- Topic guides for qualitative interviews
- Full Clinical Practice Research Datalink code lists
- Statistical model specification
- Objective 2: extra models investigating the impact of additional risk factors on physical and mental health outcomes
- Objective 3: adjusted impact of type 2 diabetes on physical and mental health outcomes for people with severe mental illness (core models)
- Objective 3: adjusted impact of type 2 diabetes on physical health checks for people with severe mental illness (core models)
- Objective 3: adjusted impact of type 2 diabetes on physical and mental health outcomes for people with severe mental illness (extended models)
- Objective 3: adjusted impact of type 2 diabetes on physical health checks for people with severe mental illness (extended models)
- Objective 4: adjusted impact of severe mental illness on physical and mental health outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes (core models)
- Objective 4: adjusted impact of severe mental illness on physical health checks for people with type 2 diabetes (core models)
- Objective 4: adjusted impact of severe mental illness on physical and mental health outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes (extended models)
- Objective 4: adjusted impact of severe mental illness on physical health checks for people with type 2 diabetes (extended models)
- Objective 6: overview of measures of unitisation and unit costs
- Objective 6: types of staff role and consultation
- Objective 6: types, Healthcare Resource Group codes and unit costs of diagnostic tests
- The two personas used in co-design workshop 1 to generate discussion
- An example of the empathy map used in co-design workshop 1
- Example of the board representing care professionals used as a discussion point in co-design workshop 2
Supplementary material can be found on the NIHR Journals Library report page (https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr09100).
Supplementary material has been provided by the authors to support the report and any files provided at submission will have been seen by peer reviewers, but not extensively reviewed. Any supplementary material provided at a later stage in the process may not have been peer reviewed.