Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for patients undergoing surgical evacuation of an acute subdural hematoma: RESCUE-ASDH RCT and cost effectiveness›References

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for patients undergoing surgical evacuation of an acute subdural hematoma: RESCUE-ASDH RCT and cost effectiveness · References

References

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 6 min read

  1. Kolias AG, Belli A, Li LM, Timofeev I, Corteen EA, Santarius T, et al. Primary decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural haematomas: results of an international survey. Acta Neurochir 2012;154:1563–5. 10.1007/s00701-012-1349-622527581
  2. Compagnone C, Murray GD, Teasdale GM, Maas AIR, Esposito D, Princi P, et al.; European Brain Injury Consortium. The management of patients with intradural post-traumatic mass lesions: a multicenter survey of current approaches to surgical management in 729 patients coordinated by the European Brain Injury Consortium. Neurosurgery 2005;57:1183–92; discussion 1183.16331166
  3. Li LM, Kolias AG, Guilfoyle MR, Timofeev I, Corteen EA, Pickard JD, et al. Outcome following evacuation of acute subdural haematomas: a comparison of craniotomy with decompressive craniectomy. Acta Neurochir 2012;154:1555–61. 10.1007/s00701-012-1428-822752713
  4. Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, Gordon D, Hartl R, Newell DW, et al.; Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Author Group. Surgical management of acute subdural hematomas. Neurosurgery 2006;58:S16–24; discussion Si–iv.16710968
  5. Kolias AG, Scotton WJ, Belli A, King AT, Brennan PM, Bulters DO, et al.; UK Neurosurgical Research Network. Surgical management of acute subdural haematomas: current practice patterns in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Br J Neurosurg 2013;27:330–3. 10.3109/02688697.2013.77936523530712
  6. Hutchinson PJ, Adams H, Mohan M, Devi BI, Uff C, Hasan S, et al. Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma. New Engl J Med 2023;388:2219–29. 10.1056/nejmoa221417237092792
  7. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 2011;20:1727–36. 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x21479777
  8. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary. RESCUE-ASDH Trial Site. University of Calgary. 2020.
  9. NICE. NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013. 2013. URL: www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/chapter/introduction (accessed 8 September 2024).
  10. Curtis LA, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health & Social Care 2020. PSSRU; 2020. 10.22024/unikent/01.02.84818
  11. Ramsey SD, Willke RJ, Glick H, Reed SD, Augustovski F, Jonsson B, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II: an ISPOR good research practices task force report. Value Health 2015;18:161–72. 10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.00125773551
  12. Scotland PH. Theatre – Direct Cost Per Hour by Speciality. 2019. URL: www.isdscotland.org/health-topics/finance/costs/Detailed-Tables/Theatres.asp (accessed 21 May 2025).
  13. Fountain DM, Henry J, Honeyman S, O’Connor P, Sekhon P, Piper RJ, et al. First report of a multicenter prospective registry of cranioplasty in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Neurosurgery 2021;89:518–26. 10.1093/neuros/nyab22034192745
  14. Turner-Stokes L, Williams H, Bill A, Bassett P, Sephton K. Cost-efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for working-aged adults with complex neurological disabilities: a multicentre cohort analysis of a national clinical data set. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010238. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010238
  15. Health, Centre SCI. NHS Schedule of Reference Costs 2017/18. 2018. URL: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20200501111106/https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/reference-costs/ (accessed 21 May 2025).
  16. Health, Centre SCI. NHS Schedule of Reference Costs 2018/19. URL: www.england.nhs.uk/publication/2018-19-national-cost-collection-data-publication/ (accessed 21 May 2025).
  17. Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2015. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent. URL: www.pssru.ac.uk/project-pages/unit-costs/unit-costs-2015/ (accessed 21 May 2025).
  18. NICE. NICE Health Technology Evaluations: The Manual (PMG 36). 2022. URL: www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg36/chapter/introduction-to-health-technology-evaluation (accessed 21 May 2025).
  19. Pyne S, Barton G, Turner D, Mee H, Gregson BA, Kolias AG, et al. RESCUE-ASDH Trial Collaborators. Cost-effectiveness of craniotomy versus decompressive craniectomy for UK patients with traumatic acute subdural haematoma. BMJ Open 2024;14:e085084. 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085084
  20. NICE. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013. PharmacoEconomics 2013;26:1–93. 10.2165/00019053-200826090-00002
  21. NICE. Position Statement on Use of the EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England (Updated October 2019). 2019. URL: www.nice.org.uk/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/nice-guidance/technology-appraisal-guidance/eq-5d-5l (accessed 21 May 2025).
  22. Hout BV, Janssen MF, Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Busschbach J, Golicki D, et al. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health 2012;15:708–15. 10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.00822867780
  23. Alava MH, Pudney S, Wailoo A. The EQ-5D-5L value set for England: findings of a quality assurance program. Value Health 2020;23:642–8. 10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.01732389230
  24. Alava MH, Wailoo A, Pudney S. Methods for Mapping between the EQ-5D-5L and the 3L for Technology Appraisal. Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield. 2017. URL: www.sheffield.ac.uk/nice-dsu/methods-development/mapping-eq-5d-5l-3l (accessed 21 May 2025).
  25. Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ 2005;14:487–96. 10.1002/hec.94415497198
