Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Diagnostics and Medical Technology›Wheelchairs

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Wheelchairs

Diagnostics and Medical Technology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Chairs or seating mounted on wheels and designed to be controlled or propelled by the occupant.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (728 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Chairs or seating mounted on wheels and designed to be controlled or propelled by the occupant. Medicare Part B (Medical Insurance) covers power-operated vehicles (scooters), walkers, and wheelchairs as durable medical equipment.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Wheelchair; Wheel Chairs; Chairs, Wheel; Chair, Wheel; Wheel Chair.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Self-Help Devices
Narrower topics
Motorized Mobility Scooter

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 6,111 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Wheelchairs” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 1,402 of them (22.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 1,959 records.

Reviews account for 373 records (6.1%) and meta-analyses for 11. Randomized controlled trials number 221 (3.6%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,540 records; 2000-2009: 1,210 records; 2010-2019: 1,959 records; 2020 onward: 1,402 records1,540through 19991,2102000-20091,9592010-20191,4022020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,540
2000-20091,210
2010-20191,959
2020 onward1,402
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 6.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.6 percentReviews6.1% (373)Meta-analyses0.2% (11)Randomized controlled trials3.6% (221)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 6,111 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3736.1%
Meta-analyses110.2%
Randomized controlled trials2213.6%

Method: PubMed query "Wheelchairs"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.

Reading the evidence in diagnostics and medical technology

A test or device is judged by how well it detects a condition, how often it gives false alarms or misses cases, and whether using it improves outcomes for people. Accuracy depends on who is tested and how common the condition is, so a test that performs well in a specialist hospital can perform differently in the community. Check the reference standard, the population studied, the sensitivity and specificity and whether results were confirmed in a separate group.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Motor-Imagery EEG-Based BCIs in Wheelchair Movement and Control: A Systematic Literature Review
Palumbo A, Gramigna V, Calabrese B, Ielpo N
2021Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
43cc by
PMID 34577493 · DOI · PMC8473300
"When They See a Wheelchair, They've Not Even Seen Me"-Factors Shaping the Experience of Disability Stigma and Discrimination in Kenya
Barbareschi G, Carew MT, Johnson EA, Kopi N, Holloway C
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
32cc by
PMID 33920601 · DOI · PMC8073617
Wearable Wheelchair Mobility Performance Measurement in Basketball, Rugby, and Tennis: Lessons for Classification and Training
van der Slikke RMA, Berger MAM, Bregman DJJ, Veeger DHEJ
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
26cc by
PMID 32575915 · DOI · PMC7349814
Analysis of the kinematic pattern of free throw by wheelchair basketball athletes: a systematic review
de Oliveira Silva HV, de Sá KSG, Gorla JI, Costa E Silva AA, Bertoncello D
2025Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 39913631 · DOI · PMC11801695

Motor-Imagery EEG-Based BCIs in Wheelchair Movement and Control: A Systematic Literature Review [1]

Systematic review Palumbo A, Gramigna V, Calabrese B, Ielpo N · · 2021 · cited 43 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The pandemic emergency of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) shed light on the need for innovative aids, devices, and assistive technologies to enable people with severe disabilities to live their daily lives.
Closing excerpt
The results provided in this paper could highlight the limitations of current biomedical instrumentations applied to people with severe disabilities and bring focus to innovative research topics.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (139 words)

The pandemic emergency of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) shed light on the need for innovative aids, devices, and assistive technologies to enable people with severe disabilities to live their daily lives. EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) can lead individuals with significant health challenges to improve their independence, facilitate participation in activities, thus enhancing overall well-being and preventing impairments. This systematic review provides state-of-the-art applications of EEG-based BCIs, particularly those using motor-imagery (MI) data, to wheelchair control and movement. It presents a thorough examination of the different studies conducted since 2010, focusing on the algorithm analysis, features extraction, features selection, and classification techniques used as well as on wheelchair components and performance evaluation. The results provided in this paper could highlight the limitations of current biomedical instrumentations applied to people with severe disabilities and bring focus to innovative research topics.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34577493 · DOI · PMC8473300

"When They See a Wheelchair, They've Not Even Seen Me"-Factors Shaping the Experience of Disability Stigma and Discrimination in Kenya [2]

