Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Medical management and intervention (using neurosurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery) versus medical management alone for symptomatic brain cavernoma: the CARE pilot RCT›Impact and learning

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Medical management and intervention (using neurosurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery) versus medical management alone for symptomatic brain cavernoma: the CARE pilot RCT · Impact and learning

Impact and learning

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 1 min read

The CARE pilot trial has already had an impact on patients and professionals in the clinical neuroscience community, by showing that a wide-ranging collaboration can be formed across the UK and potentially Ireland, also including patient advocacy organisations and qualitative researchers. We obtained engagement from a large number and proportion of the neurosurgical sites in the UK, which engaged with the QRI, which was itself embedded in clinical consultations, where interventions about barriers and facilitators could be implemented.

In the longer term, the result of the CARE pilot RCT seems likely to reinforce reasons for uncertainty about symptomatic brain cavernoma management with intervention. In time, the RCT will be incorporated into updated clinical guidelines.14–16 The pilot RCT justifies the conduct of a definitive RCT, informs its feasibility and provides suggestions for how multidisciplinary decision-making, conventions of usual care, willingness to offer intervention and the design of participant materials may increase the recruitment rate. The financial and logistical feasibility of a definitive RCT will be determined by clinical communities’ reactions to the result, equipoise, willingness of sites to engage with a definitive RCT across the world, willingness of clinical researchers to apply for funding to support the RCT in their own country and funding agencies’ decisions.

← Equality, diversity and inclusionImplication for decision-makers →

Attribution. Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Neil Kitchen; Laura Forsyth; Vijeya Ganesan; Peter S Hall; Kirsty Harkness et al. (2025). Medical management and intervention (using neurosurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery) versus medical management alone for symptomatic brain cavernoma: the CARE pilot RCT. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2025 Al-Shahi Salman et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK617151. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Impact and learning

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support