Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team›Conclusion

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team · Conclusion

Conclusion

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 1 min read

In this synopsis report, we have explored the 10 studies undertaken by the BRACE over the period 2018–23, focusing on the ways in which these evaluations of service innovations took account of and impacted on people living with multiple long-term conditions. Through a thematic analysis of the portfolio of evaluations, we have deduced a set of suggested implications for policy, research and practice in respect of attending to the needs of people with multiple long-term conditions when designing and undertaking evaluations of service innovations, and for health and care policy and research more generally. What is clear is that while multimorbidity is a common occurrence, and usually the norm for people over the age of 50 using health and care services, it is not yet at the heart of health service provision, nor of research and evaluation activity. We hope that this overarching study offers useful pointers to how progress might be made in paying greater attention to the health and care needs and priorities of people living with multiple long-term conditions.

← LimitationsParticipant representation →

Attribution. Jon Sussex; Judith Smith; Frances M Wu (2024). Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2024 Sussex et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK604637. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Conclusion

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support