Research article Barbareschi G, Carew MT, Johnson EA, Kopi N, Holloway C · · 2021 · cited 32 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Disability stigma in many low- and middle-income countries represents one of the most pervasive barriers preventing people with disabilities from accessing equal rights and opportunities, including the uptake of available assistive technology (AT).
Closing excerpt
However, whereas participants without disabilities saw assistive technology purely as an enabler to overcome stigma, participants with disabilities also noted that, in some cases, use of assistive technologies would attract stigma from others.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (201 words)

Disability stigma in many low- and middle-income countries represents one of the most pervasive barriers preventing people with disabilities from accessing equal rights and opportunities, including the uptake of available assistive technology (AT). Previous studies have rarely examined how disability stigma may be shaped through factors endemic to social interactions, including how the use of assistive technology itself may precipitate or alleviate disability stigma. Through two strands of work, we address this gap. Via a series of focus groups with Kenyans without disabilities (Study 1) and secondary data analysis of consultations with Kenyans with disabilities and their allies (Study 2), we identify shared and divergent understandings of what shapes disability stigma and discrimination. Specifically, Kenyans with and without disabilities were cognizant of how religious/spiritual interpretations of disability, conceptions of impairments as "different" from the norm, and social stereotypes about (dis)ability shaped the experience of stigma and discrimination. Moreover, both groups highlighted assistive technology as an influential factor that served to identify or "mark" someone as having a disability. However, whereas participants without disabilities saw assistive technology purely as an enabler to overcome stigma, participants with disabilities also noted that, in some cases, use of assistive technologies would attract stigma from others.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33920601 · DOI · PMC8073617

Wearable Wheelchair Mobility Performance Measurement in Basketball, Rugby, and Tennis: Lessons for Classification and Training [3]

Research article van der Slikke RMA, Berger MAM, Bregman DJJ, Veeger DHEJ · · 2020 · cited 26 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Athlete impairment level is an important factor in wheelchair mobility performance (WMP) in sports.
Closing excerpt
Wearable technology use seems a prerequisite for further development of wheelchair sports, on the sports level (classification) and on individual level (training and wheelchair configuration).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (204 words)

Athlete impairment level is an important factor in wheelchair mobility performance (WMP) in sports. Classification systems, aimed to compensate impairment level effects on performance, vary between sports. Improved understanding of resemblances and differences in WMP between sports could aid in optimizing the classification methodology. Furthermore, increased performance insight could be applied in training and wheelchair optimization. The wearable sensor-based wheelchair mobility performance monitor (WMPM) was used to measure WMP of wheelchair basketball, rugby and tennis athletes of (inter-)national level during match-play. As hypothesized, wheelchair basketball athletes show the highest average WMP levels and wheelchair rugby the lowest, whereas wheelchair tennis athletes range in between for most outcomes. Based on WMP profiles, wheelchair basketball requires the highest performance intensity, whereas in wheelchair tennis, maneuverability is the key performance factor. In wheelchair rugby, WMP levels show the highest variation comparable to the high variation in athletes' impairment levels. These insights could be used to direct classification and training guidelines, with more emphasis on intensity for wheelchair basketball, focus on maneuverability for wheelchair tennis and impairment-level based training programs for wheelchair rugby. Wearable technology use seems a prerequisite for further development of wheelchair sports, on the sports level (classification) and on individual level (training and wheelchair configuration).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32575915 · DOI · PMC7349814

Analysis of the kinematic pattern of free throw by wheelchair basketball athletes: a systematic review [4]

Systematic review de Oliveira Silva HV, de Sá KSG, Gorla JI, Costa E Silva AA, Bertoncello D · · 2025 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Athletes are stratified into classes that range from 1.
Closing excerpt
Further studies are necessary to explore the associated patterns for each FC.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (184 words)

Athletes are stratified into classes that range from 1.0 to 4.5 points subdivided at intervals of 0.5 points in the Wheelchair Basketball (WCB) modality. The discussion regarding the non-utilization of quantitative data based on functional classification (FC) in WCB has become considerably important for research due to its impact on athletes' careers. The aim of this systematic review was to verify the kinematic patterns of the free throw performed by WCB athletes of distinct FC. After researching four online databases, only 7 out of 68 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. High-class players (classes 3.0 - 4.5) presented a throw pattern, with a greater angle on the shoulder joint, on the angular speed of the wrist, and the height of the ball throw; low-class athletes (classes 1.0 - 2.5) exhibited a pushing pattern, with greater speed and throw angles, greater angular speed at the shoulder and elbow joints. Thus, inter-individual differences allow for the stratification of players into distinct classes and serve as relevant tools for increasing accuracy and performance despite different disabilities. Further studies are necessary to explore the associated patterns for each FC.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39913631 · DOI · PMC11801695

