Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team›Limitations

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team · Limitations

Limitations

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 1 min read

This overarching study is based on our analysis of the BRACE portfolio of studies; thus it is based on the 10 evaluations that have been published by the NIHR Journals Library and is not meant to be exhaustive. The work has been supplemented by research activities with a limited scope, including a rapid but replicable review of the literature related to remote monitoring technology for people living with multiple long-term conditions and a set of interviews with national and regional stakeholders based on a convenience sample. Given the pragmatic approach, detailed demographic data on stakeholder participants were not collected, nor are we able to synthesise participant information across the 10 evaluations to understand possible areas of under-representation in this overarching study.

← Implications for researchConclusion →

Attribution. Jon Sussex; Judith Smith; Frances M Wu (2024). Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2024 Sussex et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK604637. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Limitations

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support