Menger DJ, Tange RA. The aetiology of otosclerosis: a review of the literature. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003. PMID 12680829 · DOI
- Hüttenbrink KB. Biomechanics of stapesplasty: a review. Otol Neurotol. 2003. PMID 12851544 · DOI
- Rudic M, Keogh I, Wagner R, Wilkinson E, Kiros N, Ferrary E, et al.. The pathophysiology of otosclerosis: Review of current research. Hear Res. 2015. PMID 26276418 · DOI
- Gordon MA. The genetics of otosclerosis: a review. Am J Otol. 1989. PMID 2692453 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.