  26. Teasdale GM, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 1974;304:81–4. 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0
  27. Teasdale GM, Pettigrew LEL, Wilson JTL, Murray G, Jennett B. Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma 1998;15:587–97. 10.1089/neu.1998.15.5879726258
  28. Wilson JTL, Slieker FJA, Legrand V, Murray G, Stocchetti N, Maas AIR. Observer variation in the assessment of outcome in traumatic brain injury: experience from a multicenter, international randomized clinical trial. Neurosurgery 2007;61:123–8; discussion 128. 10.1227/01.neu.0000279732.21145.9e
  29. Wilson JTL, Pettigrew LEL, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 1998;15:573–85. 10.1089/neu.1998.15.5739726257
  30. Faria R, Gomes M, Epstein D, White IR. A guide to handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analysis conducted within randomised controlled trials. PharmacoEconomics 2014;32:1157–70. 10.1007/s40273-014-0193-325069632
  31. Little R, Rubin D. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 2nd edn. London: Wiley; 2002.
  32. Willan AR, Briggs AH, Hoch JS. Regression methods for covariate adjustment and subgroup analysis for non-censored cost-effectiveness data. Health Econ 2004;13:461–75. 10.1002/hec.84315127426
  33. Phan K, Moore JM, Griessenauer C, Dmytriw AA, Scherman DB, Sheik-Ali S, et al. Craniotomy versus decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2017;101:677–85.e2. 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.02428315797
  34. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, OBrien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
  35. Ruggeri AG, Cappelletti M, Tempestilli M, Fazzolari B, Delfini R. Surgical management of acute subdural hematoma: a comparison between decompressive craniectomy and craniotomy on patients treated from 2010 to the present in a single center. J Neurosurg Sci 2018;66:22–7.30259718
  36. Shibahashi K, Sugiyama K, Tomio J, Hoda H, Morita A. In-hospital mortality and length of hospital stay with craniotomy versus craniectomy for acute subdural hemorrhage: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis. J Neurosurg 2019;133:504–13. 10.3171/2019.4.jns18266031226690
  37. Claxton K. The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J Health Econ 1999;18:341–64. 10.1016/s0167-6296(98)00039-310537899
  38. Briggs A, Sculpher M, Claxton K. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Int J Epidemiol 2006;36:476–7. 10.1093/ije/dym062
  39. Peek G, Elbourne D, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, et al. Randomised controlled trial and parallel economic evaluation of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR). Health Technol Asses 2010;14:1–282. 10.3310/hta14350
  40. Behranwala R, Aojula N, Hagana A, Houbby N, Preux DL de. An economic evaluation for the use of decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of refractory traumatic intracranial hypertension. Brain Inj 2021;35:444–52. 10.1080/02699052.2021.187855633529095
  41. Gray AM, Clarke PM, Wolstenholme JL, Wordsworth S. Applied Methods of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Healthcare. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
  42. Wong TH, Nadkarni NV, Nguyen HV, Lim GH, Matchar DB, Seow DCC, et al. One-year and three-year mortality prediction in adult major blunt trauma survivors: a National Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2018;26:28. 10.1186/s13049-018-0497-y29669572
  43. Buxton J. Mortality Rates (qx), Principal Projection, England and Wales. 2022. URL: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectancies/datasets/mortalityratesqxprincipalprojectionenglandandwales (accessed 21 May 2025).
  44. Phan K, Moore JM, Griessenauer C, Dmytriw AA, Scherman DB, Sheik-Ali S, et al. Craniotomy versus decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2017;101:677–85.e2.28315797
  45. Rush B, Rousseau J, Sekhon MS, Griesdale DE. Craniotomy versus craniectomy for acute traumatic subdural hematoma in the United States: a national retrospective cohort analysis. World Neurosurg 2016;88:25–31. 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.03426748175
  46. Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, Arabi YM, Davies AR, D’Urso P, et al. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. New Engl J Med 2011;364:1493–502. 10.1056/nejmoa110207721434843
  47. Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, Corteen EA, Czosnyka M, Timothy J, et al. Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. New Engl J Med 2016;375:1119–30. 10.1056/nejmoa160521527602507
  48. Kolias AG, Adams H, Timofeev IS, Corteen EA, Hossain I, Czosnyka M, et al.; RESCUEicp Trial Collaborators. Evaluation of Outcomes Among Patients With Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension Treated With Decompressive Craniectomy vs Standard Medical Care at 24 Months: A Secondary Analysis of the RESCUEicp Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol 2022;79:664–71. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.107035666526
  49. Bell RS, Mossop CM, Dirks MS, Stephens FL, Mulligan L, Ecker R, et al. Early decompressive craniectomy for severe penetrating and closed head injury during wartime. Neurosurg Focus 2010;28:E1. 10.3171/2010.2.focus1022
  50. Charry J, Rubiano A, Nikas C, Ortíz JC, Puyana JC, Carney N, et al. Results of early cranial decompression as an initial approach for damage control therapy in severe traumatic brain injury in a hospital with limited resources. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2016;7:7–12. 10.4103/0976-3147.17215126933337
← ConclusionsAdditional information →

Attribution. Peter Hutchinson; Harry Mee; Hadie Adams; Midhun Mohan; Bhagavatula I Devi; Christopher Uff et al. (2026). Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for patients undergoing surgical evacuation of an acute subdural hematoma: RESCUE-ASDH RCT and cost effectiveness. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2026 Hutchinson et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK624437. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • References

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support