EvidenceLib · Open textbook · CC BY 4.0

Evaluation of venous thromboembolism risk assessment models for hospital inpatients: the VTEAM evidence synthesis

Daniel Edward Horner, Sarah Davis, Abdullah Pandor, Helen Shulver, Steve Goodacre, Daniel Hind, Saleema Rex, Michael Gillett, Matthew Bursnall, Xavier Griffin, Mark Holland, Beverley Jane Hunt, Kerstin de Wit, Shan Bennett, Robin Pierce-Williams · 12 sections in 12 chapters. Each section is its own page.

Introduction

• Introduction

Rationale and objectives

• Rationale and objectives

Workstream 1 – systematic review

• Workstream 1 – systematic review

Workstream 1 – economic evaluation

• Workstream 1 – economic evaluation

Workstream 2 – assessing the feasibility of efficient data methods for use in future implementation research

• Workstream 2 – assessing the feasibility of efficient data methods for use in future implementation research

Workstream 2 – estimating key parameters for future implementation research

• Workstream 2 – estimating key parameters for future implementation research

Workstream 2 – national survey of VTE leads regarding current practice and willingness to participate in future implementation research

• Workstream 2 – national survey of VTE leads regarding current practice and willingness to participate in future implementation research

Discussion

• Discussion

Conclusions

• Conclusions

References

• References

Acknowledgements

• Acknowledgements

List of supplementary material

• List of supplementary material

Attribution. Daniel Edward Horner; Sarah Davis; Abdullah Pandor; Helen Shulver; Steve Goodacre; Daniel Hind et al. (2024). Evaluation of venous thromboembolism risk assessment models for hospital inpatients: the VTEAM evidence synthesis. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2024 Horner et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK602843. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.