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: implications for wheelchair sports [5]
    Vanlandewijck Y, Theisen D, Daly D · Sports Med · 2001 · cited 117 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Physiology of wheelchair racing in athletes with spinal cord injury [6]
    Bhambhani Y · Sports Med · 2002 · cited 95 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Pushrim biomechanics and injury prevention in spinal cord injury: recommendations based on CULP-SCI investigations [7]
    Boninger ML, Koontz AM, Sisto SA, Dyson-Hudson TA, Chang M, Price R, et al. · J Rehabil Res Dev · 2005 · cited 92 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Systematic review of power mobility outcomes for infants, children and adolescents with mobility limitations [8]
    Livingstone R, Field D · Clin Rehabil · 2014 · cited 82 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Manual wheelchairs: Research and innovation in rehabilitation, sports, daily life and health [9]
    van der Woude LH, de Groot S, Janssen TW · Med Eng Phys · 2006 · cited 78 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Effectiveness of the Wheelchair Skills Training Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis [10]
    Keeler L, Kirby RL, Parker K, McLean KD, Hayden JA · Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol · 2019 · cited 73 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Palumbo A, Gramigna V, Calabrese B, Ielpo N. Motor-Imagery EEG-Based BCIs in Wheelchair Movement and Control: A Systematic Literature Review. . 2021. PMID 34577493 · DOI · PMC8473300
  2. Barbareschi G, Carew MT, Johnson EA, Kopi N, Holloway C. "When They See a Wheelchair, They've Not Even Seen Me"-Factors Shaping the Experience of Disability Stigma and Discrimination in Kenya. . 2021. PMID 33920601 · DOI · PMC8073617
  3. van der Slikke RMA, Berger MAM, Bregman DJJ, Veeger DHEJ. Wearable Wheelchair Mobility Performance Measurement in Basketball, Rugby, and Tennis: Lessons for Classification and Training. . 2020. PMID 32575915 · DOI · PMC7349814
  4. de Oliveira Silva HV, de Sá KSG, Gorla JI, Costa E Silva AA, Bertoncello D. Analysis of the kinematic pattern of free throw by wheelchair basketball athletes: a systematic review. . 2025. PMID 39913631 · DOI · PMC11801695
  5. Vanlandewijck Y, Theisen D, Daly D. Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: implications for wheelchair sports. Sports Med. 2001. PMID 11347685 · DOI
  6. Bhambhani Y. Physiology of wheelchair racing in athletes with spinal cord injury. Sports Med. 2002. PMID 11772160 · DOI
  7. Boninger ML, Koontz AM, Sisto SA, Dyson-Hudson TA, Chang M, Price R, et al.. Pushrim biomechanics and injury prevention in spinal cord injury: recommendations based on CULP-SCI investigations. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005. PMID 16195959 · DOI
  8. Livingstone R, Field D. Systematic review of power mobility outcomes for infants, children and adolescents with mobility limitations. Clin Rehabil. 2014. PMID 24764156 · DOI
  9. van der Woude LH, de Groot S, Janssen TW. Manual wheelchairs: Research and innovation in rehabilitation, sports, daily life and health. Med Eng Phys. 2006. PMID 16504565 · DOI
  10. Keeler L, Kirby RL, Parker K, McLean KD, Hayden JA. Effectiveness of the Wheelchair Skills Training Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019. PMID 29616832 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • AortographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • AutoradiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • BedsDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • BioprosthesisDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • BioreactorsDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • Blood Urea NitrogenDiagnostics and Medical Technology

All 110 articles in Diagnostics and Medical Technology →

At a glance

6,111
PubMed records on this heading
23%
published since 2020
373
review articles
221
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-11-04; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • AortographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • AutoradiographyDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • BedsDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • BioprosthesisDiagnostics and Medical Technology
  • BioreactorsDiagnostics and Medical Technology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support