Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›Open textbooks›Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team›Participant representation

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team · Participant representation

Participant representation

CC BY 4.0 · National Institute for Health and Care Research · approximately 1 min read

The study reported here draws mainly on the BRACE portfolio of evaluations, supplemented by a focused review of literature and interviews with NHS policy- and decision-makers at national and sub-national levels in England.

The ways in which BRACE researchers sought to ensure appropriate representation and reflection of diverse population groups in individual evaluations is described in the corresponding report of each of the individual evaluations, and they are published in the NIHR Journals Library. Overall, BRACE researchers in each evaluation have used a range of strategies to promote inclusivity. For example, the team offered interviewees different modes of interview [in person, telephone or online via Microsoft Teams or Zoom (Zoom Video Communications, San Jose, CA, USA)] and different times depending on participants’ preferences to ensure accessibility for as many people as possible given workforce and work-life balance constraints.

← ConclusionParticipant characteristics →

Attribution. Jon Sussex; Judith Smith; Frances M Wu (2024). Service innovations for people with multiple long-term conditions: reflections of a rapid evaluation team. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Copyright © 2024 Sussex et al. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. NCBI Bookshelf NBK604637. CC BY 4.0. Original source ↗. Text reproduced from the Bookshelf XML without changing wording; figures, images and supplements are not reproduced.

In this chapter Contents

  • Participant representation

Source

OpenStax source file ↗

Source record ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support